FULLTEXT DEL 2 AV 5
10-K – 2026-02-13 – reg-20251231.htm
with respect to climate change may be enacted or brought in the future, and the extent and scope of their requirements and impact on companies like Regency are unknown. While many of our investments relating to GHG emission reduction, energy efficient lighting, building systems upgrades, clean energy installations, water usage reduction and other similar initiatives provide favorable returns and contribute to the resilience of our assets and sustainability of our business, compliance with numerous, potentially fragmented current and future laws and regulations related to perceived risks of climate change has required us to make additional investments and incur additional costs, as well as to implement new or additional processes and controls to facilitate better disclosure and meet compliance and disclosure obligations, and we expect this to continue into the future.
In sum, taking these risks and potential impacts together, climate change may materially and adversely impact our business by increasing the cost to operate our properties, for example, with respect to infrastructure and facilities construction and maintenance, energy, insurance (and, potentially, the incurrence of uninsured losses), taxes, consultants and advisors, and other unforeseen fees, costs and expenses. We may also face disruptions to our business and the businesses of our tenants, which may result in higher costs or even some tenants being unable to conduct business in certain locations. In addition, we face the risk of the impacts of current, proposed and future legislative, regulatory and other governmental policy-related requirements in response to the perceived risks of climate change, as well as the expectations of investors, lenders and other stakeholders as to disclosures and responses relating to climate-related matters. At this time, there can be no assurance that we can anticipate all potential material impacts of climate change, or that climate change and our responses to it will not have a material and adverse effect on the value of our properties and our operational and financial performance in the future.
Costs of environmental remediation may adversely impact our financial performance and reduce our cash flow.
Under various federal, state, and local laws, an owner or manager of real property may be liable for some or all the costs to assess and remediate the presence of hazardous substances on the property, which in our case most typically arise from current or former dry cleaners, gas stations, automotive repair shops, asbestos usage, and historic land use practices. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of hazardous substances, which may adversely impact our financial performance and reduce our cash flow. The presence of, or the failure to properly address the presence of, hazardous substances may adversely affect our ability to sell or lease the property, or borrow using the property as collateral. We can provide no assurance that we are aware of all potential environmental liabilities or their ultimate cost to address; that our properties will not be affected by tenants or nearby properties or other unrelated third parties; and that future uses or conditions, or changes in environmental laws and regulations, or their interpretation, will not result in additional material environmental liabilities to us.
Risk Factors Related to Corporate Matters
An increased and differing focus on metrics and reporting related to environmental, social and governance ("ESG") factors by investors, lenders and other stakeholders may impose additional costs and expose us to new risks.
Many investors, lenders and other stakeholders are focused on understanding how companies report on and address a variety of ESG factors, including institutional investors who hold a significant amount of the equity and debt of the Company. As they evaluate investment decisions, many investors look not only at company disclosures but also to ESG rating systems and frameworks that have been developed by third parties (such as TCFD and GRESB) to allow ESG comparisons between companies. Although we participate in some of these ratings systems, we do not participate in all such systems, and may not score as well in all of the available ratings systems as other REITs and real estate operators. Further, the criteria used in these ratings systems may conflict with each other and change frequently, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to score well in the future. We supplement our participation in ratings systems by disclosing on our website information about our initiatives and activities, but some investors may desire additional disclosures that we do not provide. Failure to participate in certain of the third-party ratings systems, failure to score well in those ratings systems or failure to provide certain ESG disclosures or engage in certain ESG-related initiatives and actions could adversely impact us when investors compare us against similar companies in our industry, and could cause certain investors to be unwilling to invest in our stock, which could adversely impact our stock price and our ability to raise capital.
ESG disclosures may reflect aspirational goals, targets, and other expectations and assumptions, which are necessarily uncertain and may not be realized. Failure to realize (or timely achieve progress on) aspirational goals and targets could adversely affect the views of our investors, third-party ESG ratings organizations and other stakeholders, thereby potentially adversely impacting our reputation, our business and stock price (to the extent that demand for our stock declines). We may also face scrutiny by anti-ESG stakeholders for having such goals or targets, or for our participation in ESG rating or other systems. Moreover, we expect investor, lender and other stakeholder pressure to comply with these voluntary disclosure frameworks to continue, irrespective of climate-related policy decisions by the federal government. Failure to comply with government climate and other ESG-related regulations could also subject us to significant fines and penalties, including risk of litigation, as well as negative perception by stakeholders. In addition, both advocates and opponents of certain ESG matters may resort to a range of activism forms, including media campaigns, shareholder proposals, and litigation, to advance their objectives. To the extent we are subject to such activism, it may adversely impact our business.
15
An uninsured loss or a loss that exceeds the insurance coverage on our properties may subject us to loss of capital and revenue on those properties.
We carry liability, fire, flood, terrorism, business interruption, and environmental insurance for our properties. Some types of losses, such as losses from named windstorms, hurricanes, earthquakes, flooding, terrorism, or wars may have more limited coverage, or in some cases, can be excluded from insurance coverage. In addition, it is possible that the availability of insurance coverage in certain geographic areas may decrease in the future or become unavailable to us, and the cost to procure such insurance may increase due to lack of market availability or other factors beyond our control. As a result, we may reduce the insurance we procure or we may elect or be compelled to self-insure or otherwise assume some or all of this risk through deductibles, retentions and other risk-sharing structures. Should a loss occur at any of our properties that is in excess of the insurance limits of our policies, we may lose part or all of our invested capital and revenues from the impacted property or properties, which may have a material adverse impact on our operating results, financial condition, and our ability to make distributions to stock and unit holders.
Terrorist activities or violence occurring at our properties also may directly affect the value of our properties through damage, destruction or loss. Insurance for such acts may be unavailable or cost more resulting in an increase to our operating expenses and adversely affect our results of operations. To the extent that our tenants are affected by such attacks and threats of violence, their businesses may be adversely affected, including their ability to continue to meet obligations under their existing leases.
Failure to attract and retain key personnel may adversely affect our business and operations.
The success of our business depends, in significant part, on the leadership and performance of our executive management team and other key personnel, and our ability to attract, retain and motivate talented employees may significantly impact our future performance. Competition for these individuals is intense, and we cannot be assured that we will retain all of our executive management team and other key personnel or that we will be able to attract and retain other highly qualified individuals for these positions in the future. Losing any key personnel may have an adverse effect on us.
Risk Factors Related to Our Partnerships and Joint Ventures
We do not have voting control over all of the properties owned in our real estate partnerships and joint ventures, so we are unable to ensure that our objectives will be pursued.
We have invested substantial capital as a partner in a number of partnerships and joint ventures to acquire, own, lease, develop or redevelop properties. These activities are subject to the same risks as our investments in our wholly-owned properties. However, these investments, and other future similar investments may involve risks that would not be present were a third party not involved, including the possibility that partners or other owners might become bankrupt, suffer a deterioration in their creditworthiness, or fail to fund their share of required capital contributions. Partners or other owners may have economic or other business interests or goals that are inconsistent with our own business interests or goals, and may be in a position to take actions contrary to our policies or objectives.
These investments, and other future similar investments, also have the potential risk of creating impasses on decisions, such as a sale or financing, because neither we nor our partner or other owner has full control over the partnership or joint venture. Disputes between us and partners or other owners might result in a premature termination of the applicable partnership or joint venture, or potentially litigation or arbitration, that may increase our investment and related risk as well as our costs and expenses associated with the investment, and distract management from sufficiently focusing their time and efforts on others areas of our business. In addition, we risk the possibility of being held liable for the actions of our partners or other owners. These factors may limit the return that we receive from such investments or cause our cash flows to be lower than our estimates.
The termination of our partnerships may adversely affect our cash flow, operating results, and our ability to make distributions to stock and unit holders.
If partnerships owning a significant number of properties were dissolved for any reason, we could lose the asset, property management, leasing and construction management fees from these partnerships as well as the operating income of the properties, which may adversely affect our operating results and our cash available for distribution to stock and unit holders. Certain of our partnership operating agreements provide either member the ability to elect buy/sell clauses. The election of these provisions could require us to invest additional capital to acquire the partners’ interest or to sell our share of the property thereby losing the operating income and cash flow.
16
Risk Factors Related to Funding Strategies and Capital Structure
Our ability to sell properties and fund acquisitions and developments may be adversely impacted by higher market capitalization rates and lower NOI at our properties, which may adversely affect results of operations and financial condition.
As part of our funding strategy, we sell properties that no longer meet our strategic objectives or investment standards and/or those with a limited future growth profile. These sales proceeds are used to fund debt repayment, acquisition of other properties, and new developments and redevelopments. An increase in market capitalization rates (which may or may not be driven by an increase in interest rates) or a decline in NOI may cause a reduction in the value of centers identified for sale, which would have an adverse impact on the amount of cash generated. Additionally, the sale of properties resulting in significant tax gains may require higher distributions to our stockholders or payment of additional income taxes in order to maintain our REIT status.
We depend on external sources of capital, which may not be available in the future on favorable terms or at all.
To qualify as a REIT, the Parent Company must, among other things, distribute to its stockholders each year at least 90% of its REIT taxable income (excluding any net capital gains). Because of these distribution requirements, we may not be able to fund all future capital needs with income from operations. In such instances, we would rely on third-party sources of capital, which may or may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our access to third-party sources of equity capital depends on a number of things, including the market's perception of our growth potential and our current and potential future earnings. Our access to debt depends on our credit rating, the willingness of creditors to lend to us and conditions in the capital markets. In addition to finding lenders willing to lend to us, we are dependent upon our joint venture partners to contribute their pro rata share of any amount needed to repay or refinance existing debt when lenders reduce the amount of debt our partnerships and joint ventures are eligible to refinance.
In addition, our existing debt arrangements also impose covenants that limit our flexibility in obtaining other financing. Additional equity offerings may result in substantial dilution of stockholders' interests and additional debt financing may substantially increase our degree of leverage.
Without access to external sources of capital, we would be required to pay outstanding debt with our operating cash flows and proceeds from property sales. Our operating cash flows may not be sufficient to pay our outstanding debt as it comes due and real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly at a return we believe is appropriate. If we are required to deleverage our business with operating cash flows and proceeds from property sales, we may be forced to reduce the amount of, or eliminate altogether, our distributions to stock and unit holders or refrain from making investments in our business.
Our debt financing may adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Our ability to make scheduled payments or to refinance our indebtedness will depend primarily on our future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. In addition, we do not expect to generate sufficient operating cash flow to make balloon principal payments on our debt when due. If we are unable to refinance our debt on acceptable terms, we may be forced (i) to dispose of properties, which might result in losses, or (ii) to obtain financing at unfavorable terms, either of which may reduce the cash flow available for distributions to stock and unit holders. If we cannot make required mortgage loan payments, the mortgagee may foreclose on the property securing the mortgage.
Covenants in our debt agreements may restrict our operating activities and adversely affect our financial condition.
Our unsecured notes and unsecured line of credit (the "Line") contain customary covenants, including compliance with financial ratios, such as ratio of indebtedness to total asset value and fixed charge coverage ratio. These covenants may limit our operational flexibility and our investment activities. Moreover, if we breach any of the covenants in our debt agreements, and do not cure the breach within the applicable cure period, our lenders may require us to repay the debt immediately, even in the absence of a payment default. Many of our debt arrangements, including our unsecured notes and the Line, are cross-defaulted, which means that the lenders under those debt arrangements can require immediate repayment of their debt if we breach and fail to cure a default under certain of our other material debt obligations. As a result, any default under our debt covenants may have an adverse effect on our financial condition, our results of operations, our ability to meet our obligations, and the market value of our stock.
17
Hedging activity may expose us to risks, including the risks that a counterparty will not perform and that the hedge will not yield the economic benefits we anticipate, which may adversely affect us.
We manage our exposure to interest rate volatility by using interest rate hedging arrangements. These arrangements involve risk, such as the risk that counterparties may fail to honor their obligations under these arrangements, and that these arrangements may not be effective in reducing our exposure to interest rate changes. There can be no assurance that our hedging arrangements will qualify for hedge accounting or that our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results of operations. Should we desire to terminate a hedging arrangement, there may be significant costs and cash requirements involved to fulfill our obligations under the hedging arrangement. In addition, failure to effectively hedge against interest rate changes may adversely affect our results of operations.
Risk Factors Related to Information Management and Technology
The unauthorized access, use, theft or destruction of tenant or employee personal, financial or other data, or of Regency's proprietary or confidential information stored in our information systems or by third parties on our behalf, could impact operations, and expose us to potential liabilities and material adverse financial impact.
Many of our information technology systems (including the systems of our real estate partners and other third-party business partners and service providers) contain personal, financial or other information that is entrusted to us by our tenants, employees and business partners. Many of our information technology systems contain our proprietary information and other confidential information related to our business.
Like all companies, we face numerous and evolving cybersecurity risks that threaten the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our information technology systems and confidential information, including from diverse threat actors, such as state-sponsored organizations, opportunistic hackers and hacktivists, and through diverse attack vectors, such as social engineering/phishing, malware (including ransomware), "deep fakes" generated through the use of Artificial Intelligence ("AI") tools, malfeasance by insiders, human or technological error, and as a result of malicious code embedded in open-source software, or misconfigurations, bugs or other vulnerabilities in commercial software that is integrated into our (or our suppliers’ or service providers’) information technology systems, products or services. We have experienced cyberattacks and cybersecurity incidents in the past (although none had material adverse impacts on our business or results of operations) and expect to face similar ongoing threats in the future. To the extent we or a third party were to experience a material breach of our information technology systems that results in the unauthorized access, theft, use, manipulation, destruction or other compromises of our confidential information stored in such systems, including through cyber-attacks such as ransomware, denial of service or other methods, such a breach may cause us to lose tenants and employees, result in adverse financial impact, incur third party claims and cause disruption to our business and plans. Despite planning, preparation, and preventative and risk-management measures, our business may be significantly disrupted if unable to quickly recover. Remote and hybrid working arrangements at our company (and at many third-party providers) may also increase cybersecurity risks due to the challenges associated with managing remote computing assets and security vulnerabilities that are present in many non-corporate and home networks. Additionally, any integration of AI in our or any service providers’ operations, products or services may pose new or unknown cybersecurity risks and challenges. There can be no assurance that our cybersecurity risk management program and processes, including our policies, controls and procedures, will be fully implemented, complied with or effective in protecting our systems and information. Such security breaches also could subject us to litigation and governmental investigations and proceedings into potential violations of applicable privacy or other laws. Any of these events could result in our exposure to material civil or criminal liability, and we may not be able to fully recover these expenses from our service providers, responsible parties, or insurance carriers, or that applicable insurance will be available to us in the future on economically reasonable terms or at all. We can provide no assurance that the ongoing significant investments in technology and training we make relating to cybersecurity will avoid or prevent such breaches or attacks.
Cyberattacks are expected to increase on a global basis in frequency and magnitude as threat actors are becoming increasingly sophisticated in using techniques and tools—including AI—that trick humans into taking unwarranted actions, circumvent security controls, evade detection and remove forensic evidence. Despite the implementation of training of our employees and security measures for our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, our information systems may be vulnerable to damage or other adverse impact from multiple sources other than cybersecurity risks, including computer viruses, energy blackouts, natural disasters, terrorism, war, and telecommunication failure. Any system failure or accident that causes disruption or interruptions to our information systems could result in a material disruption to our operations and business, and cause us to incur material costs to remedy such damages or adverse impacts.
18
Any actual or perceived failure to comply with new or existing laws, regulations and other requirements relating to the privacy, security and processing of personal information could adversely affect our business, results of operations, or financial condition.
