FULLTEXT DEL 2 AV 3
10-K – 2025-11-24 – sym-20250927.htm
Risks Related to Cybersecurity, Software Deficiencies, Service Interruptions and Data Privacy We have experienced cybersecurity incidents in the past and may experience further cybersecurity incidents or security breaches of our IT or OT in the future, which may result in systems disruption, shutdown, unauthorized access to or disclosure of confidential or personal information. We rely heavily on information technology (“IT”) and operational technology (“OT”) in our systems and services for our customers, and in our enterprise infrastructure. Despite our implementation of security measures, our IT and OT may be subject to unauthorized access or harm by nation states, cyber-criminals, malicious insiders and other actors who may engage in fraud, theft of confidential or proprietary information, sabotage or other criminal activity. Our IT and OT could be compromised by malware (including ransomware), cyber-attacks or, as a result of, error or system failure. Hardware and software that we procure or rely upon from third parties may also contain defects or vulnerabilities in manufacture or design that could expose our systems to a risk of compromise. In addition, our software contains third-party open-source components, which may expose us to greater security risks than the use of non-open-source third-party commercial software. We have experienced cyber threats and incidents in the past, although none has been material or had a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. In the past, an unauthorized actor gained access to our IT, which resulted in certain information being accessed and exfiltrated, including human resources and employee data. Information that may have been subject to unauthorized access includes names, addresses and Social Security Numbers of employees. We may experience additional cybersecurity incidents and security breaches in the future. Additionally, certain functional areas of our workforce work remotely, and such a remote work environment may be outside of our corporate network security protection boundaries, which imposes additional risks to our business, including increased risk of industrial espionage, phishing, cybersecurity attacks and unauthorized dissemination of sensitive, proprietary or confidential information. We allow employees to use their personal devices to access certain of our resources. Personal devices are not centrally managed by us and could result in unauthorized access to sensitive, proprietary or confidential information if such a device is lost or compromised. Our business also uses IT resources on a dispersed basis for a wide variety of key functions, including hardware and software development, engineering, manufacturing, sales, accounting, human resources and security. Our vendors, partners, employees and customers have access to, and share, information across multiple locations via various digital technologies. In addition, we rely on partners and vendors, including cloud providers, for a wide range of outsourced activities as part of our IT infrastructure and our commercial offerings. Secure connectivity is important to these ongoing operations. Also, our partners and vendors frequently have access to our confidential information as well as confidential information about our customers, employees and others. We design our security architecture to reduce the risk that a compromise of our partners’ data or infrastructure, for example a cloud platform, could lead to a compromise of our internal systems or customer networks, but this risk cannot be eliminated and vulnerabilities at third parties could result in unknown risk exposure to our business. Any significant security incident could have an adverse impact on sales, interrupt or delay our ability to operate or service our customers, harm our reputation and cause us to incur legal liability and increased costs to address such events and related security concerns. Our ability to efficiently manage and expand our business depends significantly on the reliability, capacity and protection of our IT. Real or perceived failures or security breaches of our IT could disrupt our operations, lead to loss of proprietary information, damage our relationships with customers, result in regulatory investigations and penalties, lead to liability, negatively impact our reputation and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our systems, services and software are used by our customers in supply chain applications that may be subject to information theft, tampering, vulnerabilities or sabotage. Careless or malicious actors could cause a customer’s supply chain processes, including our systems, to be disrupted or could cause equipment to operate in an improper manner that could result in harm to people or property. While we continue to improve the security attributes of our systems, services and software, we can reduce risk but not eliminate it. To a significant extent, the security of our customers’ IT depends on how they are designed, installed, protected, configured, updated and monitored, and much of this is typically outside our control. In addition, the software supply chain introduces security vulnerabilities into many products, including products that may be used by our systems. The current cyber threat environment indicates increased risk for all companies, including those in supply chain automation. Any significant security incident could have an adverse impact on sales, interrupt or delay our ability to operate 32 Table of Contents or service our customers, harm our reputation and cause us to incur legal liability and increased costs to address such events and related security concerns. Cybersecurity incidents may also compromise third parties upon which we rely for our operations, and we are limited in our ability to prevent or mitigate those compromises or their effects. If such an event results in unauthorized access to, or loss of, any data subject to data privacy and security laws and regulations or contractual obligations, then we could be subject to substantial fines by U.S. federal and state authorities, foreign data privacy authorities and private claims by companies or individuals. A cyber-attack may cause additional costs, such as investigative and remediation costs, and the costs of providing individuals and/or data owners with notice of the breach, legal fees, and the costs of any additional fraud detection activities required by law, a court or a third party. Further, if a high-profile security breach occurs with respect to another provider of supply chain automation solutions, our customers may lose trust in the security of our systems or in the supply chain automation industry generally, which could adversely impact our ability to retain existing customers or attract new ones. Even in the absence of any security breach, customer concerns about security, privacy or data protection may deter them from using our systems, software and services, which could negatively impact our reputation and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. A breach of our IT that results in unauthorized access to personal information could require us to notify affected employees, customers and other persons (including governmental organizations) and lead to lawsuits and investigations alleging breaches of applicable laws or regulations. We may collect and process certain personal information of our customers or customers’ customers in connection with our business. Additionally, we collect and otherwise process other data relating to individuals, including business partners, prospects, employees, vendors and contractors. Although we take steps to protect the security of our customers’ personal information and other personal information within our control, we may face actual or perceived breaches of security, security incidents or other misuses of this information. Many jurisdictions have enacted laws requiring companies to notify individuals, regulatory authorities and others of security breaches involving certain types of data, and we may have contractual obligations to customers imposing similar requirements. We may be required to expend significant resources to comply with security breach and security incident notification requirements if a third party accesses or acquires such personal information without authorization, if we otherwise experience a security breach or incident or loss or damage of personal information, or if this is perceived to have occurred. Any actual or perceived breach of our network security, or those of our vendors or service providers, could result in claims, litigation and proceedings against us by governmental entities, customers, individuals or others, negative effects on our business and future prospects, including possible fines, penalties and damages, reduced demand for our systems, software and services and harm to our reputation and brand, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. We depend and rely upon technologies from third parties (including cloud-based technologies) to operate our business, and interruptions of, or performance or security problems with, these technologies or the termination of relationships with the providers of these technologies may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We rely on partners and vendors, including cloud providers, for a wide range of outsourced activities as part of our internal IT infrastructure and our commercial solution. If these services become unavailable due to extended outages or interruptions or because they are no longer available on commercially reasonable terms, our expenses could increase, our ability to manage finances could be interrupted and our processes for managing sales of our systems and supporting our customers could be impaired until equivalent services, if available, are identified, obtained and implemented. All of which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Real or perceived errors, failures, bugs or defects in our IT could adversely lead to liability and litigation, disrupt our operations and could negatively impact our reputation and otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our systems are complex and, like all complicated solutions that depend on software and hardware, may contain undetected defects or errors. We are continuing to evolve the features and functionality of our systems through updates and enhancements, and as we do so, we may introduce additional defects or errors that may not be detected until after deployment by our customers. If we acquire companies or integrate into our systems technologies developed by third parties, we may encounter difficulty in incorporating the newly-obtained technologies into our systems and maintaining the quality standards that are consistent with our reputation. 