In connection with running our business, we receive, store, use and otherwise process information that relates to individuals, including from and about our tenants, employees and business partners. We are therefore subject to laws, regulations and other requirements relating to the privacy, security and handling of personal information. These laws require us to adhere to certain disclosure restrictions and deletion obligations with respect to the personal information, and allow for penalties for violations and, in some cases, a private right of action. These laws also impose transparency and other obligations with respect to personal information of and provide rights with respect to personal information. The application and interpretation of such requirements are evolving and are subject to change, creating a complex compliance environment. There has been a substantial increase in legislative activity and regulatory focus on data privacy and security, including in relation to cybersecurity incidents.
It is possible that new laws, regulations and other requirements, or amendments to or changes in interpretations of existing laws, regulations and other requirements, may require us to incur significant costs, implement new processes, or change our handling of information and business operations. In addition, any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with laws, regulations and other requirements relating to the privacy, security and handling of information could result in legal claims or proceedings (including class actions), regulatory investigations or enforcement actions. We could incur costs in investigating and defending such claims and, if found liable, pay damages or fines or be required to make changes to our business. These proceedings and any subsequent adverse outcomes may subject us to significant negative publicity and an erosion of trust. If any of these events were to occur, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The use of technology based on AI presents risks relating to confidentiality, creation of inaccurate and flawed outputs and emerging regulatory risk, any or all of which may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
As with many technological innovations, AI presents great promise but also risks and challenges that could adversely affect our business. Sensitive, proprietary, or confidential information of the Company, our tenants, employees and business partners could be leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in connection with the use of AI technologies by our employees, tenants or vendors. For example, any such information input into a third-party AI or machine learning platform could be revealed to others, including if information is used to train the third party's AI or machine learning models. Additionally, where an AI or machine learning model ingests personal information and makes connections using such data, those technologies may reveal other sensitive, proprietary, or confidential information generated by the model. Moreover, AI or machine learning models may create incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise flawed outputs, which may nonetheless appear correct. Based on these and other factors, these models could lead us to make flawed decisions that could result in adverse consequences to us, including exposure to reputational and competitive harm, customer loss, and legal liability.
Despite the above risks and challenges associated with the use of AI, in the retail industry AI is increasingly being adopted for personalized marketing, inventory management, customer service, pricing optimization, and supply chain management. The costs of implementing new technologies, including AI-driven property management tools, smart building systems, and data analytics platforms, may be substantial.The effectiveness of these tools are being evaluated in an ongoing mannter.
Advanced analytics and AI may enable retailers to optimize their store footprints, potentially leading to reduced space requirements and location closures. Moreover, generative AI and virtual shopping experiences may further shift consumer behavior away from physical stores. AI-powered tools may enable more efficient e-commerce operations, potentially impacting some of the competitive advantages of physical retail locations. Because the use and regulation of AI technologies continue to evolve, additional risks may emerge over time.
In addition, uncertainty in the legal and regulatory regime relating to AI may require significant resources to modify and maintain business practices to comply with applicable law, the nature of which cannot be determined at this time. Several jurisdictions have already proposed or enacted laws governing AI and may decide to adopt similar or more restrictive legislation that may render the use of such technologies challenging. These obligations may prevent or limit our ability to use AI in our business, lead to regulatory fines or penalties for AI use that does not meet certain standards, and require us to change our business practices. If we cannot use AI, or that use is restricted, our business may be less efficient, or we may be at a competitive disadvantage.
In sum, any of the above risks associated with the use of AI could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
19
Risk Factors Related to Taxes and the Parent Company's Qualification as a REIT
If the Parent Company fails to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, it would be subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates.
We believe that the Parent Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, and we plan to operate so that the Parent Company can continue to meet the requirements for taxation as a REIT. If the Parent Company continues to qualify as a REIT, it generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes to its stockholders. Many REIT requirements, however, are highly technical and complex. The determination that the Parent Company is a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances, some of which may not be totally within our control and some of which involve questions of interpretation. For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come from specific passive sources, like rent, that are itemized in the REIT tax laws. There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") or a court would agree with the positions we have taken in interpreting the REIT requirements. The Parent Company is also required to distribute to the stockholders at least 90% of its REIT taxable income, excluding net capital gains. The Parent Company will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on undistributed taxable income and net capital gains and to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on any amount by which distributions the Parent Company pays with respect to any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years. The fact that we hold many of our assets through real estate partnerships and their subsidiaries further complicates the application of the REIT requirements. Furthermore, Congress and the IRS might make changes to the tax laws and regulations, and the courts might issue new rulings, that make it more difficult for the Parent Company to remain qualified as a REIT.
Also, unless the IRS granted relief under certain statutory provisions, the Parent Company would remain disqualified as a REIT for four years following the year it first failed to qualify. If the Parent Company failed to qualify as a REIT (currently and/or with respect to any tax years for which the statute of limitations has not expired), the Parent Company would have to pay significant income taxes, reducing cash available to pay dividends, which would likely have a significant adverse effect on the value of our securities. In addition, the Parent Company would no longer be required to pay any dividends to stockholders in order to maintain its REIT status, and we could be subject to a federal alternative minimum tax and possibly increased state and local taxes. Although we believe that the Parent Company qualifies as a REIT, we cannot be assured that the Parent Company will continue to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT for tax purposes.
Even if the Parent Company qualifies as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, the Parent Company is required to pay certain federal, state, and local taxes on its income and property. For example, if we have net income from "prohibited transactions," that income will be subject to a 100% tax. In general, prohibited transactions include sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business. The determination as to whether a particular sale is a prohibited transaction depends on the facts and circumstances related to that sale. While we have undertaken a number of asset sales in recent years, we do not believe that those sales should be considered prohibited transactions, but there can be no assurance that the IRS would not contend otherwise.
New legislation, as well as new regulations, administrative interpretations, or court decisions may be introduced, enacted, or promulgated from time to time, that may change the tax laws or interpretations of the tax laws regarding qualification as a REIT, or the federal income tax consequences of that qualification, in a manner that is adverse to our stockholders.
Dividends paid by REITs generally do not qualify for reduced tax rates.
Subject to limited exceptions, dividends paid by REITs (other than distributions designated as capital gain dividends, qualified dividends or returns of capital) are not eligible for reduced rates for qualified dividends paid by "C" corporations and are taxable at ordinary income tax rates. However, domestic shareholders that are individuals, trusts, and estates generally may deduct up to 20% of the ordinary dividends (e.g., dividends not designated as capital gain dividends or qualified dividend income) received from a REIT. Although these rules do not adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends payable by REITs, investors who are individuals, trusts and estates may perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which may adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including the per share trading price of the Parent Company's capital stock.
Legislative or other actions affecting REITs may have a negative effect on us or our investors.
The rules dealing with federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Changes to the tax laws, with or without retroactive application, may adversely affect the Parent Company or our investors. We cannot predict how changes in the tax laws might affect the Parent Company or our investors. New legislation, Treasury Regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions may significantly and negatively affect the Parent Company's ability to qualify as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences of such qualification, or the federal income tax consequences of an investment in us. There is also a risk that REIT status may be adversely impacted by a change in tax or other laws. Also, the law relating to the tax treatment of other entities, or an investment in other entities, may change, making an investment in such other entities more attractive relative to an investment in a REIT.
20
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge effectively and may cause us to incur tax liabilities.
The REIT provisions of the Code limit our ability to enter into hedging transactions. Generally, income from certain hedging transactions, generally including transactions to manage interest rate changes with respect to borrowings to acquire or carry real estate assets, does not constitute "gross income" for purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests, provided that we properly identify the hedging transaction pursuant to the applicable sections of the Code and Treasury Regulations. To the extent that we enter into other types of hedging transactions, or fail to make the proper tax identifications, the income from those transactions is likely to be treated as non-qualifying income for purposes of both gross income tests. As a result of these rules, we may need to limit our use of otherwise advantageous hedging techniques or implement those hedges through a TRS.
Partnership tax audit rules could have a material adverse effect.
Under current federal partnership tax audit rules, subject to certain exceptions, any audit adjustment to items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of a partnership (and a partner’s allocable share thereof) is determined, and taxes, interest, and penalties attributable thereto are assessed and collected, at the partnership level. With respect to any partnership in which we invest, unless such partnership makes an election or takes certain steps to require the partners to pay their tax on their allocable shares of the adjustment, it is possible that such partnership would be required to pay additional taxes, interest, and penalties as a result of an audit adjustment. We could be required to bear the economic burden of those taxes, interest, and penalties even though we may not otherwise have been required to pay additional taxes had we owned the assets of the partnership directly.
Risk Factors Related to the Company's Stock
Restrictions on the ownership of the Parent Company's capital stock to preserve its REIT status may delay or prevent a change in control.
Ownership of more than 7% by value of our outstanding capital stock is prohibited, with certain exceptions, by the Parent Company's articles of incorporation, for the purpose of maintaining its qualification as a REIT. This 7% limitation may discourage a change in control and may also (i) deter tender offers for our capital stock, which offers may be attractive to our stockholders, or (ii) limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their capital stock that might otherwise exist if an investor attempted to assemble a block in excess of 7% of our outstanding capital stock or to affect a change in control.
The issuance of the Parent Company's capital stock may delay or prevent a change in control.
The Parent Company's articles of incorporation authorize our Board of Directors to issue up to 30,000,000 shares of preferred stock (less the shares of preferred stock already issued and outstanding) and 10,000,000 shares of special common stock and to establish the preferences and rights of any shares issued. The issuance of preferred stock or special common stock may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control. The provisions of the Florida Business Corporation Act regarding affiliated transactions may also deter potential acquisitions by preventing the acquiring party from consummating a merger or other extraordinary corporate transaction without the approval of our disinterested stockholders.
Ownership in the Parent Company may be diluted in the future.
In the future, a stockholder's percentage ownership in the Company may be diluted because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or other corporate purposes, including equity awards we will grant to our directors, officers and employees. In the past we have issued equity in the secondary market (including in connection with our At the Market ("ATM") program) and may do so again in the future, depending on the price of our stock and other factors.
In addition, our restated articles of incorporation, as amended, authorizes our Board of Directors to issue, without the approval of our stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such preferences, limitations, and relative rights, including preferences over our common stock respecting dividends and distributions, as our Board of Directors generally may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of our common stock. For example, we could grant the holders of preferred stock the right to elect some number of our directors in all events or on the happening of specified events or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences we could assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common stock.
The Parent Company’s amended and restated bylaws provides that the courts located in the State of Florida will be the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.
The Parent Company’s amended and restated bylaws provide that, unless the Parent Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Parent Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim for breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director or officer or other employee of the Parent Company to the Parent Company or its shareholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against the Parent Company or any director or officer or other employee of the Parent Company arising pursuant to any provision of the Florida Business Corporation Act or the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the Parent Company, or (iv) any action asserting a claim against the corporation or any director or officer or other employee of the corporation governed by the internal affairs doctrine shall be the Federal District Court for
21
the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division (or, if such court does not have jurisdiction, a state court located within the State of Florida, County of Duval).
By becoming a shareholder in our Parent Company, you will be deemed to have notice of and have consented to the provisions of the amended and restated bylaws of our Parent Company related to choice of forum. The choice of forum provisions in the amended and restated bylaws may limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us. Additionally, the enforceability of choice of forum provisions in other companies’ governing documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that, in connection with any applicable action brought against us, a court could find the choice of forum provisions contained in the amended and restated bylaws of the Parent Company to be inapplicable or unenforceable in such action. If so, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
There is no assurance that we will continue to pay dividends at current or historical rates.
Our ability to continue to pay dividends at current or historical rates or to increase our dividend rate will depend on a number of factors, including, among others, the following:
• our financial condition and results of future operations;
• the terms of our loan covenants; and
• our ability to acquire, finance, develop or redevelop and lease additional properties at attractive rates.
If we do not maintain or periodically increase the dividend on our common stock, or if we do not pay dividends on our preferred stock, it may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and other securities.
Item 1B. Unresolve d Staff Comments
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity Risk Management and Strategy
We have developed and implemented a cybersecurity risk management program intended to protect the confidentiality, security, and availability of our critical systems and information.
We employ a tiered structure of management and oversight for cybersecurity, characterized by distinct layers of responsibility and decision making, which includes operational staff, management, and senior management and board-level governance. As discussed in more detail below under "Cybersecurity Governance," this involves management responsibility through a specialized Cyber Risk Committee (the "CRC") and oversight of that committee by a group of the most senior leaders of the Company, which comprise the Company’s Executive Committee. At the Company’s Board of Directors (the "Board") level, the Audit Committee oversees our cybersecurity risk management program.
Our strategy for managing cybersecurity risk is integrated into the Company’s overall risk management program and structure, as depicted in the Corporate Governance section of our Proxy under "Risk Oversight."
The Company, through its Chief Information Security Officer ("CISO"), other Company employees experienced in information network security, and the use of third-party expertise references recognized cybersecurity frameworks, such as the National Institute of Standards and Technology ("NIST") Cybersecurity Framework. While our objective is to generally align our cybersecurity program with NIST standards, this does not imply that we meet NIST or any other particular technical standard, specifications, or requirements; rather, these frameworks are used to benchmark and help tailor the Company’s cybersecurity strategies and program to our risk mitigation and operational needs and goals.
Our core cybersecurity strategy focuses on five key pillars: identification, protection, detection, response, and recovery, each tailored to meet the challenges and needs of our business. The primary goal of this strategy is to proactively safeguard the confidentiality, security, and availability of our critical systems and information. This proactive approach includes measures designed to identify, prevent, and mitigate cybersecurity threats and to enable a timely response to cybersecurity incidents to minimize their impact. Under the leadership of our CISO and CRC, we regularly evaluate and enhance our cybersecurity practices to facilitate adaptation to the constantly evolving landscape of cybersecurity threats.
Key elements of our cybersecurity risk management program include, but are not limited to, the following:
• risk assessments designed to help identify material risks from cybersecurity threats to our critical systems and information;
• oversight of cybersecurity risks and controls by our CRC, including oversight of the management of cybersecurity incidents by designated incident response personnel, in coordination with IT security and other functions, as appropriate;
• the use of external service providers, where appropriate, to assess, test or otherwise assist with aspects of our security processes, as discussed further below;
22
• cybersecurity awareness training of our employees, including incident response personnel and senior management;
• a response plan that includes procedures for responding to cybersecurity incidents; and
• a third-party risk management process for key service providers based on our assessment of their criticality to our operations and respective risk profile.
We have adopted a risk-based strategy to assess and manage cybersecurity risks associated with third parties. We prioritize our cybersecurity efforts relating to third parties based on the likelihood and potential impact of cybersecurity threats. This includes reviewing the security protocols of key vendors, service providers, and external users of our systems.
The CRC engages third-party expertise from time to time as it deems necessary or appropriate to test our cybersecurity defenses, to evaluate the cybersecurity programs of current and potential vendors and service providers, and to seek specialized legal advice regarding cybersecurity.
Since at least January 1, 2022 , we are not aware of any cybersecurity incidents that have materially affected the Company. Nonetheless, we face risks from cybersecurity threats that, if realized, are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our operations, business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. See "Risk Factors – The unauthorized access, use, theft or destruction of tenant or employee personal, financial or other data, or of Regency's proprietary or confidential information stored in our information systems or by third parties on our behalf, could impact operations, and expose us to potential liabilities and material adverse financial impact."
Cybersecurity Governance
The Audit Committee of the Board is charged with overseeing our cybersecurity risk management program. Both the CRC Chair and the CISO, serving in distinct roles, provide the Audit Committee with regular updates. These updates cover the overall status of the Company’s cybersecurity program, as well as developments and potential new risks and trends. In the event of a significant cybersecurity threat or incident, the CRC would escalate communication frequency and intensity with the Audit Committee, Board, and the Company’s Executive Committee (discussed below).
The Audit Committee reports to the full Board regarding its activities, including those related to cybersecurity. Board members also receive presentations periodically on cybersecurity topics from internal security staff and external experts as part of the Board’s continuing education.
As designated by the Company’s Executive Committee and the Audit Committee, our CRC leads Regency's cybersecurity risk management program. This includes risk identification, assessment, management, prevention and mitigation, as well as securing necessary resources and reporting on cybersecurity preparedness to the Executive Committee (which is currently comprised of the CEO, CFO, and several of the Company’s other senior leaders) and the Audit Committee.
CRC membership, which is subject to change from time to time, includes management leadership possessing a diverse range of education, experience and expertise, and currently includes the Company’s CISO, chief accounting officer, head of internal audit, general counsel and chief compliance officer, head of litigation, head of human resources, head of IT operations and the manager of network security. The collective experience of this committee encompasses areas such as IT, network security, change and incident management, public company governance, accounting, financial controls, insurance, risk management, third-party vendor oversight and systems integration, communications, human capital, and legal matters including securities, privacy and technology contracting.
Our CRC takes steps to stay informed about and monitor efforts to prevent, detect, mitigate, and remediate cybersecurity risks and incidents through various means. These include briefings from internal security personnel; threat intelligence and other information obtained from governmental, public and private sources, including external consultants engaged by us; and alerts and reports generated by security tools deployed in our IT environment.
23
Item 2. P roperties
The following table is a list of our shopping centers, summarized by state and in order of largest holdings by number of properties, presented for consolidated properties (excludes properties owned by unconsolidated real estate partnerships):
December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
Location
Number of
Properties
GLA (in
thousands)
Percent of
Total GLA
Percent
Leased
Number of
Properties
GLA (in
thousands)
Percent of
Total GLA
Percent
Leased
Florida
86
10,630
23.0
%
96.2
%
86
10,558
24.2
%
96.5
%
California
62
9,304
20.2
%
94.9
%
55
8,355
19.0
%
96.0
%
Connecticut
41
3,876
8.4
%
95.8
%
43
3,924
8.9
%
94.1
%
Texas
28
3,679
8.0
%
95.7
%
27
3,518
8.0
%
96.9
%
New York
41
3,468
7.5
%
94.5
%
42
3,339
7.6
%
93.3
%
Georgia
22
2,152
4.7
%
96.7
%
22
2,125
4.8
%
97.3
%
New Jersey
17
1,621
3.5
%
96.0
%
17
1,585
3.6
%
97.0
%
Colorado
14
1,259
2.7
%
96.1
%
13
1,097
2.5
%
97.9
%
North Carolina
10
1,226
2.7
%
97.7
%
10
1,226
2.8
%
98.5
%
Ohio
8
1,213
2.6
%
98.9
%
8
1,224
2.8
%
98.7
%
Illinois
6
1,090
2.4
%
98.2
%
6
1,085
2.5
%
94.8
%
Virginia
7
1,040
2.3
%
97.4
%
6
943
2.1
%
98.3
%
Washington
10
961
2.1
%
98.0
%
10
962
2.2
%
96.3
%
Massachusetts
8
905
2.0
%
97.1
%
8
898
2.0
%
97.4
%
Oregon
7
747
1.6
%
95.8
%
7
741
1.7
%
95.3
%
Tennessee
4
638
1.4
%
98.7
%
3
314
0.7
%
100.0
%
Pennsylvania
5
591
1.3
%
97.3
%
4
447
1.0
%
97.3
%
Indiana
3
428
0.9
%
96.5
%
1
289
0.7
%
100.0
%
Missouri
4
408
0.9
%
99.3
%
4
408
0.9
%
98.9
%
Maryland
3
313
0.7
%
89.9
%
2
289
0.7
%
89.9
%
Minnesota
2
246
0.5
%
84.4
%
2
246
0.6
%
84.4
%
Delaware
1
233
0.5
%
93.3
%
1
229
0.5
%
97.1
%
South Carolina
1
51
0.1
%
100.0
%
1
51
0.1
%
100.0
%
District of Columbia
1
23
0.0
%
100.0
%
1
23
0.1
%
100.0
%
Total
391
46,102
100.0
%
96.0
%
379
43,876
100.0
%
96.2
%
The weighted average annual effective rent for the consolidated portfolio of properties, net of tenant concessions, is $26.55 and $25.56 per square foot ("PSF") as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
24
The following table is a list of our shopping centers, summarized by state and in order of largest holdings by number of properties, presented for unconsolidated properties (properties owned by our unconsolidated real estate partnerships):
December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
Location
Number of
Properties
GLA (in
thousands)
Percent of
Total GLA
Percent
Leased
Number of
Properties
GLA (in
thousands)
Percent of
Total GLA
Percent
Leased
California
16
2,293
18.6
%
97.0
%
17
2,319
17.4
%
98.4
%
Virginia
11
1,701
13.9
%
96.4
%
14
1,982
14.8
%
94.1
%
North Carolina
7
1,245
10.1
%
97.8
%
7
1,240
9.2
%
98.3
%
Washington
7
881
7.2
%
92.1
%
7
874
6.5
%
95.6
%
Maryland
8
826
6.7
%
97.4
%
9
848
6.3
%
96.1
%
Texas
5
808
6.6
%
98.2
%
6
959
7.1
%
95.4
%
Colorado
5
783
6.4
%
94.0
%
6
858
6.4
%
96.9
%
Illinois
5
781
6.4
%
99.5
%
5
777
5.8
%
99.7
%
Florida
6
669
5.5
%
99.2
%
6
669
5.0
%
98.4
%
New York
5
644
5.2
%
94.5
%
5
786
5.8
%
96.6
%
Minnesota
3
422
3.4
%
99.4
%
3
422
3.1
%
99.2
%
Pennsylvania
3
391
3.2
%
96.5
%
6
664
4.9
%
97.3
%
New Jersey
3
223
1.8
%
96.0
%
4
300
2.2
%
91.1
%
Connecticut
1
195
1.6
%
100.0
%
1
189
1.4
%
98.1
%
Rhode Island
1
159
1.3
%
100.0
%
1
159
1.2
%
97.0
%
Oregon
1
93
0.8
%
93.8
%
1
93
0.7
%
97.5
%
South Carolina
1
80
0.7
%
100.0
%
1
80
0.6
%
100.0
%
Delaware
1
64
0.5
%
94.6
%
1
64
0.5
%
94.6
%
District of Columbia
1
17
0.1
%
100.0
%
1
17
0.1
%
100.0
%
Indiana
—
—
0.0
%
0.0
%
2
139
1.0
%
91.6
%
Total
90
12,275
100.0
%
96.8
%
103
13,439
100.0
%
96.8
%
The weighted average annual effective rent for the unconsolidated portfolio of properties, net of tenant concessions, is $25.87 and $24.51 PSF as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
25
The following table summarizes our top tenants occupying our shopping centers for consolidated properties plus our share of unconsolidated properties, as of December 31, 2025, based upon a percentage of total annualized base rent (GLA and dollars in thousands):
Tenant
GLA
Percent of
Company
Owned GLA
Annualized
Base Rent
Percent of
Annualized
Base Rent
Number of
Leased Stores
Publix
2,940
5.8
%
$
36,191
2.9
%
67
TJX Companies, Inc.
1,840
3.6
%
33,760
2.7
%
76
Albertsons Companies, Inc.
2,053
4.1
%
33,619
2.7
%
52
Amazon/Whole Foods
1,312
2.6
%
31,808
2.5
%
39
Kroger Co.
2,978
5.9
%
31,292
2.5
%
51
Ahold Delhaize
924
1.8
%
23,189
1.8
%
20
CVS
808
1.6
%
21,942
1.7
%
66
JPMorgan Chase Bank
225
0.4
%
12,548
1.0
%
63
Trader Joe's
346
0.7
%
12,156
1.0
%
32
L.A. Fitness Sports Club
516
1.0
%
11,311
0.9
%
14
Nordstrom
402
0.8
%
11,134
0.9
%
12
Starbucks
160
0.3
%
10,424
0.8
%
99
H.E. Butt Grocery Company
706
1.4
%
10,125
0.8
%
8
Ross Dress For Less
587
1.2
%
9,692
0.8
%
25
Target
919
1.8
%
9,387
0.7
%
8
Bank of America
163
0.3
%
9,088
0.7
%
41
Gap, Inc
259
0.5
%
8,805
0.7
%
20
Wells Fargo Bank
152
0.3
%
8,711
0.7
%
49
JAB Holding Company
168
0.3
%
7,282
0.6
%
59
Walgreens Boots Alliance
255
0.5
%
6,796
0.5
%
22
Petco Health and Wellness Company
275
0.5
%
6,762
0.5
%
26
Ulta
224
0.4
%
6,680
0.5
%
25
Xponential Fitness
163
0.3
%
6,650
0.5
%
97
Kohl's
526
1.0
%
6,389
0.5
%
7
Five Below
209
0.4
%
5,977
0.5
%
27
Top Tenants
19,110
37.5
%
$
371,718
29.4
%
1,005
Our leases for tenant space under 10,000 square feet generally have initial terms ranging from three to seven years. Leases greater than 10,000 square feet ("Anchor Leases") generally have initial lease terms in excess of five years and are mostly comprised of Anchor Tenants. Many of the leases contain provisions allowing the tenant the option of extending the term of the lease at expiration. Our leases typically provide for the payment of fixed base rent, the tenant’s Pro-rata share of real estate taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance ("CAM") expenses, and reimbursement for utility costs if not directly metered.
26
The following table summarizes Pro-rata lease expirations (per their terms) for the next ten years and thereafter, for our consolidated and unconsolidated properties, assuming no tenants renew their leases (GLA and dollars of In Place Annual Base Rent Expiring Under Leases in thousands):
Lease Expiration Year
Number of Tenants with Expiring Leases
Pro-rata Expiring GLA
Percent of Total Company GLA
In Place Annual Base Rent Expiring Under Leases
Percent of In Place Annual Base Rent
Pro-rata Expiring Average Annual Base Rent PSF
(1)
109
223
0.5
%
$
6,333
0.5
%
$
28.42
2026
1,021
2,990
6.3
%
85,068
6.9
%
28.45
2027
1,437
6,239
13.1
%
159,240
12.9
%
25.52
2028
1,367
5,989
12.6
%
163,974
13.3
%
27.38
2029
1,269
6,743
14.2
%
161,851
13.1
%
24.00
2030
1,233
5,956
12.5
%
160,295
13.0
%
26.91
2031
765
4,338
9.1
%
106,611
8.7
%
24.58
2032
503
2,178
4.6
%
65,033
5.3
%
29.87
2033
494
2,193
4.6
%
66,046
5.4
%
30.11
2034
417
1,870
3.9
%
55,125
4.5
%
29.48
2035
544
2,444
5.1
%
67,241
5.5
%
27.52
Thereafter
443
6,349
13.5
%
134,293
10.9
%
21.15
Total
9,602
47,512
100.0
%
$
1,231,110
100.0
%
$
25.91
(1) Leases currently under month-to-month rent or in process of renewal.
During 2026, we have a total of 1,021 leases expiring by their terms, representing 3.0 million square feet of GLA. These expiring leases have an average base rent of $28.45 PSF. The average base rent of new leases signed during 2025 was $36.02 PSF. During periods of macroeconomic uncertainty or weakness, when the percent of our space leased is relatively low, and/or when supply of retail space for lease generally exceeds demand, tenants have more bargaining power, which may result in rental rate declines on new or renewal leases. In periods of macroeconomic strength, when the percent of space leased is relatively high, and/or when supply/demand metrics for retail space favor landlords, we have more bargaining power, which generally results in rental rate growth on new and renewal leases.
Demand for retail space in high quality, community centers located in trade areas with compelling demographics remained strong in 2025 and into early 2026, especially among business operators with a history of success and growing innovative business concepts. However, inflationary challenges and the potential for macroeconomic uncertainty or weakness could result in pressure on base rent growth for new and renewal leases as businesses seek to manage these challenges and uncertainties.
27
The following table lists information about our consolidated and unconsolidated properties. For further information, see "Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations " of this Report.
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Amerige Heights Town Center
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2000
2000
$
—
97
100.0%
$
34.00
Albertsons, (Target)
Bloom on Third
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
35%
2018
1992/ in process
150,092
73
100.0%
60.81
Whole Foods, CVS, Citibank, Dick's
Brea Marketplace
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
40%
2005
1987
—
352
97.6%
21.31
24 Hour Fitness, Big 5 Sporting Goods, Childtime Childcare, Old Navy, Sprout's, Target, Smart Parke
Bridgepark Plaza
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2025
2021
17,383
102
98.7%
45.58
Albertsons
Circle Center West
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2017
1989
—
63
100.0%
41.16
Marshalls
Circle Marina Shops & Mrktplc. (fka Circle Marina Center)
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2019
1994
—
117
89.1%
39.66
Sprouts, Big 5 Sporting Goods, Centinela Feed & Pet Supplies
Culver Center
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2017
2000
—
217
89.9%
35.02
Ralphs, Best Buy, LA Fitness, Sit N' Sleep
Culver Commons (7)
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2025
2025
—
13
65.5%
89.35
0
El Camino Shopping Center
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
1999
2017
—
136
100.0%
45.24
Bristol Farms, CVS
Granada Village
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
40%
2005
2012
49,194
226
92.9%
29.85
Sprout's Markets, PETCO, Homegoods, Burlington, TJ Maxx
Hasley Canyon Village
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2003
2003
16,000
70
93.0%
27.98
Ralphs
Heritage Plaza
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
1999
2012
—
230
100.0%
47.72
Ralphs, CVS, Daiso, Mitsuwa Marketplace, Big 5 Sporting Goods
Mercantile East
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2025
2023
33,000
239
100.0%
33.28
Trader Joe's, EOS Fitness, Lucky Strike
Mercantile West
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2025
2025
40,600
150
100.0%
38.04
Stater Brothers
Morningside Plaza
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
1999
1996
—
91
98.8%
26.92
Stater Bros.