33 Table of Contents If our systems are not implemented or used correctly or as intended, inadequate performance and disruptions in service may result. Because our customers use our systems for important aspects of their business, any actual or perceived errors, defects, bugs, or other performance problems in our systems could damage our customers’ businesses. Any defects or errors in our systems generally, or the perception of such defects or errors, could result in a loss of customers and delayed or lost revenue and could damage our reputation and lead to liability or litigation. Errors in our software or hardware that supports our systems, generally, could cause system failures, loss of data or other adverse effects for our customers who may assert warranty and other claims for substantial damages against us. Although our customer agreements often contain provisions that seek to limit our exposure to such claims, it is possible that these provisions may be ineffective or unenforceable under the laws of some jurisdictions. While we seek to insure against these types of claims, our insurance policies may not adequately limit our exposure to such claims. These claims, even if unsuccessful, could be costly and time-consuming to defend and could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Our business requires the collection, use, handling, processing, transfer and storage of employee and customer data, and such activities may be regulated by third-party agreements, our own privacy policies and certain federal, state and foreign laws and regulations. Our handling of customer and employee data is subject to a variety of laws and regulations relating to privacy, data protection and cybersecurity, and we may become subject to additional obligations, including contractual obligations, relating to our maintenance and other processing of this data, and new or modified laws or regulations. Any actual or alleged failure by us to comply with our privacy policy or any federal, state or international privacy, data protection or security laws or regulations or other obligations could result in claims and litigation against us, regulatory investigations and other proceedings, legal liability, fines, damages and other costs. Any actual or alleged failure by any of our vendors or business partners to comply with contractual or legal obligations regarding the protection of information about our customers could result in similar consequences. Should we become subject to additional privacy or data protection laws, regulations, or other obligations relating to privacy, data protection or cybersecurity, we may need to undertake compliance efforts that could carry a large cost and could entail substantial time and other resources. We publish privacy policies and other documentation regarding our collection, use, disclosure, and other processing of personal information. Although we endeavor to adhere to these policies and documentation, we, and the third parties on which we rely, may at times fail to do so or may be perceived to have failed to do so. Such failures or perceived failures could subject us to regulatory enforcement action as well as costly legal claims by affected individuals or our customers. As enhanced, systemic administrative, physical, and technical safeguards and practices are evaluated, adopted, and implemented to safeguard personally identifiable information, those safeguards and practices may result in offsets to productivity gains we may make elsewhere. Similarly, as the rights of individuals expand globally with respect to their personal information, complying with established practices to affect those privacy rights also can impact our productivity. Numerous states and the federal government have enacted, or are considering enacting, increasingly complex and rigorous privacy, information security and data protection laws and regulations that build on an existing global privacy and data security regulatory framework. This global patchwork of laws could have a significant impact on our privacy, data protection and information security-related practices. Monitoring and complying with these laws and regulations may be expensive and disruptive to our business, and our real or perceived failure to comply with them could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We, our customers, and third parties whom we work with are subject to numerous evolving and increasingly stringent foreign and domestic laws and requirements relating to privacy, data security, and data loss prevention that are increasing the cost and complexity of operating our business. Compliance with state, federal and foreign privacy regulations, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act or the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, could increase our operating costs as part of our efforts to protect and safeguard our sensitive data and personal information. Failure to maintain information privacy and security could result in business interruption, legal liability and reputational harm. We strive to comply with applicable privacy, data security, and data protection laws and requirements, but we cannot fully determine the impact that current or future such laws and requirements may have on our business or operations. Such laws or requirements may be inconsistent from one jurisdiction to another, subject to differing interpretations, and courts or regulators may deem our efforts to comply as insufficient. If we, or the third parties we rely on to operate our business and deliver our services fail to comply, or are perceived as failing to comply, with our legal or contractual obligations relating to 34 Table of Contents privacy, data security, or data protection, or our policies and documentation relating to personal information, we could face: governmental enforcement action; litigation with our customers, individuals or others; fines and civil or criminal penalties for us or our executives; obligations to cease offering our systems or to substantially modify it in ways that make it less effective in certain jurisdictions; negative publicity and harm to our brand and reputation; and reduced overall demand for our systems. Such developments could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock Our common stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance; you may lose some or all of your investment. The trading price of our common stock may be volatile. The stock market and the market for our common stock recently have experienced extreme volatility. This volatility often has been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of particular companies. You may not be able to resell your shares at an attractive price due to a number of factors such as those listed in “Risks Related to Symbotic—Risks Related to Our Business, Operations and Industry” and the following: • our operating and financial performance and prospects; • our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in our industry compared to market expectations; • conditions that impact demand for our systems; • future announcements concerning our business, our customers’ businesses or our competitors’ businesses; • the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC; • the size of our public float; • coverage by or changes in financial estimates by securities analysts or failure to meet their expectations; • market and industry perception of our success, or lack thereof, in pursuing our growth strategy; • strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings; • changes in laws or regulations which adversely affect our industry or us; • changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles; • changes in senior management or key personnel; • issuances, exchanges or sales, or expected issuances, exchanges or sales of our capital stock; • changes in our dividend policy; • adverse resolution of new or pending litigation against us; and • changes in general market, economic and political conditions in the United States and global economies or financial markets, including those resulting from natural disasters, epidemics, terrorist attacks, acts of war and responses to such events. These broad market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In addition, price volatility may be greater because our public float and the trading volume of our common stock is low. As a result, you may suffer a