Newland Center
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
1999
2016
—
152
100.0%
34.32
Albertsons
Nohl Plaza (6)
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2023
1966
—
104
97.2%
19.44
Vons
Plaza Hermosa
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
1999
2013
—
95
100.0%
32.75
Von's, CVS
Ralphs Circle Center
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2017
1983
—
60
98.5%
33.58
Ralphs
Rona Plaza
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
1999
1989
—
52
100.0%
23.12
Superior Super Warehouse
Seal Beach
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
20%
2002
1966
—
102
97.0%
29.62
Pavilions, CVS
Sendero Marketplace
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2025
2016
44,538
82
100.0%
49.81
Gelson's
Talega Village Center
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2017
2007
—
102
95.5%
23.72
Ralphs
Terrace Shops
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2025
2005
14,007
41
100.0%
43.40
Tustin Legacy
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2016
2017
—
112
100.0%
37.14
Stater Bros, CVS
Twin Oaks Shopping Center
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
40%
2005
2019
19,000
98
100.0%
26.18
Ralphs, Ace Hardware
Valencia Crossroads
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2002
2003
—
180
98.6%
30.52
Whole Foods, Kohl's
Village at La Floresta
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2014
2014
—
87
93.2%
39.00
Whole Foods
Von's Circle Center
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
2017
1972
2,633
151
95.4%
29.14
Von's, Ross Dress for Less, Planet Fitness
Woodman Van Nuys
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim
CA
1999
1992
—
108
98.6%
18.09
El Super
Silverado Plaza
Napa
CA
40%
2005
1974
15,477
85
95.7%
28.12
Nob Hill, CVS
Gelson's Westlake Market Plaza
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
CA
2002
2016
—
85
94.7%
33.20
Gelson's Markets, John of Italy Salon & Spa
Oakbrook Plaza
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
CA
1999
2017
—
83
91.3%
22.21
Gelson's Markets, (CVS), (Ace Hardware)
Westlake Village Plaza and Center
Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura
CA
1999
2015
—
201
98.0%
45.47
Von's, Sprouts, (CVS)
French Valley Village Center
Rvrside-San Bernardino-Ontario
CA
2004
2004
—
114
100.0%
29.27
Stater Bros, CVS
Oak Valley Village (7)
Rvrside-San Bernardino-Ontario
CA
75%
2025
2025
—
230
74.3%
8.90
Sprouts, Target
Oakshade Town Center
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
CA
2011
1998
2,369
104
98.3%
20.85
Safeway, Sierra, Planet Fitness
Prairie City Crossing
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
CA
1999
1999
—
90
100.0%
23.63
Safeway
Raley's Supermarket
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
CA
20%
2007
1964
—
63
100.0%
15.68
Raley's
The Marketplace
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom
CA
2017
1990
—
111
100.0%
28.09
Safeway, CVS, Petco
4S Commons Town Center
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
93%
2004
2004
—
265
100.0%
34.97
Restoration Hardware Outlet, Ace Hardware, Cost Plus World Market, CVS, Jimbo's
Naturally!, Ralphs, ULTA
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Balboa Mesa Shopping Center
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
2012
2014
—
207
100.0%
31.16
CVS, Kohl's, Von's
El Norte Pkwy Plaza
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
1999
2013
—
91
97.3%
21.14
Von's, Children's Paradise, ACE Hardware
Friars Mission Center
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
1999
1989
—
147
100.0%
42.18
Ralphs, CVS
Navajo Shopping Center
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
40%
2005
1964
11,000
102
96.4%
18.17
Albertsons, O'Reilly Auto Parts, Dollar Tree
Point Loma Plaza
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
40%
2005
1987
38,593
205
91.4%
24.17
Von's, Marshalls, UFC Gym
Rancho San Diego Village
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
40%
2005
1981
—
153
95.2%
27.37
Smart & Final, 24 Hour Fitness, (Longs Drug)
Scripps Ranch Marketplace
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
2017
2017
—
132
100.0%
37.28
Vons, CVS
The Hub Hillcrest Market
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
2012
2015
—
149
91.3%
47.12
Ralphs, Trader Joe's
Twin Peaks
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad
CA
1999
2015
—
208
98.1%
23.41
Target, Grocer
Bayhill Shopping Center
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
40%
2005
2019
28,800
122
99.2%
29.56
CVS, Mollie Stone's Market
Clayton Valley Shopping Center
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2003
2004
—
260
94.5%
23.98
Grocery Outlet, Central, CVS, Dollar Tree, Ross Dress For Less
Diablo Plaza
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
1999
1982
—
63
90.8%
45.90
Bevmo!, (Safeway), (CVS)
El Cerrito Plaza
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2000
2000
—
256
72.4%
34.02
PETCO, Ross Dress For Less, Trader Joe's, Marshalls, (CVS)
Ellis Village Center (7)
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2025
2025
—
49
85.6%
39.14
Sprouts
Encina Grande
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
1999
2016
—
106
100.0%
37.89
Whole Foods, Walgreens
Oakley Shops at Laurel Fields (7)
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2024
2024
—
78
95.5%
32.10
Safeway
Persimmon Place
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2014
2014
—
153
100.0%
40.91
Whole Foods, Nordstrom Rack, Homegoods
Plaza Escuela
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2017
2002
—
154
100.0%
43.51
The Container Store, Trufusion, Talbots, The Cheesecake Factory, Barnes & Noble
Pleasant Hill Shopping Center
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
40%
2005
2016
50,000
231
100.0%
26.07
Target, Burlington, Ross Dress for Less, Homegoods
Potrero Center
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2017
1997
—
227
70.9%
35.01
Safeway, 24 Hour Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Petco
Powell Street Plaza
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2001
1987
—
170
100.0%
38.54
Trader Joe's, Bevmo!, Ross Dress For Less, Marshalls, Old Navy
San Carlos Marketplace
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2017
2018
—
154
87.2%
39.93
TJ Maxx, Best Buy, PetSmart, Bassett Furniture
San Leandro Plaza
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
1999
1982
—
50
100.0%
40.49
(Safeway), (CVS)
Serramonte Center
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2017
2018/In Process
—
1,085
96.4%
28.41
Buy Buy Baby, Cost Plus World Market, Crunch Fitness, DAISO, Dave & Buster's, Dick's Sporting Goods, Divano Homes, H&M, Macy's, Nordstrom Rack, Old Navy, Party City, Ross Dress for Less, Target, TJ Maxx, Uniqlo, Jagalchi, Koi Palace
Tassajara Crossing
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
1999
1990
—
146
98.3%
27.44
Safeway, CVS, Alamo Hardware
Willows Shopping Center (6)
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
2017
in process
—
233
85.2%
31.78
REI, Old Navy, Ulta, Five Below, Airport Home Appliance
Woodside Central
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
1999
1993
—
81
100.0%
31.34
Chuck E. Cheese, Marshalls, (Target)
Ygnacio Plaza
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley
CA
40%
2005
1968
25,850
110
100.0%
42.25
Sports Basement,TJ Maxx
Blossom Valley
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara
CA
1999
1992
22,300
98
100.0%
28.59
Safeway, Dollar Tree
Mariposa Shopping Center
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara
CA
40%
2005
2020
26,950
127
97.7%
23.88
Safeway, CVS, Ross Dress for Less
Shoppes at Homestead
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara
CA
1999
1983
—
116
98.2%
28.14
CVS, Crunch Fitness, (Orchard Supply Hardware)
Snell & Branham Plaza
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara
CA
40%
2005
1988
19,048
99
98.6%
22.60
Safeway
The Pruneyard
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara
CA
2019
2014
—
260
94.6%
44.95
Trader Joe's, The Sports Basement, Camera Cinemas, Marshalls
West Park Plaza
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara
CA
1999
1996
—
88
100.0%
23.64
Safeway, Crunch Fitness
Golden Hills Plaza
San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles
CA
2006
2017
—
256
88.4%
8.47
Lowe's, TJ Maxx, Trader Joe's
Five Points Shopping Center
Santa Maria-Santa Barbara
CA
40%
2005
2014
—
145
97.6%
32.98
Smart & Final, CVS, Ross Dress for Less, Big 5 Sporting Goods, PETCO
Corral Hollow
Stockton
CA
2000
2000
—
153
100.0%
19.47
Safeway, CVS, Crunch Fitness
Alcove On Arapahoe
Boulder
CO
40%
2005
1957/2019
26,390
160
93.6%
21.22
Petco, HomeGoods, Safeway, Ulta Salon, DSW
Crossroads Commons
Boulder
CO
20%
2001
1986
34,500
143
90.3%
31.47
Whole Foods, Barnes & Noble
29
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Crossroads Commons II
Boulder
CO
20%
2018
1995
5,500
18
100.0%
43.55
(Whole Foods), (Barnes & Noble)
Falcon Marketplace
Colorado Springs
CO
2005
2005
—
22
100.0%
29.88
(Wal-Mart)
Marketplace at Briargate
Colorado Springs
CO
2006
2006
—
29
100.0%
38.59
(King Soopers)
Monument Jackson Creek
Colorado Springs
CO
1998
1999
—
85
98.4%
13.75
King Soopers
Woodmen Plaza
Colorado Springs
CO
1998
1998
—
116
97.6%
14.64
King Soopers
Applewood Shopping Ctr
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
40%
2005
2017/2020
—
366
94.4%
16.89
Applejack Liquors, Hobby Lobby, Homegoods, King Soopers, PetSmart, Sierra Trading Post, Ulta, Three Little Mingos, Crunch Fitness
Belleview Square
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
2004
2013
—
117
100.0%
23.82
King Soopers
Boulevard Center
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
1999
1986
—
81
94.5%
33.91
Eye Care Specialists, (Safeway)
Buckley Square
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
1999
1978
—
116
98.9%
13.32
Ace Hardware, King Soopers
Cherrywood Square Shop Ctr
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
40%
2005
1978
9,650
97
97.5%
13.07
King Soopers
Hilltop Village
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
2002
2018
—
101
98.7%
14.14
King Soopers
Littleton Square
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
1999
2015
—
99
97.5%
12.73
King Soopers
Lloyd King Center
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
1998
1998
—
83
100.0%
13.00
King Soopers
Lone Tree Village (7)
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
2025
2025
—
158
81.2%
7.38
King Soopers
Shops at Quail Creek
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
2008
2008
—
38
85.0%
31.31
(King Soopers)
Stroh Ranch
Denver-Aurora-Lakewood
CO
1998
1998
—
93
100.0%
15.28
King Soopers
Centerplace of Greeley III
Greeley
CO
2007
2007
—
119
100.0%
13.32
Hobby Lobby, Best Buy, TJ Maxx
22 Crescent Road
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2017
1984
—
4
100.0%
69.00
-
470 Main Street
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1972
—
22
91.6%
32.85
-
91 Danbury Road
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2017
1965
—
5
100.0%
31.26
0
970 High Ridge Center
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1960
—
26
94.0%
37.60
BevMax
Airport Plaza
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1974
—
33
100.0%
31.56
-
Bethel Hub Center
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1957
—
31
85.3%
18.32
La Placita Bethel Market
Black Rock
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
80%
2014
1996
14,939
98
94.0%
33.29
Old Navy, The Clubhouse
Brick Walk (6)
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
80%
2014
2007
30,234
122
97.3%
47.81
-
Compo Acres Shopping Center
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2017
2011
—
43
95.9%
58.23
Trader Joe's
Compo Shopping Center
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2024
1953
—
71
97.4%
57.76
CVS
Copps Hill Plaza
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2017
2002
—
173
88.1%
22.65
Stop & Shop, Homegoods, Marshalls, Rite Aid, Michael's
Cos Cob Commons
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1986
—
48
91.3%
54.05
CVS
Cos Cob Plaza
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1947
3,577
15
92.2%
60.19
-
Danbury Green
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2017
2006
—
124
89.1%
27.72
Trader Joe's, Hilton Garden Inn, DSW, Staples, Warehouse Wines & Liquors
Danbury Square
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1987
—
194
98.9%
12.03
Ocean State Job Lot, Planet Fitness, Elicit Brewing Company, Hobby Lobby
Darinor Plaza (6)
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2017
1978
—
154
100.0%
20.69
Kohl's, Old Navy, Ulta
Fairfield Center (6)
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
80%
2014
2000
—
95
98.4%
40.40
Fairfield University Bookstore, Merril Lynch, Merrit Hospitality
Fairfield Crossroads
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1995
—
62
100.0%
25.28
Marshalls, DSW
Greenwich Commons
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1961
4,461
10
100.0%
93.92
-
High Ridge Center
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
100%
2023
1968
10,000
93
100.0%
51.74
Trader Joe's, Barnes & Noble
Knotts Landing
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1994
—
6
100.0%
77.89
-
Main & Bailey
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1950
—
60
82.0%
28.70
-
Newfield Green
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1966
18,175
74
100.0%
42.02
Grade A Market, CVS
Old Greenwich CVS
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
100%
2023
1941
799
8
100.0%
45.00
-
Old Kings Market
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1955
22,111
96
98.8%
43.08
Stop & Shop
Post Road Plaza
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2017
1978
—
20
100.0%
60.80
Trader Joe's
Ridgeway Shopping Center
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1952
40,688
359
97.0%
31.18
Stop & Shop, LA Fitness, Marshalls, Michael's, Staples, Old Navy, ULTA, DSW
30
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Shelton Square
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1982
—
189
98.4%
20.18
Stop & Shop, Homegoods, Hawley Lane, Edge Fitness
Station Centre @ Old Greenwich
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1952
—
39
96.6%
37.52
Kings Food Markets
The Dock-Dockside
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1974
32,125
278
98.9%
19.73
Stop & Shop, BJ's Whole Sale, Edge Fitness, West Marine, Petco, Dollar Tree, Osaka Hibachi
The Hub at Norwalk
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2017
2003
—
146
100.0%
23.66
HomeGoods, Target
Westport Collection
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2023
1958
—
40
51.3%
27.48
BevMax
Westport Row
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk
CT
2017
1988
—
95
100.0%
46.19
The Fresh Market, Pottery Barn
Brookside Plaza
Hartford-E Hartford-Middletown
CT
2017
2006
—
226
96.5%
16.69
Burlington Coat Factory, PetSmart, ShopRite, Staples, TJ Maxx, LL Bean
Corbin's Corner
Hartford-E Hartford-Middletown
CT
40%
2005
2015
53,000
195
100.0%
33.00
Best Buy, Edge Fitness, Old Navy, The Tile Shop, Total Wine and More, Trader Joe's
Aldi Square
New Haven-Milford
CT
2023
2014
—
38
88.9%
16.87
Aldi
Orange Meadows
New Haven-Milford
CT
2023
1990
—
84
100.0%
25.65
Trader Joe's, TJMaxx, Bob's Discount Furniture, Ulta
Southbury Green
New Haven-Milford
CT
2017
2002
—
156
91.4%
24.50
ShopRite, Homegoods
The Shops at Stone Bridge
New Haven-Milford
CT
2024
2025
—
156
97.0%
31.65
Whole Foods, TJ Maxx, Barnes & Noble
New Milford Plaza
Torrington
CT
2023
1970
—
235
93.3%
10.53
Walmart, Stop & Shop, Dollar Tree
Sunny Valley Shops
Torrington
CT
2023
2003
—
72
93.3%
12.74
Staples, Planet Fitness
Veterans Plaza
Torrington
CT
2023
1966
—
80
100.0%
12.94
Big Y World Class Market, BevMax
Shops at The Columbia
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
DC
2006
1991
—
23
100.0%
40.55
Trader Joe's
Spring Valley Shopping Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
DC
40%
2005
1930
12,897
17
100.0%
100.25
-
Pike Creek
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
DE
1998
2013
—
233
93.3%
18.72
Acme Markets, Edge Fitness, Pike Creek Community Hardware
Shoppes of Graylyn
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
DE
40%
2005
1971
—
64
94.6%
28.62
Lidl
Corkscrew Village
Cape Coral-Fort Myers
FL
2007
1997
—
82
96.1%
16.21
Publix
Shoppes of Grande Oak
Cape Coral-Fort Myers
FL
2000
2000
—
79
100.0%
19.14
Publix
Millhopper Shopping Center
Gainesville
FL
1993
2017
—
80
97.7%
19.80
Publix
Newberry Square
Gainesville
FL
1994
1986
—
181
95.2%
11.21
Publix, Floor & Décor, Dollar Tree
Anastasia Plaza
Jacksonville
FL
1993
in-process
—
103
97.7%
27.16
Publix
Atlantic Village
Jacksonville
FL
2017
2014
—
110
100.0%
20.11
LA Fitness, Pet Supplies Plus
Brooklyn Station on Riverside
Jacksonville
FL
2013
2013
—
50
97.6%
30.53
The Fresh Market
Courtyard Shopping Center
Jacksonville
FL
1993
1987
—
137
100.0%
3.68
Target, (Publix)
East San Marco
Jacksonville
FL
2007
2022
—
59
100.0%
28.74
Publix
Fleming Island
Jacksonville
FL
1998
2000
—
136
98.5%
18.56
Publix, PETCO, Planet Fitness, (Target)
Hibernia Pavilion
Jacksonville
FL
2006
2006
—
51
100.0%
16.95
Publix
John's Creek Center
Jacksonville
FL
20%
2003
2004
12,000
82
100.0%
17.77
Publix
Julington Village
Jacksonville
FL
20%
1999
1999
10,000
82
100.0%
18.47
Publix, (CVS)
Mandarin Landing
Jacksonville
FL
2017
2024
—
140
100.0%
23.17
Whole Foods, Aveda Institute, Baptist Health, Cooper's Hawk
Nocatee Town Center
Jacksonville
FL
2007
2017
—
114
100.0%
24.58
Publix
Oakleaf Commons
Jacksonville
FL
2006
2006
—
77
100.0%
18.12
Publix
Old St Augustine Plaza
Jacksonville
FL
1996
2017/2020
—
248
100.0%
11.77
Publix, Burlington Coat Factory, Hobby Lobby, LA Fitness, Ross Dress for Less
Pablo Plaza
Jacksonville
FL
2017
2020
—
162
100.0%
19.69
Whole Foods, Office Depot, Marshalls, HomeGoods, PetSmart
Pine Tree Plaza
Jacksonville
FL
1997
1999
—
63
100.0%
16.20
Publix
Seminole Shoppes
Jacksonville
FL
50%
2009
2018
7,500
87
98.6%
25.83
Publix
Shoppes at Bartram Park
Jacksonville
FL
50%
2005
2017
—
135
97.8%
23.92
Publix, (Kohl's), (Tutor Time)
Shops at John's Creek
Jacksonville
FL
2003
2004
—
15
100.0%
29.78
-
South Beach Regional
Jacksonville
FL
2017
1990
—
305
99.2%
19.47
Trader Joe's, Home Depot, Ross Dress for Less, Staples, Nordstrom Rack, TJ Maxx
31
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Starke (6)
Jacksonville
FL
2000
2000
—
13
0.0%
-
-
The Village at Seven Pines (7)
Jacksonville
FL
2025
2025
—
239
57.5%
29.54
Publix, West Elm
Avenida Biscayne
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
in-process
—
142
100.0%
61.08
DSW, Jewelry Exchange, Old Navy, The Fresh Market
Aventura Shopping Center
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
1994
2017
—
97
100.0%
40.62
CVS, Publix
Banco Popular Building
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1971
—
5
100.0%
92.31
-
Bird 107 Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1990
—
40
100.0%
24.73
Walgreens
Bird Ludlam
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1998
—
192
96.9%
27.92
CVS, Goodwill, Winn-Dixie
Boca Village Square
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2014
—
92
100.0%
24.64
CVS, Publix
Boynton Lakes Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
1997
2012
—
110
95.9%
18.01
Citi Trends, Pet Supermarket, Publix
Boynton Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2015
—
105
99.1%
22.43
CVS, Publix
Caligo Crossing
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2007
2007
—
15
100.0%
45.82
(Kohl's)
Chasewood Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
1993
2015
—
152
97.0%
30.17
Publix, Pet Smart
Concord Shopping Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1993
—
309
100.0%
15.47
Big Lots, Dollar Tree, Home Depot, Winn-Dixie, YouFit Health Club
Coral Reef Shopping Center
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1990
—
75
98.7%
35.07
Aldi, Walgreens
Country Walk Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2008
—
101
99.7%
28.62
Publix, CVS
Countryside Shops
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1991/2018
—
186
97.9%
24.40
Publix, Ross Dress for Less, Painted Tree Boutique
Fountain Square
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2013
2013
—
177
100.0%
30.91
Publix, Ross Dress for Less, TJ Maxx, Ulta, (Target)
Gardens Square
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
1997
1991
—
90
96.1%
19.85
Publix
Greenwood Shopping Centre
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1994
—
133
97.4%
18.40
Publix, Bealls
Pine Island
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1999
—
255
91.4%
17.67
Publix, YouFit Health Club, Floor and Décor, Advanced Veterinary Care Center
Pine Ridge Square
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2013
—
118
97.6%
22.90
The Fresh Market, Marshalls, Ulta, Nordstrom Rack
Pinecrest Place (6)
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2017
—
70
98.3%
44.57
Whole Foods, (Target)
Point Royale Shopping Center
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2018
—
202
99.0%
17.45
Winn-Dixie, Burlington Coat Factory, Pasteur Medical Center, Planet Fitness, Dollar Tree
Prosperity Centre
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1993
—
124
98.8%
26.64
Plum Market, TJ Maxx, CVS
Sawgrass Promenade
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1998
—
107
89.9%
15.70
Publix, Walgreens, Dollar Tree
Sheridan Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1991/2022
—
507
93.8%
21.41
Publix, Kohl's, LA Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Pet Supplies Plus, Burlington, Marshalls
Shoppes @ 104
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
1998
2018
—
127
100.0%
23.33
Fresco y Mas, CVS
Shoppes at Lago Mar
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1995
—
83
94.3%
17.53
Publix, YouFit Health Club
Shoppes of Jonathan's Landing
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1997
—
27
100.0%
33.94
(Publix)
Shoppes of Oakbrook
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2003
—
183
59.8%
22.21
Publix, Duffy's Sports Bar, CVS
Shoppes of Silver Lakes
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
1997
—
127
99.2%
22.70
Publix, Goodwill
Shoppes of Sunset
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2009
—
22
81.9%
30.22
-
Shoppes of Sunset II
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2009
—
28
100.0%
26.16
-
Shops at Skylake
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2006
—
287
98.2%
27.04
Publix, LA Fitness, TJ Maxx, Goodwill, Pasteur Medical
University Commons (6)
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2015
2001
—
180
100.0%
35.87
Whole Foods, Nordstrom Rack, Barnes & Noble, Bed Bath & Beyond
Waterstone Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2005
—
61
100.0%
19.24
Publix
Welleby Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
1996
1982
—
110
96.8%
16.38
Publix, Dollar Tree
Wellington Town Square
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
1996
2022
—
108
97.0%
26.33
Publix, CVS
West Bird Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2000/2021
—
99
98.2%
28.26
Publix
West Lake Shopping Center
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2000
—
101
100.0%
24.23
Fresco y Mas, CVS
Westport Plaza
Miami-Ft Lauderdale-PompanoBch
FL
2017
2002
—
47
100.0%
24.07
Publix
Berkshire Commons
Naples-Marco Island
FL
1994
1992
—
110
98.9%
16.59
Publix, Walgreens
Naples Walk
Naples-Marco Island
FL
2007
1999
—
125
95.8%
19.69
Publix
32
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Pavilion
Naples-Marco Island
FL
2017
2011
—
168
96.2%
25.28
LA Fitness, Paragon Theaters, J. Lee Salon Suites
Shoppes of Pebblebrook Plaza
Naples-Marco Island
FL
50%
2000
2000
—
80
100.0%
17.98
Publix, (Walgreens)
Alafaya Village
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
FL
2017
1986
—
39
100.0%
27.82
-
Kirkman Shoppes
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
FL
2017
2015
—
115
97.6%
27.87
LA Fitness, Walgreens
Lake Mary Centre
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
FL
2017
2015
—
356
96.0%
19.40
The Fresh Market, Academy Sports, Hobby Lobby, LA Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Office Depot
Plaza Venezia
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
FL
20%
2016
2000
55,000
203
99.5%
36.07
Publix, Eddie V's
Town and Country
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
FL
2017
1993
—
78
100.0%
12.20
Ross Dress for Less
Unigold Shopping Center
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
FL
2017
1987
—
115
91.2%
16.35
YouFit Health Club, Ross Dress for Less
Willa Springs
Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford
FL
2000
1979
16,700
90
100.0%
25.90
Publix
Cashmere Corners
Port St. Lucie
FL
2017
2016
—
86
100.0%
17.91
WalMart
The Plaza at St. Lucie West
Port St. Lucie
FL
2017
2006
—
27
100.0%
28.25
-
Charlotte Square
Punta Gorda
FL
2017
1980
—
91
91.1%
12.24
WalMart, Buffet City
Ryanwood Square
Sebastian-Vero Beach
FL
2017
1987
—
115
91.1%
12.73
Publix, Beall's, Harbor Freight Tools
South Point
Sebastian-Vero Beach
FL
2017
2003
—
72
100.0%
16.70
Publix
Treasure Coast Plaza
Sebastian-Vero Beach
FL
2017
1983
—
134
100.0%
19.92
Publix, TJ Maxx
Carriage Gate
Tallahassee
FL
1994
2013
—
73
100.0%
26.56
Trader Joe's, TJ Maxx
Ocala Corners (6)
Tallahassee
FL
2000
2000
—
93
96.0%
15.02
Publix
Bloomingdale Square
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater
FL
1998
2021
—
252
99.5%
21.69
Bealls, Dollar Tree, Home Centric, LA Fitness, Publix
Northgate Square
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater
FL
2007
1995
—
75
100.0%
17.72
Publix
Regency Square
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater
FL
1993
2013
—
362
98.3%
21.83
AMC Theater, Dollar Tree, Five Below, Marshalls, Michael's, PETCO, Shoe Carnival, TJ Maxx, Ulta, Old Navy, (Best Buy), (Macdill)
Shoppes at Sunlake Centre
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater
FL
2017
2008
—
117
100.0%
28.12
Publix
Suncoast Crossing (6)
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater
FL
2007
2007
—
122
100.0%
7.77
Kohl's, (Target)
The Village at Hunter's Lake
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater
FL
2018
2018
—
72
100.0%
29.96
Sprouts
Town Square
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater
FL
1997
1999
—
44
100.0%
36.71
PETCO, Barnes & Noble
Village Center
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater
FL
1995
2014
—
186
100.0%
23.98
Publix, PGA Tour Superstore, Walgreens
Westchase
Tampa-St Petersburg-Clearwater
FL
2007
1998
—
79
100.0%
18.64
Publix
Ashford Place
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
1993
—
53
100.0%
26.85
Harbor Freight Tools
Briarcliff La Vista
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
1962
—
45
75.5%
19.24
Michael's
Briarcliff Village
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
1990
—
189
92.1%
17.94
Burlington, Publix, Shoe Carnival, TJ Maxx
Bridgemill Market
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
2017
2000
—
89
90.7%
20.16
Publix
Brighten Park
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
2016
—
137
91.3%
29.42
Lidl, Big Blue Swim School, Kohl's
Buckhead Court
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
1984
—
49
98.1%
34.33
-
Buckhead Landing
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
2017
1998/2024
—
152
98.7%
34.60
Binders Art Supplies & Frames, Publix, Golf Galaxy
Buckhead Station
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
2017
1996
—
241
98.4%
27.68
Cost Plus World Market, DSW Warehouse, Nordstrom Rack, Old Navy, Saks Off 5th, TJ Maxx, Ulta, Bloomingdale's Outlet, Gold's Gym
Cambridge Square
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1996
in-process
—
74
100.0%
27.59
Publix
Chastain Square
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
2017
2001
—
92
100.0%
24.65
Publix
Cornerstone Square
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
1990
—
80
90.7%
19.85
Aldi, Barking Hound Village, CVS, HealthMarkets Insurance
Dunwoody Hall
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
1986
13,800
90
100.0%
22.43
Publix
Dunwoody Village
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
1975
—
121
97.1%
23.70
The Fresh Market, Walgreens, Dunwoody Prep
Howell Mill Village
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
2004
1984
—
96
100.0%
26.24
Publix
Paces Ferry Plaza
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
2018
—
82
100.0%
43.34
Whole Foods
Powers Ferry Square
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
2013
—
102
100.0%
37.61
HomeGoods, PETCO
Powers Ferry Village
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1997
1994
—
69
100.0%
10.97
Publix, Barrel Town
Russell Ridge
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1994
1995
—
112
98.8%
13.56
Kroger
Sandy Springs
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
2012
2006
—
113
97.8%
28.78
Trader Joe's, Fox's, Peter Glenn Ski & Sports
33
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Sope Creek Crossing
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
1998
2016
—
99
98.1%
18.07
Publix
The Shops at Hampton Oaks
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
2017
2009
—
21
93.3%
14.17
(CVS)
Williamsburg at Dunwoody
Atlanta-SandySprings-Alpharett
GA
2017
1983
—
45
98.2%
27.24
-
Civic Center Plaza
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
40%
2005
1989
22,000
265
100.0%
11.84
Super H Mart, Home Depot, O'Reilly Automotive, King Spa
Clybourn Commons
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
2014
1999
—
32
100.0%
38.91
PETCO
Glen Oak Plaza
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
2010
1967
—
63
100.0%
28.31
Trader Joe's, Walgreens, Northshore University Healthsystems
Hinsdale Lake Commons
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
1998
2015
—
185
97.4%
17.75
Whole Foods, Goodwill, Charter Fitness, Petco
Mellody Farm
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
2017
2017
—
259
97.2%
32.35
Whole Foods, Nordstrom Rack, REI, HomeGoods, Barnes & Noble, West Elm
Naperville Plaza
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
20%
2023
1961
22,123
115
100.0%
29.26
Casey's Foods, Trader Joe's, Oswald's Pharmacy
Old Town Square
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
20%
2023
1998
10,000
87
95.9%
27.60
Jewel-Osco
Riverside Sq & River's Edge
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
40%
2005
1986
—
169
100.0%
19.62
Mariano's Fresh Market, Dollar Tree, Blink Fitness, Five Below
Roscoe Square
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
40%
2005
2012
24,500
144
100.0%
25.14
Mariano's Fresh Market, Walgreens, Altitude Trampoline Park
Westchester Commons
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
2001
2014
—
148
95.2%
20.17
Mariano's Fresh Market, Goodwill
Willow Festival (6)
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IL
2010
2007
—
404
100.0%
19.90
Whole Foods, Lowe's, CVS, HomeGoods, REI, Ulta, Restoration Hardware
Shops on Main
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin
IN
94%
2007
2017/2020
—
289
82.5%
18.27
Whole Foods, Dick's Sporting Goods, Ross Dress for Less, HomeGoods, DSW, Nordstrom Rack, Marshalls
Willow Lake Shopping Center
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson
IN
2005
1987
—
86
84.5%
18.53
Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles, Snipes USA, (Kroger)
Willow Lake West Shopping Center
Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson
IN
2005
2001
—
53
100.0%
29.03
Trader Joe's
Fellsway Plaza
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
MA
75%
2013
2016
33,727
161
98.0%
27.97
Stop & Shop, Planet Fitness, BioLife Plasma Services
Shaw's at Plymouth
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
MA
2017
1993
—
60
100.0%
19.34
Shaw's
Shops at Saugus
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
MA
2006
2006
—
94
100.0%
30.37
Trader Joe's, La-Z-Boy, PetSmart
Star's at Cambridge
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
MA
2017
1997
—
66
100.0%
41.18
Star Market
Star's at West Roxbury
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
MA
2017
2006
—
76
100.0%