loss on your investment. In the past, following periods of market volatility, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation. These class action lawsuits and any other possible securities litigation, whether meritorious or not, could have a substantial cost and divert resources and the attention of executive management from our business regardless of the outcome of such litigation. For additional information on these matters, see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.” We are party to pending litigation, and we may be subject to future litigation in the operation of our business. An adverse outcome in one or more proceedings could adversely affect our business. We are a party to litigation, and we may in the future face the risk of claims, lawsuits, and other proceedings involving competition and antitrust, intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, accessibility, securities, tax, labor and employment, commercial disputes, services and other matters. For additional information on these matters, see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.” Litigation to defend us against claims by third parties, or to enforce any rights that we may have against third parties, may be necessary, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources. Insurance might not cover such 35 Table of Contents claims, might not provide sufficient payments to cover all the costs to resolve one or more such claims and might not continue to be available on terms acceptable to us. Any litigation to which we are a party may result in an onerous or unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed upon appeal, or in payments of substantial monetary damages or fines, the posting of bonds requiring significant collateral, letters of credit or similar instruments, or we may decide to settle lawsuits on similarly unfavorable terms. These proceedings could result in reputational harm and criminal sanctions. Litigation and other claims and regulatory proceedings against us could also result in unexpected disciplinary actions, expenses and liabilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We have been, and may be in the future, the subject of governmental and regulatory investigations and inquiries, legal proceedings and enforcement actions with respect to the operation of our businesses. Any such investigation, inquiry, proceeding or action could adversely affect our business. We have in the past, and may receive in the future, formal and informal inquiries from government authorities and regulators regarding compliance with laws and other matters, particularly as we grow and expand our business and operations. Resolution of these matters against us may result in, among other things, the payment of fines, judgments, penalties, non-monetary sanctions, or settlements, which may be significant, as well as the imposition of administrative remedies, changes and additional costs to our business operations to avoid risks associated with such litigation or investigations, reputational damage and decreased demand for our products, and the expenditure of significant time and resources that would otherwise be available for operating our business. These results may have an impact on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on, among other things, our business prospects, results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements and availability, certain restrictions related to our indebtedness, if any, industry trends and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Any such decision will also be subject to compliance with contractual restrictions and covenants in the agreements governing future indebtedness. In addition, we may incur future indebtedness, the terms of which may further restrict or prevent us from paying dividends on our common stock. As a result, you may have to sell some or all of your common stock after price appreciation in order to generate cash flow from your investment, which you may not be able to do. Our inability or decision not to pay dividends, particularly when others in our industry have elected to do so, could also adversely affect the market price of our common stock. If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about us, or if they issue unfavorable commentary about us or our industry or downgrade our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline. The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that third-party securities analysts publish about us and the industries in which we operate. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets and demand for our common stock could decrease, which might cause our trading price and trading volume of our common stock to decline. If any of our analysts downgrades our common stock, or provides more favorable recommendations about our competitors, the price of our common stock would likely decline. Moreover, if our reporting results do not meet the expectations of our analysts, the market price of our common stock could decline. Our issuance of additional shares of common stock or convertible securities could make it difficult for another company to acquire us, may dilute your ownership of us and could adversely affect our stock price. We have filed a registration statement with the SEC on Form S-8 providing for the registration of shares of our common stock issued or reserved for issuance under the Symbotic Inc. 2022 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Incentive Compensation Plan”) and the 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). Subject to the satisfaction of vesting conditions, shares registered under the registration statement on Form S-8 will be available for resale immediately in the public market without restriction. From time to time in the future, we may also issue additional shares of our common stock 36 Table of Contents or securities convertible into common stock pursuant to a variety of transactions, including acquisitions. The issuance by us of additional shares of our common stock or securities convertible into our common stock would dilute your ownership of us and the sale of a significant amount of such shares in the public market could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. In the future, we expect to obtain financing or further increase our capital resources by issuing additional shares of our capital stock or offering debt or other equity securities, including senior or subordinated notes, debt securities convertible into equity, or shares of preferred stock. Issuing additional shares of our capital stock, other equity securities, or securities convertible into equity may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders, reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Debt securities convertible into equity could be subject to adjustments in the conversion ratio pursuant to which certain events may increase the number of equity securities issuable upon conversion. Preferred stock, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to the holders of our common stock. Our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, which may adversely affect the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. As a result, holders of our common stock bear the risk that our future offerings may reduce the market price of our common stock and dilute their percentage ownership. Future sales, or the perception of future sales, of our common stock by us or our stockholders in the public market could cause the market price for our common stock to decline. The sale of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could harm the prevailing market price of shares of our common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate. As of November 21, 2025, there were (i) 113,614,046 shares of Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding, (ii) 74,344,708 shares of Class V-1 Common Stock issued and outstanding, and (iii) 403,559,196 shares of Class V-3 Common Stock issued and outstanding. These numbers do not take into account unvested shares of our Class A Common Stock and paired shares of Class A Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of securities exercisable for units of Symbotic Holdings. Shares held by certain of our stockholders will be eligible for resale, subject to, in the case of certain stockholders, volume, manner of sale and other limitations under Rule 144, if then available. In addition, pursuant to the Amended & Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2022, among the Company, SVF Sponsor III (DE) LLC and other parties thereto, certain stockholders have the right, subject to certain conditions, to require us to register the sale of their shares of our common stock under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”). By exercising their registration rights and selling a large number of shares, these stockholders could cause the prevailing market price of our Class A Common Stock to decline. As of November 21, 2025, the shares covered by those registration rights represent approximately 83% of our outstanding common stock. As restrictions on resale end or if these stockholders exercise their registration rights, the market price of shares of our common stock could drop significantly if the holders of these shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional funds through future offerings of our shares of common stock or other securities. Shares of our common stock reserved for future issuance under our Incentive Compensation Plan and our ESPP are eligible for sale in the public market, subject to provisions relating to various