28.00
Shaw's
The Abbot
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
MA
2017
1912/2024
—
64
76.7%
102.01
Center for Effective Alturism
Twin City Plaza
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
MA
2006
in process
—
285
100.0%
25.80
Shaw's, Marshall's, Extra Space Storage, Walgreens, K&G Fashion, Dollar Tree, Everfitness, Formlabs
The Longmeadow Shops
Springfield, MA
MA
2023
1962
13,000
99
92.0%
33.92
CVS
Festival at Woodholme
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson
MD
40%
2005
1986
18,510
81
96.5%
41.59
Trader Joe's
Parkville Shopping Center
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson
MD
40%
2005
2013
23,017
165
96.4%
18.16
Giant, Parkville Lanes, Dollar Tree, Petco, The Cellar Parkville
Southside Marketplace
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson
MD
40%
2005
2011
24,800
125
97.8%
25.80
Giant
Village at Lee Airpark (6)
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson
MD
2005
2014
—
118
100.0%
32.98
Giant, (Sunrise)
Burnt Mills
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
MD
20%
2013
2004
—
31
94.6%
41.67
Trader Joe's
Cloppers Mill Village
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
MD
40%
2005
1995
—
137
95.6%
19.99
Shoppers Food Warehouse, Dollar Tree
Firstfield Shopping Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
MD
2005
2014
—
22
100.0%
46.75
-
Takoma Park
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
MD
40%
2005
1960
—
107
100.0%
14.78
Planet Fitness, Hibachi Grill & Buffet
Watkins Park Plaza
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
MD
40%
2005
1985
—
111
98.6%
30.76
LA Fitness, CVS
Westbard Square
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
MD
2017
2001/2024
—
173
98.4%
40.47
Giant, Bowlmor AMF
Woodmoor Shopping Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
MD
40%
2005
1954
18,410
68
98.6%
39.71
CVS
Apple Valley Square
Minneapol-St. Paul-Bloomington
MN
2006
1998
—
179
78.7%
19.18
PETCO, Savers,(Burlington Coat Factory), (Aldi)
Cedar Commons
Minneapol-St. Paul-Bloomington
MN
2011
1999
—
66
100.0%
31.14
Whole Foods
Colonial Square
Minneapol-St. Paul-Bloomington
MN
40%
2005
2014
19,700
93
98.6%
28.99
Lund's
Rockford Road Plaza
Minneapol-St. Paul-Bloomington
MN
40%
2005
1991
—
204
100.0%
15.21
Kohl's, PetSmart, HomeGoods, TJ Maxx, ULTA
34
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Rockridge Center
Minneapol-St. Paul-Bloomington
MN
20%
2011
2006
10,000
125
98.9%
15.20
CUB Foods
Brentwood Plaza
St. Louis
MO
2007
2002
—
60
97.8%
11.79
Schnucks
Bridgeton
St. Louis
MO
2007
2005
—
71
100.0%
13.02
Schnucks, (Home Depot)
Dardenne Crossing
St. Louis
MO
2007
1996
—
67
97.9%
11.53
Schnucks
Kirkwood Commons
St. Louis
MO
2007
2000
—
210
100.0%
10.44
Walmart, TJ Maxx, HomeGoods, Famous Footwear, (Target), (Lowe's)
Blakeney Town Center
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
NC
2021
2006
—
384
99.4%
28.12
Harris Teeter, Marshalls, Best Buy, Petsmart, Off Broadway Shoes, Old Navy, (Target)
Carmel Commons
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
NC
1997
2012
—
146
89.2%
26.36
Chuck E. Cheese, The Fresh Market, Edwin Watts Golf
Cochran Commons
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
NC
20%
2007
2003
—
66
98.2%
18.53
Harris Teeter, (Walgreens)
Willow Oaks
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia
NC
2014
2014
—
65
100.0%
18.63
Publix
Shops at Erwin Mill
Durham-Chapel Hill
NC
55%
2012
2012
12,000
91
100.0%
21.61
Harris Teeter
Southpoint Crossing
Durham-Chapel Hill
NC
1998
1998
—
103
93.4%
18.10
Harris Teeter
Village Plaza
Durham-Chapel Hill
NC
20%
2012
2020
11,227
73
88.8%
27.72
Whole Foods
Woodcroft Shopping Center
Durham-Chapel Hill
NC
1996
1984
—
90
98.4%
15.67
Food Lion, ACE Hardware
Glenwood Village
Raleigh-Cary
NC
1997
1983
—
43
100.0%
20.87
Harris Teeter
Holly Park
Raleigh-Cary
NC
2013
1969
—
158
99.0%
21.98
DSW Warehouse, Trader Joe's, Ross Dress For Less, Staples, US Fitness Products, Jerry's Artarama, Pet Supplies Plus, Ulta
Lake Pine Plaza
Raleigh-Cary
NC
1998
1997
—
88
100.0%
15.64
Harris Teeter
Market at Colonnade Center
Raleigh-Cary
NC
2009
2009
—
58
100.0%
29.30
Whole Foods
Midtown East
Raleigh-Cary
NC
50%
2017
2017
36,000
159
100.0%
26.91
Wegmans
Ridgewood Shopping Center
Raleigh-Cary
NC
20%
2018
1951
8,480
95
98.3%
32.60
Whole Foods, Walgreens
Shoppes of Kildaire
Raleigh-Cary
NC
40%
2005
1986
20,000
145
100.0%
22.27
Trader Joe's, Aldi, Staples, Barnes & Noble
Sutton Square
Raleigh-Cary
NC
20%
2006
1985
—
101
87.2%
24.88
The Fresh Market
Village District
Raleigh-Cary
NC
30%
2004
2018
75,000
606
99.4%
27.53
Harris Teeter, The Fresh Market, The Oberlin, Wake Public Library, Walgreens, Talbots, Great Outdoor Provision Co., York Properties,The Cheshire Cat Gallery, Crunch Fitness Select Club, Bailey's Fine Jewelry, Sephora, Barnes & Noble, Goodnight's Comedy Club, Ballard Designs
Bloomfield Crossing
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
0
—
59
100.0%
16.51
Superfresh
Boonton ACME Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1999
10,123
63
100.0%
25.71
Acme Markets
Cedar Hill Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1971
6,585
43
96.5%
33.30
Walgreens
Chestnut Ridge Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1965
—
76
97.4%
31.80
Fresh Market, Drop Fitness
Chimney Rock (6)
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2016
2016
—
218
100.0%
37.64
Whole Foods, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Off 5th, The Container Store, Ulta, LL Bean
District at Metuchen
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
20%
2018
2017
16,000
67
100.0%
33.39
Whole Foods
Emerson Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1981
—
90
100.0%
18.81
Shoprite, K-9 Resorts Luxury Pet Hotel
Ferry Street Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1995
8,131
108
100.0%
23.82
Seabra Foods, Flaming Grill
Franklin Pointe (fka Rite Aid Plaza-Waldwick Plaza)
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1953
—
20
0.0%
-
-
Glenwood Green
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
70%
2023
2024
—
352
97.1%
13.95
ShopRite, Target, Rendina
H Mart Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1967
—
7
100.0%
48.64
-
Meadtown Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1961
8,765
77
89.6%
27.51
Marshalls, Petco, Walgreens
Midland Park Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1966
16,588
129
88.0%
25.69
Kings Food Markets, Crunch Fitness
Plaza Square
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
40%
2005
1990
—
102
91.3%
21.04
Grocer, Retro Fitness
Pompton Lakes Towne Square
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
2000
—
66
94.5%
27.63
Planet Fitness
South Pass Village
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1965
19,258
109
100.0%
32.74
Acme Markets
35
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Valley Ridge Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1962
15,702
103
100.0%
30.60
Whole Foods
Waldwick Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
2023
1960
—
27
100.0%
28.51
-
Washington Commons
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NJ
100%
2023
1992
8,210
74
94.2%
24.29
Stop & Shop
Haddon Commons
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
NJ
40%
2005
1985
—
54
100.0%
16.25
Acme Markets
111 Kraft Avenue
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1902
—
9
100.0%
50.80
-
1175 Third Avenue
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2017
1995
—
23
100.0%
112.26
Whole Foods, Five Below
1225-1239 Second Ave
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2017
1987
—
19
100.0%
85.03
Dumbo Market
260-270 Sawmill Road
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1953
—
3
100.0%
1.69
-
27 Purchase Street
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
0
—
10
82.6%
44.88
-
410 South Broadway
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1936
—
7
100.0%
1.21
-
48 Purchase Street
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
0
—
6
100.0%
84.91
-
90 - 30 Metropolitan Avenue
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2017
2007
—
60
100.0%
36.15
Michaels, Staples, Trader Joe's
Arcadian Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1978
—
166
97.9%
24.61
Stop & Shop, Westchester Community College, The 19th Hole
Armonk Square
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
20%
2025
2013
11,403
48
97.9%
45.76
DeCicco & Sons
Biltmore Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1967
—
17
100.0%
42.78
-
Broadway Plaza (6)
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2017
2014
—
147
93.2%
42.93
Aldi, Best Buy, Bob's Discount Furniture, TJ Maxx, Blink Fitness
Carmel ShopRite Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1981
—
145
89.4%
15.42
Shoprite, Box Office Cinema, Gold's Gym
Chilmark Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1963
—
47
95.7%
35.51
CVS
Clocktower Plaza Shopping Ctr (6)
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2017
1995
—
79
96.9%
52.63
Stop & Shop
DeCicco's Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1978
—
70
100.0%
40.70
Decicco & Sons
District Shops of Pelham Manor
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1960
—
25
74.5%
37.15
Manor Market
East Meadow Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
in-process
—
138
89.5%
30.09
Lidl, Dollar Deal
Eastchester Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1963
—
24
100.0%
39.61
CVS
Eastport
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2021
1980
—
48
88.0%
17.64
King Kullen
Gateway Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
50%
2023
0
14,000
198
100.0%
9.80
Walmart, Bob's Discount Furniture
Harrison Shopping Square
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1958
—
26
95.2%
37.10
The Goddard School
Heritage 202 Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1989
—
19
100.0%
37.61
-
Hewlett Crossing I & II
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2018
1954
—
52
83.1%
43.25
-
Lake Grove Commons
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
40%
2012
2008
48,558
141
100.0%
38.56
Whole Foods, LA Fitness
Lakeview Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1981
10,407
165
90.3%
18.82
Acme, Planet Fitness, Montclare Children's School
McLean Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
100%
2023
1982
5,000
58
98.1%
22.57
Acme Markets
Midway Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
12%
2023
1958
20,144
244
86.0%
28.94
Shoprite, Amazing Savings, CVS, Planet Fitness, Denny's Kids, Ulta
New City PCSB Bank Pad
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1973
—
3
100.0%
105.14
-
Orangetown Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
100%
2023
1966
—
76
96.5%
23.15
CVS
Purchase Street Shops
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
0
—
6
100.0%
38.80
-
Putnam Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1971
16,531
189
87.7%
16.94
Tops, Dollar World, Harbor Freight Tools
Riverhead Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
50%
2023
0
—
13
100.0%
39.46
-
Rivertowns Square
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2018
2016
—
116
100.0%
29.63
Ulta, The Learning Experience, Mom's Organic Market, Look Cinemas
Somers Commons
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
2003
—
135
91.9%
21.59
Level Fitness, Tractor Supply, Goodwill
Staples Plaza-Yorktown Heights
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1970
—
125
100.0%
21.30
Level Fitness, Staples, Party City, Extra Space Storage
Tanglewood Shopping Center
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1953
2,163
28
93.1%
45.86
-
The Gallery at Westbury Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2017
2013
—
312
98.4%
54.33
Trader Joe's, Nordstrom Rack, Saks Fifth Avenue, Bloomingdale's, The Container Store, HomeGoods, Old Navy, Gap Outlet, Bassett Home Furnishings, Famous Footwear
36
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
The Meadows
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2021
1980
—
141
99.3%
17.66
Marshalls, Stew Leonard's, Net Cost Market, Catch Air
The Point at Garden City Park (6)
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2016
2018
—
105
100.0%
33.33
King Kullen, Ace Hardware
The Shops at SunVet (6) (7)
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
100%
2023
2023
—
170
73.5%
46.40
Whole Foods, Nordstrom Rack
Towne Centre at Somers
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1988
—
84
100.0%
32.82
CVS
Valley Stream
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2021
1950
—
99
97.8%
32.15
King Kullen
Village Commons
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2023
1980
—
28
86.9%
42.13
-
Wading River
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2021
2002
—
99
94.7%
24.34
King Kullen, CVS, Ace Hardware
Westbury Plaza
New York-Newark-Jersey City
NY
2017
2004
88,000
390
100.0%
28.36
WalMart, Costco, Marshalls, Total Wine and More, Olive Garden
Cherry Grove
Cincinnati
OH
1998
2012
—
203
100.0%
13.78
Kroger, Shoe Carnival, TJ Maxx, Tuesday Morning
Hyde Park
Cincinnati
OH
1997
1995
—
398
98.6%
17.62
Kroger, Kohl's, Walgreens, Ace Hardware, Staples, Marshalls, Five Below
Red Bank Village
Cincinnati
OH
2006
2018
—
183
100.0%
8.40
WalMart
Regency Commons
Cincinnati
OH
2004
2004
—
34
84.0%
28.02
-
West Chester Plaza
Cincinnati
OH
1998
in process
—
67
100.0%
7.18
Kroger
East Pointe
Columbus
OH
1998
2014
—
115
100.0%
11.84
Kroger
Kroger New Albany Center
Columbus
OH
1999
1999
—
96
100.0%
14.55
Kroger
Northgate Plaza (Maxtown Road)
Columbus
OH
1998
2017
—
117
97.6%
12.34
Kroger, (Home Depot)
Corvallis Market Center
Corvallis
OR
2006
2006
—
85
100.0%
23.60
Michaels, TJ Maxx, Trader Joe's
Northgate Marketplace
Medford
OR
2011
2011
—
81
96.3%
25.54
Trader Joe's, REI, PETCO
Northgate Marketplace Ph II
Medford
OR
2015
2015
—
177
96.4%
18.24
Dick's Sporting Goods, Homegoods, Marshalls
Greenway Town Center
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
OR
40%
2005
2014
—
93
93.8%
17.04
Dollar Tree, Rite Aid, Whole Foods
Murrayhill Marketplace
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
OR
1999
2016
—
157
92.7%
22.20
Safeway, Planet Fitness
Sherwood Crossroads
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
OR
1999
1999
—
88
91.9%
12.71
Safeway
Tanasbourne Market (6)
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
OR
2006
2006
—
71
100.0%
33.18
Whole Foods
Walker Center
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro
OR
1999
1987
—
89
95.7%
28.62
REI
Lower Nazareth Commons
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton
PA
2007
2012
—
110
100.0%
28.38
Burlington Coat Factory, PETCO, (Wegmans), (Target)
Stefko Boulevard Shopping Center (6)
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton
PA
2005
1976
—
134
97.9%
12.53
Valley Farm Market, Dollar Tree, Muscle Inc. Gym
Hershey (6)
Harrisburg-Carlisle
PA
2000
2000
—
6
100.0%
33.75
-
Baederwood Shopping Center
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
PA
80%
2023
1999
24,365
117
100.0%
29.62
Whole Foods, Planet Fitness
City Avenue Shopping Center
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
PA
40%
2005
1960
—
157
95.6%
22.19
Ross Dress for Less, TJ Maxx, Dollar Tree
Gateway Shopping Center
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
PA
2004
2016
—
224
94.0%
38.16
Trader Joe's, Staples, TJ Maxx
Mercer Square Shopping Center
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
PA
40%
2005
1988
—
91
100.0%
24.12
Weis Markets, McCaffrey's Food Markets
Newtown Square Shopping Center
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington
PA
40%
2005
2020
19,774
142
95.3%
21.31
Acme Markets, Michael's
East Greenwich Square
Boston-Cambridge-Newton
RI
70%
2024
1990
26,000
159
100.0%
21.68
Dave's Fresh Marketplace, Les Isle Rose
Indigo Square
Charleston-North Charleston
SC
2017
2017
—
51
100.0%
32.58
Greenwise (Vac 8/29/20)
Merchants Village
Charleston-North Charleston
SC
40%
1997
1997
9,000
80
100.0%
19.70
Publix
Brentwood Place
Nashvil-Davdsn-Murfree-Frankln
TN
2025
2007/2016
43,500
319
98.6%
20.90
TJ Maxx/Homegoods, Golf Galaxy, Stock & Tade Design Co.
Harpeth Village Fieldstone
Nashvil-Davdsn-Murfree-Frankln
TN
1997
1998
—
70
100.0%
18.34
Publix
Northlake Village
Nashvil-Davdsn-Murfree-Frankln
TN
2000
2013
—
139
100.0%
16.45
Kroger
Peartree Village
Nashvil-Davdsn-Murfree-Frankln
TN
1997
1997
—
110
96.6%
19.91
Kroger, PETCO
Hancock
Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown
TX
1999
1998
—
246
97.8%
20.63
24 Hour Fitness, H.E.B, PETCO, Twin Liquors
Market at Round Rock
Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown
TX
1999
1987
—
123
96.9%
21.35
Sprout's Markets, Office Depot, Tuesday Morning, Party Chaos
North Hills
Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown
TX
1999
1995
—
164
98.8%
24.00
H.E.B.
37
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
Shops at Mira Vista
Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown
TX
2014
2002
137
68
100.0%
27.76
Trader Joe's, Champions Westlake Gymnastics & Cheer
Tech Ridge Center
Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown
TX
2011
2020
—
240
96.6%
22.33
H.E.B., Pinstack, Baylor Scott & White
University Commons - Austin
Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown
TX
20%
2024
2024
34,500
218
98.4%
21.90
HEB
Bethany Park Place
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
1998
1998
10,200
99
100.0%
12.43
Kroger
CityLine Market
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
2014
2014
—
81
100.0%
31.18
Whole Foods
CityLine Market Phase II
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
2015
2015
—
22
100.0%
29.41
CVS
Hillcrest Village
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
1999
1991
—
15
100.0%
55.58
-
Keller Town Center
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
1999
2014
—
120
90.4%
17.54
Tom Thumb
Lebanon/Legacy Center
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
2000
2002
—
57
100.0%
32.44
(WalMart)
Market at Preston Forest
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
1999
1990
—
96
100.0%
23.99
Tom Thumb
Mockingbird Commons
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
1999
1987
—
120
98.0%
22.67
Tom Thumb, Ogle School of Hair Design
Preston Oaks (6)
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
2013
2022
—
103
100.0%
42.32
Central Market, Talbots
Prestonbrook
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
1998
1998
—
92
98.5%
16.10
Kroger
Shiloh Springs
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington
TX
1998
1998
—
113
100.0%
15.97
Kroger
Alden Bridge
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2002
1998
26,000
143
97.4%
21.94
Kroger, Walgreens
Baybrook East
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2020
2025
—
166
95.8%
15.86
H.E.B
Cochran's Crossing
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2002
1994
—
138
87.9%
20.70
Kroger
Indian Springs Center
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2002
2003
—
140
100.0%
27.35
H.E.B.
Jordan Ranch
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
50%
2024
2025
—
162
96.6%
22.04
HEB
Market at Springwoods Village
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2016
2018
—
167
98.0%
18.56
Kroger
Panther Creek
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2002
1994
—
170
76.0%
29.18
CVS, The Woodlands Childrens Museum, Fitness Project, Sprouts
Sienna Grande Shops (7)
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
75%
2023
2023
—
30
65.3%
35.54
-
Southpark at Cinco Ranch
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2012
2017
—
265
100.0%
15.04
Kroger, Academy Sports, PETCO, Spec's Liquor and Finer Foods
Sterling Ridge
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2002
2000
—
129
78.6%
27.98
CVS, Crunch Fitness
Sweetwater Plaza
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
20%
2001
2000
20,000
135
100.0%
17.41
Kroger, Walgreens
The Village at Riverstone
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2016
2016
—
165
95.8%
17.80
Kroger
Weslayan Plaza East
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
40%
2005
1969
—
173
100.0%
22.46
Berings, Ross Dress for Less, Michaels, The Next Level Fitness, Spec's Liquor, Trek Bicycle
Weslayan Plaza West
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
40%
2005
1969
—
186
97.1%
22.50
Randalls Food, Walgreens, PETCO, Homegoods, Barnes & Noble
Westwood Village
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
2006
2006
—
246
98.7%
20.16
Fitness Project, PetSmart, Office Max, Ross Dress For Less, TJ Maxx, Kelsey Seybold,(Target)
Woodway Collection
Houston-Woodlands-Sugar Land
TX
40%
2005
2012
25,696
97
94.2%
34.17
Whole Foods
Carytown Exchange
Richmond
VA
64%
2018
2022
—
116
97.6%
28.69
Publix, CVS
Village Shopping Center
Richmond
VA
40%
2005
1948
24,250
116
86.5%
27.41
Publix, CVS
Ashburn Farm Village Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
2005
1996
—
92
100.0%
18.72
Patel Brothers, The Shop Gym
Belmont Chase
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
2014
2014
—
91
100.0%
38.66
Cooper's Hawk Winery, Whole Foods
Festival at Manchester Lakes
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
40%
2005
2021
—
169
100.0%
33.02
Amazon Fresh, Homesense, Hyper Kidz
Fox Mill Shopping Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
40%
2005
2013
22,500
103
97.6%
28.49
Giant
Greenbriar Town Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
40%
2005
1972
76,200
344
99.5%
30.79
Big Blue Swim School, Bob's Discount Furniture, CVS, Giant, Marshalls, Planet Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Total Wine and More
Kamp Washington Shopping Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
40%
2005
1960
—
71
100.0%
36.27
PGA Tour Superstore
Kings Park Shopping Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
40%
2005
2015
21,800
96
100.0%
35.89
Giant, CVS
Lorton Station Marketplace
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
20%
2006
2005
—
136
91.4%
27.11
Amazon Fresh, Planet Fitness, Five Below, LLC
Point 50
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
2007
2021
—
48
94.0%
33.81
Amazon Fresh
Saratoga Shopping Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
40%
2005
1977
22,800
113
92.9%
23.37
Giant
Shops at County Center
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
2005
2005
—
106
100.0%
21.80
Harris Teeter, Planet Fitness
38
Property Name
CBSA (1)
State
Owner-
ship
Interest (2)
Year
Acquired
Year
Constructed
or Last Major
Renovation
Mortgages or
Encumbrances
(in 000's)
Gross
Leasable
Area
(GLA)
(in 000's)
Percent
Leased (3)
Average
Base Rent
PSF (4)
MajorTenant(s) (5)
The Crossing Clarendon
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
2016
in process/2023
—
420
94.8%
41.03
Whole Foods, Crate & Barrel, The Container Store, Pottery Barn, Ethan Allen, The Cheesecake Factory, LifeTime, Corobus Sports, Three Notch'd Brewing Company
The Field at Commonwealth
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
2017
2018
—
167
100.0%
24.47
Wegmans
Village Center at Dulles
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
20%
2002
1991
46,000
307
99.5%
31.37
Giant, CVS, Advance Auto Parts, Chuck E. Cheese, HomeGoods, Goodwill, Furniture Max, DMV Iron Gym
Willston Centre I
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
40%
2005
1952
—
109
81.2%
32.05
Fashion K City
Willston Centre II
Washington-Arlington-Alexandri
VA
40%
2005
2010
32,000
136
100.0%
29.77
Safeway, (Target), (PetSmart)
6401 Roosevelt
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
2019
1929
—
8
38.9%
26.86
-
Aurora Marketplace
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
40%
2005
1991
13,400
107
97.6%
19.00
Safeway, TJ Maxx
Ballard Blocks I
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
50%
2018
2007
—
132
100.0%
28.27
LA Fitness, Ross Dress for Less, Trader Joe's
Ballard Blocks II
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
50%
2018
2018
—
117
88.5%
35.06
Bright Horizons, Kaiser Permanente, PCC Community Markets, Trufusion, West Marine
Broadway Market
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
20%
2014
1988
—
140
93.6%
30.25
Gold's Gym, Mosaic Salon Group, Quality Food Centers
Cascade Plaza
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
20%
1999
1999
—
213
79.4%
13.06
Big 5 Sporting Goods, Dollar Tree, Planet Fitness, Ross Dress For Less, Safeway, Aaron's
Eastgate Plaza
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
40%
2005
2018/2021
22,000
85
100.0%
32.25
Safeway, Rite Aid
Grand Ridge Plaza
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
2012
2018
—
331
100.0%
27.99
Bevmo!, Dick's Sporting Goods, Marshalls, Regal Cinemas,Safeway, Ulta
Inglewood Plaza
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
1999
1985
—
17
100.0%
49.32
-
Island Village
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
2023
2013
—
106
100.0%
17.72
Safeway, Rite Aid
Klahanie Shopping Center
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
2016
1998
—
66
96.3%
40.78
(QFC)
Melrose Market
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
2019
2009
—
20
92.7%
48.79
-
Overlake Fashion Plaza
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
40%
2005
2020
—
86
99.0%
31.75
Marshalls, Bevmo!, Amazon Go Grocery
Pine Lake Village
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
1999
1989
—
102
98.6%
31.35
Quality Food Centers, Planet Fitness
Roosevelt Square
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
2017
2017
—
149
94.4%
29.18
Whole Foods, Guitar Center, LA Fitness
Sammamish-Highlands
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
1999
2013
—
100
99.5%
41.56
Trader Joe's, Bartell Drugs, (Safeway)
Southcenter
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue
WA
1999
1990
—
57
100.0%
37.95
(Target)
Regency Centers Total
$
2,309,064
58,377
96.1%
$
26.03
(1) CBSA refers to Core-Based Statistical Area (e.g. metropolitan area).
(2) Represents our percentage ownership interest in the property, if not wholly-owned.
(3) Percentages also include properties where we have not yet incurred at least 90% of the expected costs to complete development and the property is not yet 95% occupied or the anchor has not yet been open for at least two years ("development properties" or "properties in development"). However, if development properties were excluded, the total percent leased would be 94.9% for our Combined Portfolio of shopping centers.
(4) Average base rent PSF is calculated based on annual minimum contractual base rent per the tenant lease, excluding percentage rent and recovery revenue.
(5) Retailers in parenthesis are "shadow anchors" at our shopping centers (as described in Item 1A, "Risk Factors"). We have no ownership or leasehold interest in their space, which is adjacent to our property or on a parcel owned by the shadow anchor that appears to be part of our center.
(6) The ground underlying the building and improvements is not owned by Regency or its unconsolidated real estate partnerships, but is subject to a ground lease.
(7) Property in development.
39
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are a party to various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation, nor, to our knowledge, is any litigation threatened against us, the outcome of which would, in our judgment based on information currently available to us, have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations. However, no assurances can be given as to the outcome of any threatened or pending legal proceedings.
See Note 16 - Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes for discussion regarding material legal proceedings and contingencies.
Item 4. Mine Saf ety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related St ockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "REG."
As of February 04, 2026, there were 175,442 holders of our common stock.
We intend to pay regular quarterly distributions to Regency Centers Corporation's common shareholders. Future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon cash generated by our operating results, our financial condition, cash flows, capital requirements, future business prospects, annual dividend requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant. In order to maintain Regency Centers Corporation's qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we are generally required to make annual distributions equal to at least 90% of our REIT taxable income for the taxable year, excluding any net capital gains. Under certain circumstances we could be required to make distributions in excess of cash available for distributions in order to meet such requirements. We have a dividend reinvestment plan under which our shareholders may elect to reinvest their dividends automatically in common stock. Under the plan, we may elect to purchase common stock in the open market on behalf of shareholders or may issue new common stock to such shareholders.
Under the terms of our Line, in the event of any monetary default, we may not make distributions to shareholders except to the extent necessary to maintain our REIT status.
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2025.
The following table represents information with respect to purchases by the Parent Company of its common stock, by month, during the three months ended December 31, 2025:
Period
Total number of shares purchased (1)
Average price paid per share
Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs (2)
Maximum number or approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (in thousands) (2)
October 1 through October 31, 2025
144
$
72.90
—
$
250,000
November 1 through November 30, 2025
—
$
—
—
$
250,000
December 1 through December 31, 2025
—
$
—
—
$
250,000
(1) Represents shares repurchased to cover payment of withholding taxes in connection with restricted stock vesting by participants under Regency's Long-Term Omnibus Plan.
(2) On February 4, 2026, our Board approved a new common stock repurchase program, which replaced an existing program. The new program authorizes up to $500 million in repurchases, and the Company may purchase shares of its outstanding common stock through open market purchases and/or privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions and other factors. Any stock repurchased, if not retired, will be treated as treasury stock. The expiration date of the new repurchase program is February 28, 2029, unless modified, extended or earlier terminated by the Board in its discretion.
40
The performance graph furnished below shows Regency's cumulative total shareholder return relative to the S&P 500 Index, the FTSE Nareit Equity REIT Index, and the FTSE Nareit Equity Shopping Centers index since December 31, 2020. The following performance graph and table do not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other previous or future filings by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").
12/31/2020
12/31/2021
12/31/2022
12/31/2023
12/31/2024
12/31/2025
Regency Centers Corporation
$
100.00
171.39
148.15
165.58
190.21
184.91
S&P 500
100.00
128.71
105.40
133.10
166.40
196.16
FTSE NAREIT Equity REITs
100.00
143.24
108.34
123.21
133.97
137.83
FTSE NAREIT Equity Shopping Centers
100.00
165.05
144.36
161.74
189.29
182.01
Item 6. [Reserved ]
41
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Executing on our Strategy
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we had Net income attributable to common shareholders of $513.8 million as compared to $386.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase was primarily attributable to a $72.2 million gain recognized from a partial distribution-in-kind transaction and a $45.2 million increase in base rent from same properties, reflecting improved operating performance.
During the year ended December 31, 2025:
• Our Pro-rata same property NOI, excluding termination fees, grew 5.3%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, primarily attributable to improvements in base rent and recoveries from increases in year over year occupancy rates, contractual rent steps in existing leases, and positive rent spreads on comparable new and renewal leases.
• We executed 1,899 new and renewal leasing transactions representing 7.4 million Pro-rata SF with positive rent spreads of 10.8% during 2025, compared to 2,032 leasing transactions representing 9.9 million Pro-rata SF with positive rent spreads of 9.5% in 2024. Rent spreads are calculated on all executed leasing transactions for comparable Retail Operating Property spaces, including spaces vacant greater than 12 months.
• At December 31, 2025, our total property portfolio was 96.1% leased while our same property portfolio was 96.5% leased, compared to 96.3% and 96.6%, respectively, at December 31, 2024.
We continued our development and redevelopment of high-quality shopping centers:
• Estimated Pro-rata project costs of our current in process development and redevelopment projects totaled $597.4 million compared to $497.3 million at December 31, 2024.
• Development and redevelopment projects completed during 2025 represented $212.4 million of estimated net project costs, with an average stabilized yield of 10.1%. A stabilized yield for development and redevelopment projects represents the incremental NOI (estimated stabilized NOI less NOI prior to project commencement) divided by the total project costs.