vesting agreements, lock-up agreements and, in some cases, limitations on volume and manner of sale applicable to affiliates under Rule 144, as applicable. We have reserved for issuance under our Incentive Compensation Plan a total of 68,300,928 shares of Class A Common Stock and 50,266,507 shares of Class A Common Stock remain available for issuance under the Incentive Compensation Plan as of September 27, 2025 (the “Share Reserve”). The Share Reserve is subject to an annual increase on the first trading day of each calendar year, which began on January 1, 2023 and ends on and including January 1, 2032, by a number of shares equal to the lesser of (i) 5% of the aggregate number of shares of our Class A Common Stock outstanding on the last day of the prior calendar year and (ii) such smaller number of shares (which may be zero) as is determined by the compensation committee of our board of directors prior to such calendar year. 37 Table of Contents Anti-takeover provisions in our Charter and Bylaws and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult, limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management and limit the market price of our common stock. Our Charter, Bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could make it more difficult, delay, or prevent an acquisition deemed undesirable by our board of directors. Among other things, our Charter and/or Bylaws include the following provisions: • prohibition on stockholder action by written consent, which means that our stockholders will only be able to act at a meeting of stockholders and will not be able to act by written consent; • forum selection, which means certain litigation against us can only be brought in Delaware; • authorization of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and shares issued without further action by our stockholders; and • advance notice procedures, which apply to stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders. These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in our management. We are not governed by Section 203 of Delaware corporate law. In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination, such as a merger, with an “interested stockholder” (which includes a person or group owning 15% or more of the corporation’s voting stock) for a period of three years following the date the person became an interested stockholder, unless (with certain exceptions) the business combination or the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder is approved in a prescribed manner. Accordingly, we will not be subject to any anti-takeover effects of Section 203. Nevertheless, our Charter contains provisions that will have a similar effect to Section 203. Any provision of our Charter and Bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock. Our Charter provides that the courts located in the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees. Our Charter provides that, unless we consent in writing to an alternative forum, (a) a state court within Delaware (or, if no court within Delaware has jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware) will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for: (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (ii) any action asserting a breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, employees or stockholders to us or to our stockholders or (iii) any action arising pursuant to any provision of Delaware corporate law, our Charter or Bylaws; and (b) the federal district court for the District of Delaware (or if such court does not have jurisdiction, any other federal district court) will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for any action arising under the Securities Act. These forum selection provisions will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability, obligation or duty created by the Exchange Act. The choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provision contained in our Charter to be inapplicable or unenforceable, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act. As noted above, our Charter will provide that the federal district courts will have jurisdiction over any action arising under the Securities Act. Accordingly, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provision. Our stockholders will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws. 38 Table of Contents Risks Related to Being a Public Company We have incurred and will continue to incur increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management continues to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives. We became a public company in 2022. Consequently, we have incurred, and we will continue to incur, significant legal, compliance, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as well as rules adopted, and to be adopted, by the SEC and NASDAQ. Our management and other personnel devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, we expect these rules and regulations to substantially increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We cannot predict or estimate the amount or timing of additional costs we may incur to respond to these requirements. Some members of our management have limited experience in operating a public company. Some members of our management have limited experience in the management of a public company. As a public company, we must establish and maintain appropriate corporate infrastructure. Their experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies could be a disadvantage. It is likely that an increasing amount of their time may be devoted to these activities, which will result in less time being devoted to our management and growth. The development and implementation of the standards and controls necessary for us to achieve the level of accounting standards required of a public company may require additional staffing and costs greater than expected. We may need to expand our employee base and hire additional employees to support our operations as a public company, which will increase our operating costs. Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure The multi class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting control with our founder, certain family members of our founder and certain affiliated entities and trusts of our founder and his family members; this will limit or preclude your ability to influence our corporate matters. Our Class V-3 common stock has three votes per share and our Class A Common Stock and Class V-1 common stock have one vote per share. Our Class V-3 common stock converts into Class V-1 common stock in certain situations, including automatically on June 7, 2029. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Richard B. Cohen, together with certain family members and certain affiliated entities and trusts of Mr. Cohen and his family members, in the aggregate, hold Class V-3 common stock and 69.3% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock and are able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval as of September 27, 2025. This concentrated control will limit or preclude your ability to influence our corporate matters for the foreseeable future. Transfers by holders of our Class V-3 common stock will generally result in those shares converting to Class V-1 common stock, subject to limited exceptions, such as certain transfers effected for estate planning or charitable purposes. The conversion of Class V-3 common stock to Class V-1 common stock will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class V-3 common stock who retain their shares in the long term. If, for example, Mr. Cohen retains, including through his affiliated entities and trusts, a significant portion of his holdings of Class V-3 common stock for an extended period of time, he could, in the future, continue to control a significant portion of the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock. Our multi-class capital structure may render our shares ineligible for inclusion in certain stock market indices, which could adversely affect the share price and liquidity of our common stock. We cannot predict whether our multi-class structure will result in a lower or more volatile market price of our Class A Common Stock, in adverse publicity, or other adverse consequences. For example, certain index providers have restrictions on including companies with multiple-class share structures in certain of their indexes. In addition, several stockholder advisory firms have announced their opposition to the use of multiple-class structures. As a result, the multi-class structure of our common stock may cause stockholder advisory firms to publish negative commentary about our corporate governance practices, recommend that stockholders vote against certain company annual stockholder meeting proposals or otherwise seek 39 Table of Contents to cause us to change our capital structure. Any such exclusion from indices or any actions or publications by stockholder advisory firms critical of our corporate governance practices or capital structure could adversely affect the value and trading market of our Class A Common Stock. We share certain key executives with C&S Wholesale Grocers, an important customer, which means those executives will not devote their full time and attention to our affairs, and the overlap may give rise to conflicts. Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Richard B. Cohen, also serves as the Executive Chairman of C&S Wholesale Grocers and he and trusts for the benefit of his family are the substantial majority stockholders of C&S Wholesale Grocers. Our Chief Strategy Officer, William Boyd, also serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of C&S Wholesale Grocers and our Chief Human Resource Officer, Miriam Ort, also serves as Chief Human Resources Officer of C&S Wholesale Grocers. As a result, not all of our executive officers devote their full time and attention to our affairs and are compensated separately by C&S Wholesale Grocers and its subsidiaries. The overlapping executives may have actual or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to matters involving or affecting each company. For example, the potential for a conflict of interest exists when we, on the one hand, and C&S Wholesale Grocers, on the other hand, look at certain corporate opportunities that may be suitable for either company. Also, conflicts may arise if there are issues or disputes under the commercial arrangements that exist between us and C&S Wholesale Grocers. These overlapping executives’ ownership interests in us and C&S Wholesale Grocers could create actual, apparent or potential conflicts of interest if they are faced with decisions that have different implications for us and C&S Wholesale Grocers. Our overlapping executive officers and directors with C&S Wholesale Grocers may result in the diversion of corporate opportunities to C&S Wholesale Grocers and other conflicts, and provisions in our Charter may provide us no remedy in those circumstances. Certain of our executive officers and directors may also be serving as directors, officers, employees, consultants or agents of C&S Wholesale Grocers and its subsidiaries and we may engage in material business transactions with such entities. Our Charter renounces our rights to certain business opportunities. It also provides that no director or officer who is also serving as a director, officer, employee, consultant or agent of C&S Wholesale Grocers will be liable to us or our stockholders for breach of any fiduciary duty that would otherwise occur by reason of the fact that any such individual directs a corporate opportunity to C&S Wholesale Grocers or any of its subsidiaries instead of us, or does not refer or communicate information regarding such corporate opportunities to us. Our only principal asset is our interest in New Symbotic Holdings, and accordingly, we will depend on distributions from New Symbotic Holdings to pay taxes, make payments under the tax receivable agreement (“TRA”) and cover our corporate and other overhead expenses. We are a holding company and have no material assets other than our ownership interest in New Symbotic Holdings. We have no independent means of generating revenue or cash flow. To the extent the funds of New Symbotic Holdings are legally available for distribution, and subject to any restrictions contained in any credit agreement to which New Symbotic Holdings or its subsidiaries are bound, New Symbotic Holdings is required under the New Symbotic Holdings Limited Liability Company Agreement (“New Symbotic Holdings LLC Agreement”) to (i) make generally pro rata distributions to its equityholders, including us, in an amount generally intended to allow its equityholders to satisfy their respective income tax liabilities with respect to their allocable share of the income of New Symbotic Holdings, based on certain assumptions and conventions, and (ii) reimburse us for our corporate and other overhead expenses. In the future, we may be limited, however, in our ability to cause New Symbotic Holdings and its subsidiaries to make these and other distributions to us due to restrictions contained in any credit agreement to which New Symbotic Holdings or any of its subsidiaries are bound. To the extent that we need funds and New Symbotic Holdings or its subsidiaries are restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation or under the terms of their financing arrangements or are otherwise unable to provide such funds, our liquidity and financial condition could be adversely affected. Moreover, because we have no independent means of generating revenue, our ability to make tax payments and payments under the TRA is dependent on the ability of New Symbotic Holdings to make distributions to us in an amount sufficient to cover our tax obligations and obligations under the TRA. This ability, in turn, may depend on the ability of New Symbotic Holdings’ subsidiaries to make distributions to it. The ability of New Symbotic Holdings, its subsidiaries and other entities in which it directly or indirectly holds an equity interest to make such distributions will be subject to, among other things, (i) the applicable provisions of Delaware law (or other applicable jurisdictions) that may limit the amount of funds 40 Table of Contents available for distribution and (ii) restrictions contained in any credit agreement to which New Symbotic Holdings, its subsidiaries and other entities in which it directly or indirectly holds an equity interest are bound. To the extent that we are unable to make payments under the TRA for any reason, such payments will accrue interest until paid. Pursuant to the TRA, we are required to make payments to equity holders of New Symbotic Holdings for certain tax benefits we may claim, and those payments may be substantial. Our purchase of common units of New Symbotic Holdings (“New Symbotic Holdings Common Units”) in connection with the Unit Purchase Agreement dated December 12, 2021 and exchange of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units for shares of our Class A Common Stock or cash pursuant to the New Symbotic Holdings LLC Agreement (collectively, “Exchanges”) are expected to produce additional favorable tax attributes for us. When we acquire New Symbotic Holdings Common Units from existing unitholders, both the existing basis and anticipated basis adjustments are likely to increase (for tax purposes) depreciation and amortization deductions allocable to us from New Symbotic Holdings and therefore reduce the amount of income tax that we would otherwise be required to pay in the future. This increase in tax basis may also decrease gain (or increase loss) on future dispositions of certain assets to the extent the increased tax basis is allocated to those assets. We entered into the TRA, which generally provides for the payment by us to certain legacy equity holders of New Symbotic Holdings (“TRA Holders”) of their proportionate share of 85% of the tax savings, if any, in U.S. federal and state income tax that we realize (or are deemed to realize in certain circumstances) as a result of (i) the existing tax basis in certain assets of New Symbotic Holdings that is allocable to the relevant New Symbotic Holdings Common Units, (ii) any step-up in tax basis in New Symbotic Holdings’ assets resulting from the relevant Exchanges and certain distributions (if any) by New Symbotic Holdings and payments under the TRA, and (iii) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the TRA. The term of the TRA will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired unless we exercise our right to terminate the TRA for an amount representing the present value of anticipated future tax benefits under the TRA or certain other acceleration events occur. These payments are our obligation and not that of New Symbotic Holdings. We expect that the payments we will be required to make under the TRA will be substantial. Assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize all tax benefits that are subject to the TRA, we expect that the reduction in tax payments for us associated with our purchase of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units since the business combination between SVF Investment Corp. 3 and Symbotic (the “Business Combination”) that closed on June 7, 2022 would aggregate to approximately $532.9 million over a 41-year period. Under such scenario we would be required to pay the TRA Holders 85% of such amount, or approximately $453 million, over a 41-year period from the Business Combination. Further, assuming no material changes in the relevant tax law and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize all tax benefits that are subject to the TRA, we estimate that the reduction in tax payments for us associated with our purchase of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units would aggregate to approximately $7,509.9 million over 41 years based on a closing share price of $52.14 per share of Class A common stock and assuming all future Exchanges of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units had occurred on September 27, 2025. Under such scenario, we would be required to pay the TRA Holders 85% of such amount, or $6,452.2 million, over a 41-year period. These amounts are estimates and have been prepared for informational purposes only. The actual amount of reduction in tax payments and related liabilities that we will recognize will differ based on, among other things, the timing of the Exchanges, the price of our shares of Class A Common Stock at the time of the Exchanges, and the tax rates then in effect. The actual payment amounts may materially differ from these hypothetical amounts, as potential future reductions in tax payments for us and TRA payments by us are calculated using the market value of our Class A Common Stock at the time of an Exchange and the prevailing tax rates applicable to us over the life of the TRA and is dependent on us generating sufficient future taxable income to realize the benefit. The actual increase in our allocable share of New Symbotic Holdings’ tax basis in its assets, as well as the amount and timing of any payments under the TRA, vary depending