We maintained liquidity and financial flexibility to cost effectively fund investment opportunities and debt maturities:
• In February 2025, the Company received a credit rating upgrade to A- with a stable outlook, from S&P Global Ratings. The Company maintains an A3 rating with a stable outlook from Moody’s Investors Service.
• In May 2025, the Company issued $400 million of senior unsecured notes due 2032, at a par value of 99.279% and a coupon of 5.0% (the "2025 Notes").
• In July 2025, as consideration for the acquisition of five operating properties, the Operating Partnership issued 2,773,087 Common Units, and assumed $150 million of secured mortgage debt with a weighted average interest rate of 4.2% and an average remaining term of approximately 12 years.
• The Company settled forward sales agreements entered into during 2024 under its At-the-Market ("ATM") program as follows:
o In August 2025, the Company issued 673,172 shares of common stock and received $49.2 million of net proceeds.
o In October 2025, the Company issued an additional 666,205 shares of common stock and received $49.1 million of net proceeds. Upon completion of these settlements, the Company had fully settled all forward sales agreements entered into during 2024.
• In October 2025, the Company received a property distribution from its Regency-GRI real estate investment partnership. The distribution involved 11 of the 66 properties within the partnership, and the Company received five of these properties, which had an aggregate fair value of $113.9 million. In addition, the Company assumed an existing fixed rate mortgage loan on one property of $10 million, maturing January 2026 with an interest rate of 3.95%. The remaining six properties were distributed to the Company's partner. The Company repaid the assumed mortgage loan in full in December 2025.
• In November 2025, the Company repaid $250 million of fixed-rate unsecured debt upon maturity.
• As of December 31, 2025, we had $441.8 million of loans maturing during the next 12 months, including Regency's share of maturities within our unconsolidated real estate partnerships, which we intend to refinance or pay off as they mature. Of this amount, $88.0 million was repaid at maturity on February 2, 2026.
• At December 31, 2025, we had $1.4 billion available on the Line, which expires on March 23, 2028 unless we exercise the available options to extend the expiration for the first of two additional consecutive six-month periods, in which case the term will be extended in accordance with any such option exercise.
42
Leasing Activity and Significant Tenants
We believe our high-quality, neighborhood and community shopping centers located in suburban trade areas with compelling demographics create attractive spaces for retail and service providers to operate their businesses.
Pro-rata Percent Leased
The following table summarizes Pro-rata percent leased of our combined consolidated and unconsolidated shopping center portfolio:
December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
Percent Leased – All properties
96.1
%
96.3
%
Anchor Space (spaces ≥ 10,000 SF)
98.0
%
98.4
%
Shop Space (spaces < 10,000 SF)
93.2
%
93.0
%
Pro-rata Leasing Activity
The following table summarizes leasing activity, including our Pro-rata share of activity within the portfolio of our real estate partnerships (totals as a weighted-average PSF):
Year Ended December 31, 2025
Leasing
Transactions
SF
(in thousands)
Base
Rent PSF
Tenant
Allowance
and Landlord
Work PSF
Leasing
Commissions
PSF
Anchor Space Leases
New
34
1,030
$
17.46
$
28.67
$
4.65
Renewal
102
3,050
15.14
0.65
0.41
Total Anchor Space Leases
136
4,080
$
15.73
$
7.72
$
1.48
Shop Space Leases
New
586
1,155
$
43.16
$
51.12
$
17.37
Renewal
1,177
2,214
40.89
1.45
1.30
Total Shop Space Leases
1,763
3,369
$
41.67
$
18.48
$
6.81
Total Leases
1,899
7,449
$
27.46
$
12.58
$
3.89
Year Ended December 31, 2024
Leasing
Transactions
SF
(in thousands)
Base
Rent PSF
Tenant
Allowance
and Landlord
Work PSF
Leasing
Commissions
PSF
Anchor Space Leases
New
39
952
$
20.06
$
61.64
$
6.77
Renewal
153
4,778
18.48
0.72
0.09
Total Anchor Space Leases
192
5,730
$
18.76
$
11.74
$
1.30
Shop Space Leases
New
598
1,415
$
39.91
$
44.11
$
14.58
Renewal
1,242
2,714
38.39
2.52
0.65
Total Shop Space Leases
1,840
4,129
$
38.92
$
16.98
$
5.49
Total Leases
2,032
9,859
$
27.19
$
13.93
$
3.05
The weighted-average base rent PSF on signed Shop Space leases during 2025 was $41.67 PSF, which is higher than the weighted average annual base rent PSF of all Shop Space leases due to expire during the next 12 months of $37.85 PSF. New and renewal rent spreads, compared to prior rents on these same spaces leased, were positive at 10.8% for the 12 months ended December 31, 2025, compared to 9.5% for the 12 months ended December 31, 2024.
43
Diversification and Concentration of Tenant Risk
We seek to reduce our risk by limiting concentration. For example, we utilize geographic diversification, as described in "Item 2. Properties " of this Report, and also seek to avoid dependence on any single property, market, or tenant. Based on percentage of annualized base rent, the following table summarizes our most significant tenants, of which four of the top five are grocers:
December 31, 2025
Anchor
Number of
Stores
Percentage of
Company-
owned GLA (1)
Percentage of
Annual
Base Rent (1)
Publix
67
5.8
%
2.9
%
TJX Companies, Inc.
76
3.6
%
2.7
%
Albertsons Companies, Inc.
52
4.1
%
2.7
%
Amazon/Whole Foods
39
2.6
%
2.5
%
Kroger Co.
51
5.9
%
2.5
%
(1) Includes Regency's share of unconsolidated properties and excludes those owned by anchors.
Bankruptcies and Credit Concerns
Our management team devotes significant time to researching and monitoring consumer preferences and trends, customer shopping behaviors, changes in delivery methods, shifts to e-commerce, and changing demographics in order to anticipate the challenges and opportunities impacting our industry. We seek to mitigate potentially adverse impacts through maintaining a high quality portfolio, diversifying our geographic and tenant mix, replacing less successful tenants with stronger operators, anchoring our centers with market leading grocery stores that drive customer traffic, and investing in suburban trade areas with compelling demographic populations benefiting from high levels of disposal income.
We recognize that current domestic and global economic policies and conditions such as tariffs, trade deal activity, inflation, labor cost and availability, energy prices, interest rate volatility, supply chain disruptions, access to and cost of credit, and tax and regulatory changes, have introduced additional business uncertainty to some of our tenants. These economic policies and conditions could place further financial strain on our tenants by impacting sales, raising costs and compressing margins. The impacts of these policies and conditions, which could included an economic downturn or recession, could negatively impact our tenants and their ability to continue to meet their lease obligations.
Although base rent is derived from long-term lease contracts, tenants that file for bankruptcy generally have the legal right to reject any or all of their leases and close related stores. Any unsecured claim we hold against a bankrupt tenant for unpaid rent might be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims. As a result, in a tenant bankruptcy situation it is likely that we would recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims we hold. Additionally, we may incur significant expense to adjudicate our claim and significant downtime to re-lease the vacated space. In the event that a tenant with a significant number of leases in our shopping centers files for bankruptcy and rejects its leases, we could experience a significant reduction in our revenues. As of December 31, 2025, the tenants who are currently in bankruptcy and continue to occupy space in our shopping centers represent an aggregate of 0.69% of our Pro-rata annual base rent with no single tenant exceeding 0.5% of Pro-rata annual base rent.
For a discussion and analysis of the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to the same period in 2023, see "Part II, Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations " of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2025.
44
Results of Operations
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024:
Changes in revenues are summarized in the following table:
(in thousands)
2025
2024
Change
Lease income
Base rent
$
1,049,767
986,916
62,851
Recoveries from tenants
376,248
345,145
31,103
Percentage rent
13,916
13,777
139
Uncollectible lease income
(2,793
)
(3,324
)
531
Other lease income
25,364
23,722
1,642
Straight-line rent
24,495
20,300
4,195
Above/below market rent amortization, net
24,428
24,843
(415
)
Total lease income
$
1,511,425
1,411,379
100,046
Other property income
13,741
14,651
(910
)
Management, transaction, and other fees
28,358
27,874
484
Total revenues
$
1,553,524
1,453,904
99,620
Lease income increased by $100.0 million primarily due to the following:
• $62.9 million increase in Base rent, mainly driven by the following:
o $45.2 million increase resulting from same properties, including:
▪ $25.7 million increase due to increases from occupancy, contractual rent steps in existing leases, and positive rental spreads on new and renewal leases;
▪ $14.0 million increase due to redevelopment projects that commenced operations in 2025; and
▪ $5.5 million increase related to our acquisitions of the remaining ownership interests in and resulting consolidation of properties previously held in unconsolidated real estate partnerships;
o $16.2 million increase from acquisitions of operating properties in 2025 as compared to 2024 activity; and
o $5.0 million increase from rent commencements at completed development properties; partially offset by
o $3.5 million decrease due to disposition of operating properties.
• $31.1 million increase from contractual Recoveries from tenants which represents their proportionate share of the operating, maintenance, insurance, and real estate tax expenses that we incur to operate our shopping centers. Recoveries from tenants increased, mainly from the following:
o $23.2 million increase primarily driven by higher operating costs and higher recovery rates due to increased occupancy in the current year;
o $6.5 million increase driven by the acquisition of operating properties in 2025 as compared to 2024 and rent commencements at development properties; and
o $2.0 million increase related to our acquisitions of the remaining ownership interests in and resulting consolidation of properties previously held in unconsolidated real estate partnerships; partially offset by
o $0.5 million decrease due to disposition of operating properties.
• $1.6 million increase in Other lease income mainly due to increase in lease termination fee income.
• $4.2 million increase in Straight-line rent mainly due to timing and degree of contractual rent steps and new lease commencements.
There were no significant changes in Other property income, or Management, transaction, and other fees.
Changes in our operating expenses are summarized in the following table:
(in thousands)
2025
2024
Change
Depreciation and amortization
$
405,044
394,714
10,330
Property operating expense
264,877
248,637
16,240
Real estate taxes
192,282
184,415
7,867
General and administrative
99,407
101,465
(2,058
)
Other operating expenses
8,849
10,867
(2,018
)
Total operating expenses
$
970,459
940,098
30,361
45
Depreciation and amortization increased by $10.3 million, mainly due to the following:
• $16.7 million increase from acquisitions of operating properties and development properties becoming available for occupancy; and
• $3.9 million increase related to acquisitions of the remaining ownership interests in and resulting consolidation of properties previously held in unconsolidated real estate partnerships; partially offset by
• $9.1 million decrease from same properties mainly driven by the timing of capital expenditures being placed in service within our redevelopment projects and accelerated amortization of certain early tenant move-outs; and
• $1.4 million decrease from dispositions of operating properties.
Property operating expense increased by $16.2 million, mainly due to the following:
• $11.7 million increase from same properties primarily due to higher recoverable common area maintenance, management and utility expenses;
• $4.1 million increase in acquisitions of operating properties and development properties; and
• $1.4 million increase related to our acquisitions of the remaining ownership interests in and resulting consolidation of properties previously held in unconsolidated real estate partnerships; partially offset by
• $1.0 million decrease due to disposition of operating properties.
Real estate taxes increased by $7.9 million, mainly due to the following:
• $5.4 million increase from same properties primarily due to increases in real estate tax assessments across the portfolio;
• $2.4 million increase from the acquisitions of other operating properties and development properties; and
• $1.0 million increase related to our acquisitions of the remaining ownership interests in and resulting consolidation of properties previously held in unconsolidated real estate partnerships; partially offset by
• $1.0 million decrease from dispositions of operating properties.
General and administrative costs decreased by $2.1 million, mainly due to the following:
• $8.5 million decrease due to higher overhead capitalization resulting from increased development, redevelopment and leasing activity; and
• $2.0 million decrease due to changes in the fair value of participant obligations within the deferred compensation plan, which were attributable to changes in the fair values of those investments recognized in Net investment income; partially offset by
• $5.4 million increase in compensation costs primarily driven by performance-based incentive compensation; and
• $3.0 million increase primarily attributable to higher costs in business promotion, charitable contributions, professional fees and other general and administrative expenses.
Other operating expenses decreased by $2.0 million, mainly due to the $7.7 million of transition costs recognized in 2024 related to the UBP acquisition, partially offset by $5.7 million increase in environmental reserve costs, development pursuit costs, and other fees.
Changes in Other expense, net are summarized in the following table:
(in thousands)
2025
2024
Change
Interest expense, net
Interest on notes payable
$
208,402
187,084
21,318
Interest on unsecured credit facilities
8,343
8,566
(223
)
Capitalized interest
(10,289
)
(6,627
)
(3,662
)
Hedge expense
784
728
56
Interest income
(7,692
)
(9,632
)
1,940
Interest expense, net
199,548
180,119
19,429
Provision for impairment of real estate
4,606
14,304
(9,698
)
Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax
(24,464
)
(34,162
)
9,698
Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt
—
180
(180
)
Net investment income
(4,077
)
(6,181
)
2,104
Total other expense, net
$
175,613
154,260
21,353
46
Interest expense, net increased by $19.4 million primarily due to the following:
• $21.3 million increase in Interest on notes payable primarily due to new net public debt issuances in 2025 at higher rates as compared to 2024; and
• $1.9 million decrease in Interest income primarily due to lower interest rates in 2025 as compared to 2024 as well as lower average balances in interest bearing accounts and shorter durations of short term investment vehicles; partially offset by
• $3.7 million increase in Capitalized interest based on the timing and progress of our development and redevelopment projects.
In 2025, Provision for impairment of real estate of $4.6 million was recognized related to sales of five operating properties. In 2024 Provision for impairment of real estate of $14.3 million was recognized related to a sale of an operating property and the change in expected hold period of another operating property, which was subsequently sold in 2025.
During 2025, we recognized Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax of $24.5 million primarily from sales of two operating properties and two outparcels. During 2024, we recognized Gain on sale of real estate, net of tax of $34.2 million primarily from sales of five operating properties and recognition of two sales-type leases.
There were no significant changes in Loss (gain) on early extinguishments of debt.
Net investment income decreased by $2.1 million primarily driven by market volatility during the current period, including a $2.0 million decrease in returns on investments held in the non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
Equity in income of investments in real estate partnerships increased by $83.2 million due to:
• $76.0 million increase related to a gain recognized from a partial distribution-in-kind transaction and partial sales of real estate; and
• $7.2 million increase driven from increased occupancy and positive rental spreads on new and renewal leases.
The following represents the remaining components that comprise Net income attributable to common shareholders and unit holders:
(in thousands)
2025
2024
Change
Net income
$
540,951
409,840
131,111
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests
(13,491
)
(9,452
)
(4,039
)
Net income attributable to the Company
527,460
400,388
127,072
Preferred stock dividends
(13,650
)
(13,650
)
—
Net income attributable to common shareholders
$
513,810
386,738
127,072
Net income attributable to exchangeable operating partnership units ("EOP")
7,069
2,338
4,731
Net income attributable to common unit holders
$
520,879
389,076
131,803
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased by $4.0 million, primarily due to a $4.7 million increase associated with the issuance of 2.8 million exchangeable operating partnership units to unrelated third-party sellers in connection with the acquisition of five properties in July 2025, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in net income from other consolidated real estate partnerships.
There was no change in Preferred stock dividends.
Net income attributable to exchangeable operating partnership units increased by $4.7 million, mainly due to the issuance of 2.8 million exchangeable operating partnership units to unrelated third-party sellers in consideration for the acquisition of five properties in July 2025.
47