upon a number of factors, including the timing of Exchanges, the market price of our Class A Common Stock at the time of the Exchanges, the extent to which such Exchanges are taxable, the amount and timing of the recognition of our income, the tax rate then applicable, and the portion of our payments under the TRA constituting imputed interest. Payments under the TRA are expected to give rise to certain additional tax benefits attributable to either further increases in basis or in the form of deductions for imputed interest, depending on the circumstances. Any such benefits are covered by the TRA and will increase the amounts due thereunder. In addition, the TRA 41 Table of Contents provides for interest, at a rate equal to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate plus 100 basis points, accrued from the due date (without extensions) of the corresponding tax return to the date of payment specified by the TRA. While many of the factors that will determine the amount of payments that we will make under the TRA are outside of our control, we expect that the payments we will make under the TRA will be substantial and could materially and adversely affect our financial condition. Any payments made by us under the TRA will generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to us. To the extent that we are unable to make timely payments under the TRA for any reason, the unpaid amounts will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid; however, nonpayment for a specified period may constitute a material breach of a material obligation under the TRA and therefore accelerate payments due under the TRA, as further described below. Furthermore, our future obligation to make payments under the TRA could make us a less attractive target for an acquisition, particularly in the case of an acquirer that cannot use some or all of the tax benefits that may be deemed realized under the TRA. In certain cases, payments under the TRA may exceed the actual tax benefits we realize or be accelerated. Payments under the TRA will be based on the tax reporting positions that we determine. The Internal Revenue Service or another taxing authority may challenge all or any part of the tax basis increases, as well as other tax positions that we take, and a court may sustain such a challenge. If any tax benefits that we initially claimed are disallowed, the TRA Holders will not be required to reimburse us for any excess payments that may previously have been made under the TRA, for example, due to adjustments resulting from examinations by taxing authorities. Rather, excess payments made to such holders will be netted against any future cash payments that we are otherwise required to make after the determination of such excess. However, a challenge to any tax benefits that we initially claim may not arise for a number of years after the initial time of such payment or, even if challenged early, such excess cash payment may be greater than the amount of future cash payments that we might otherwise be required to make under the terms of the TRA and, as a result, there might not be future cash payments against which to net. As a result, in certain circumstances we could make payments under the TRA in excess of our actual income or franchise tax savings, which could materially impair our financial condition. Moreover, the TRA provides that, if we (i) exercise our early termination rights under the TRA, (ii) experience certain changes of control (as described in the TRA) or (iii) breach any of our material obligations under the TRA, our obligations under the TRA may accelerate and we could be required to make a lump-sum cash payment to each TRA Holder equal to the present value of all future payments that would have otherwise been made under the TRA, which lump sum payment would be based on certain assumptions, including those relating to our future taxable income. The lump-sum payment could be substantial and could exceed the actual tax benefits that we realize subsequent to such payment because we would calculate such payment assuming, among other things, that we would have certain tax benefits available to us and that we would be able to use them in future years. There may be a material negative effect on our liquidity if the payments under the TRA exceed the actual tax savings that we realize. Furthermore, our obligations to make payments under the TRA could also have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combinations or other changes of control. If New Symbotic Holdings were to become a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we and New Symbotic Holdings might be subject to potentially significant tax inefficiencies, and we would not be able to recover payments previously made by us under the TRA even if the corresponding tax benefits were subsequently determined to have been unavailable due to such status. A number of aspects of our structure depend on the classification of New Symbotic Holdings as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and we intend to operate such that New Symbotic Holdings does not become a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. A “publicly traded partnership” is a partnership the interests of which are traded on an established securities market or are readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof. Under certain circumstances, Exchanges or other transfers of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units could cause New Symbotic Holdings to be treated as a publicly traded partnership. Applicable U.S. Treasury regulations provide for certain safe harbors from treatment as a publicly traded partnership, and we intend to operate such that Exchanges or other transfers of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units qualify for one or more such safe harbors. For example, we intend to limit the number of New Symbotic Holdings unitholders, and the New Symbotic Holdings LLC Agreement provides for limitations on the ability of New Symbotic Holdings equityholders to transfer their New Symbotic Holdings Common Units and provides us with the right to cause the imposition of limitations and restrictions (in addition to those already in place) on the ability of New Symbotic Holdings equityholders to Exchange their New Symbotic Holdings 42 Table of Contents Common Units to the extent we believe it is necessary to ensure that New Symbotic Holdings will continue to be treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If New Symbotic Holdings were to become a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, significant tax inefficiencies might result for us and New Symbotic Holdings, including as a result of our inability to file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return with New Symbotic Holdings. In addition, we may not be able to realize tax benefits covered under the TRA, and we would not be able to recover any payments previously made by us under the TRA, even if the corresponding tax benefits (including any claimed increase in the tax basis of New Symbotic Holdings’ assets) were subsequently determined to have been unavailable. Other Risks We implemented a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system, and challenges with the implementation of the system may impact our business and operations. In fiscal year 2024, we implemented a multi-year implementation of a complex new ERP system. The ERP system implementation required the integration of the ERP system with multiple new and existing information systems and business processes. It has been designed to accurately maintain our books and records and provide information to our management teams important to the operation of our business. Our ERP system implementation will continue to require ongoing maintenance and monitoring and in the future we may elect to implement additional modules of the ERP system. Conversion from our old system to the ERP system may cause inefficiencies until the ERP system is stabilized and mature. The implementation of our ERP system has mandated new procedures and many new controls over financial reporting. These procedures and controls are not yet mature in their operation. If we are unable to adequately maintain procedures and controls relating to our ERP system, our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired and impact our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be significantly hindered by the occurrence of a natural disaster, terrorist attack or other catastrophic event. We also face risks related to health pandemics or epidemics, such COVID-19, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our business operations and our systems may be susceptible to outages due to fire, floods, unusual weather conditions, power loss, telecommunications failures, health pandemics or epidemics, terrorist attacks and other events beyond our control. Natural disasters including tornados, hurricanes, floods and earthquakes may damage the facilities of our customers, which could lead to reduced revenue for our customers and thus reduced sales for us. For example, during our fiscal year 2024, Hurricane Helene affected our ability to timely complete a customer installation at one of our sites. In addition, a substantial portion of our operations rely on support from our headquarters in Wilmington, Massachusetts. To the extent that fire, floods, unusual weather conditions, power loss, telecommunications failures, health pandemics or epidemics, terrorist attacks and other events beyond our control materially impact our ability to operate those offices, it may have a material impact on our business operations as a whole. To the extent that an event disrupts our business or the business of our current or prospective customers, or adversely impacts our reputation, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We are subject to U.S. and foreign anti-corruption and anti-money laundering laws and regulations and could face criminal liability and other serious consequences for violations, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. § 201, the U.S. Travel Act and the USA PATRIOT Act, and are or will be subject to other anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in countries in which we conduct or will conduct activities such as Mexico. Anti-corruption laws are interpreted broadly and prohibit companies and their employees, agents, contractors and other collaborators from authorizing, promising, offering or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or anything else of value to recipients in the public or private sector. We can be held liable for the corrupt or other illegal activities of our employees, agents, contractors and other collaborators, even if we do not explicitly authorize or have actual knowledge of such activities. Any violations of these laws and regulations may result in substantial civil and criminal fines and penalties, imprisonment, the loss of export or import privileges, debarment, tax reassessments, breach of contract and fraud litigation, reputational harm and other consequences. 43 Table of Contents Changes to applicable tax laws and regulations, exposure to additional income tax liabilities or unfavorable outcomes in tax audits could harm our future profitability or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are a U.S. corporation with international operations and thus subject to U.S. corporate income tax on our worldwide operations and subject to foreign taxes in each relevant jurisdiction. Moreover, the majority of our operations and customers are located in the United States, and, as a result, we are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local taxes. New U.S. laws and policy relating to taxes may have an adverse effect on our business and future profitability. Further, new income, sales, use or other tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances, in the United States or in other foreign jurisdictions, could be enacted at any time, which could adversely affect our business, financial, condition or results of operations. In addition, existing tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to us and may have an adverse effect on our business, cash flows and future profitability. Our organizational structure is commonly referred to as an “Up-C” structure, which is often used by partnerships and limited liability companies undertaking an initial public offering to provide certain tax benefits and associated cash flow advantages to both the issuer corporation and the existing owners of the partnership or limited liability company in the initial public offering. The Up-C structure allows the Warehouse Technologies LLC unitholders to retain their equity ownership in New Symbotic Holdings, an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in the form of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units. This allows the holders of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units to retain the tax benefits of owning interests in a pass-through entity while also being able to access public markets. All other investors hold their equity ownership in Symbotic, a Delaware corporation that is a domestic corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, in the form of shares of Class A Common Stock. From time to time, the U.S. Congress has considered legislation to change the tax treatment of partnerships and there can be no assurance that any such legislation will not be enacted or if enacted will not be adverse to us. Because the holders of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units hold their economic interests directly in New Symbotic Holdings, rather than through us, the interests of such holders may conflict with those of the holders of shares of our Class A Common Stock. For example, the holders of New Symbotic Holdings Common Units may have a different tax position from the holders of our Class A Common Stock, which could influence decisions regarding whether and when New Symbotic Holdings should dispose of assets or incur new indebtedness, undergo certain changes of control within the meaning of the TRA, or terminate the TRA. In addition, the structuring of future transactions may take into consideration these tax or other considerations even where no similar benefit would accrue to the holders of shares of our Class A Common Stock. We also may be subject to audits of our income, sales and other transaction taxes by U.S. federal, state, local and foreign taxing authorities. Outcomes from these audits could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments None. Item 1C. Cybersecurity We believe data privacy and cybersecurity are critical to supporting our vision and enabling our strategy. Our approach to data privacy and cybersecurity is supported by our commitment to preserving the trust our employees and customers place in us and focuses on driving continuous improvement as the threat landscape evolves. Our board of directors (“Board”), in coordination with each of our committees of our Board, is responsible for oversight of our enterprise risk management activities. The Board oversees risks from cybersecurity threats through periodic reports from the audit committee of the Board (“Audit Committee”), which monitors cybersecurity incidents and management’s response to such incidents. Our Audit Committee directly oversees our processes for identifying and mitigating risks, including cybersecurity risks, to help align our risk exposure with our strategic objectives. Our Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) , who has over 25 years of experience in information technology and security and held pivotal leadership roles in Security at several Fortune 100 companies, has primary responsibility for overseeing our management of cybersecurity risks. Reporting to the Chief Technology Officer (“CTO”), our CIO meets regularly with the CTO, and works cross-functionally with other department leaders, including legal, business, policy, and technical functions, as appropriate, to exchange information related to cybersecurity. Our CIO provides quarterly updates to our Audit Committee on our cybersecurity status, risks, and strategies. These quarterly updates address a range of cybersecurity-related topics, such 44 Table of Contents as recent developments related to the threat landscape, security controls, vulnerability assessments, third-party reviews, technological trends, and information security considerations arising with respect to our peers and third parties. Our cybersecurity programs and procedures are designed to identify and address threats that are subject to ongoing compliance assessments, certifications, and testing. We conduct assessments of threat models to determine which risks are most likely to impact us. Our security and controls team gathers threat and risk data and updates through various sources, such as systems reviews, security research activities, and internal and external security scans and alerts, as appropriate. As applicable, in certain circumstances, we also collaborate with industry partners in the security community, our peers and law enforcement agencies, to support our cybersecurity threat intelligence capabilities. This information is collected, categorized, and assessed to identify, prioritize, and manage significant cybersecurity risks. As a result, our process is continually evaluated and evolves as the threat landscape changes. We have also incorporated security practices into employee trainings. We have a process for employees to formally acknowledge their review and understanding of security obligations. Additionally, our security and controls team conducts periodic security and data protection training aimed to emphasize the importance of security and data protection. We have also implemented a review process to assess the security profile and data protection practices of certain third-party suppliers and service providers that have exposure to our systems, including, as appropriate, review of vendor security policies and procedures. We do not, however, review security profile and data protection practices of all third-party vendors. In the event of a cybersecurity incident, our response and mitigation efforts are guided by the Incident Response Plan (“IRP”), which provides guidance on how to respond to, and recover from, a material cyber incident requiring an organized response. We conduct tabletop exercises testing the principles and procedures set forth in our IRP based on lessons learned. In addition, we have a cybersecurity disclosure committee (“Cybersecurity Disclosure Committee”) which receives updates on an as needed basis from our security organization regarding cybersecurity incidents. The Cybersecurity Disclosure Committee includes our CIO and senior representatives from finance, controllership, internal audit, investor relations, and legal teams. In the event of a cybersecurity incident, the Cybersecurity Disclosure Committee meets to assess the incident for materiality and required disclosure. While we have experienced a cybersecurity incident in the past, as of the date hereof, none have materially affected us or our business strategy, financial condition, results of operations, and/or cash flows. We continue to invest in cybersecurity and resiliency of our networks to enhance our internal controls and processes, which are designed to help protect our systems and infrastructure, and the information which they contain. For more information about cybersecurity risks relating to our business, refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Item 2. Properties As of September 27, 2025, our material leased facilities are summarized below. We believe that our leased space is adequate for our current needs and, should we need additional space, we believe we will be able to obtain additional space on commercially reasonable terms. Location ~Size (sq. ft.) Lease Expiration Purpose Wilmington, MA (Main) 66,000 December 2030 Headquarters, R&D & Admin Wilmington, MA (Integrated Test Center) 188,000 December 2030 R&D & Testing Andover, MA 100,000 July 2027 Admin & Warehouse Milpitas, CA 21,000 June 2026 R&D & Admin Item 3. Legal Proceedings We are subject from time to time to various claims, lawsuits and other legal and administrative proceedings (including those described below). Some of these claims, lawsuits and other proceedings may involve highly complex issues that are subject to substantial uncertainties, and could result in damages, fines and penalties, non-monetary sanctions or other relief. We intend to recognize provisions for claims or pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable, and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Due to the inherent uncertain nature of litigation, the ultimate outcome or actual cost of settlement may materially vary from estimates. For additional information, see “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Common Stock - We are party to pending litigation, and we may be subject to future litigation in the operation of our business. An adverse outcome in one or more proceedings could adversely affect our business.” 45 Table of Contents Securities Class Actions On August 14, 2024, a putative class action captioned Fox v. Symbotic Inc. et al., Case No. 24-cv-12090 was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts by an alleged holder of the Company’s common stock. On March 10, 2025, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). On December 3, 2024, a putative class action captioned Decker v. Symbotic Inc. et al., Case No. 24-cv-12976 was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts by an alleged purchaser of the Company’s common stock. The complaint asserted claims for violations of federal securities laws against the Company and three of its officers on the grounds that the Company made false and/or misleading statements related to its revenue recognition and the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures. Based on these allegations, the plaintiff brought claims seeking unspecified damages, attorneys’ fees, expert fees, and other costs and relief on behalf of himself and a putative class of persons who purchased the Company’s stock between February 8, 2024 and November 26, 2024. On May 5, 2025, the court entered an order appointing a lead plaintiff pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and setting a schedule for the filing of an amended complaint and the Company’s response to the complaint. On July 11, 2025, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint captioned Traina v. Symbotic Inc. et al., Case No. 24-cv-12196. Like the Decker complaint, the amended complaint asserts claims for violations of federal securities laws against the Company and four of officers of the Company on the grounds that the Company made false and/or misleading statements or omissions related to its financial results, deployment times, revenue recognition, and internal controls. Based on these allegations, the plaintiffs bring claims seeking unspecified damages, attorneys’ fees, expert fees, and other costs and relief on behalf of themselves and a putative class of persons who purchased stock of the Company between November 20, 2023 and February 5, 2025. The Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on September 11, 2025. The plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss on November 11, 2025. The Company’s reply brief in support of its motion to dismiss is due on December 11, 2025. A hearing on the motion to dismiss is scheduled for December 16, 2025. We intend to vigorously defend these cases. If a court ultimately determines that we are liable in either or both of these cases, we may be subject to substantial damages. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these matters or determine the extent of any potential liabilities. We also cannot provide an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss. Any adverse outcome in these matters could expose us to substantial damages that may have a material adverse impact on our operations and cash flows. Despite the potential for significant damages, we do not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcome of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, although the outcome could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period. Shareholder Derivative Actions On October 2, 2024, two putative shareholder derivative actions captioned Austen v. Cohen et al., 24-cv-12522 and Kukreja v. Cohen et al., 24-cv-12523 were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts by the Company’s alleged shareholders. The actions assert claims on behalf of the Company against certain senior officers and members of its board of directors for, among others, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and violations of federal securities laws based primarily on allegations that the defendants caused or allowed the Company to disseminate misleading and inaccurate information to shareholders in connection with the Company’s expected earnings for the third quarter of fiscal year 2024. The actions also contend that the defendants wasted corporate assets by exposing the Company to the securities class action lawsuit filed on August 14, 2024. The actions seek compensatory damages, changes to corporate governance and internal procedures, restitution, costs and attorneys’ fees, and other unspecified relief. Motions to consolidate the two actions into a single matter, appoint lead plaintiffs’ counsel, and stay any obligation of the defendants to respond to the complaint based on the pendency of the related securities class action lawsuit remain pending. We intend to vigorously defend these cases. If a court ultimately determines that we are liable, we may be subject to substantial damages. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this matter or determine the extent of any potential liabilities. We also cannot provide an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss. Any adverse outcome in this matter could expose us to substantial damages that may have a material adverse impact on our operations and cash flows. Despite the potential for significant damages, we do not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcome of this proceeding will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, although the outcome could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Not applicable. 46 Table of Contents PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Market Information for Common Stock Our Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, is traded on NASDAQ under the symbol “SYM”. Our Class V-1 Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and Class V-3 Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, that are convertible into our Class A common stock are not traded on any established public trading market. Holders of our Common Stock As of November 21, 2025, there were approximately 15 holders of record of our Class A Common Stock, approximately 28 holders of our Class V-1 Common Stock and approximately 18 holders of record of our Class V-3 Common Stock. Certain shares of our Class A Common Stock are held in “street” name and, accordingly, the number of beneficial owners of such shares is not known or included in the foregoing number. The number of holders of record also does not include beneficial owners of shares that are be held in trust by other entities. Dividends We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities There were no purchases of equity securities by the issuer or affiliated purchasers, as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, during the quarter ended September 27, 2025. Performance Graph The following graph shows a 55-month comparison of cumulative total returns for our Class A common stock, the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 500 Index, and the S&P 500 Information Technology Index. 47 Table of Contents Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities None, other than as set forth in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 24, 2023. Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans The information required by Item 5 of Form 10-K regarding equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report. Item 6. [Reserved] Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of certain risks associated with our business. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. The use of words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. From time to time, we also may provide forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public. Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” to “Symbotic,” “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” are intended to mean the business and operations of Symbotic Inc. This section provides an analysis of our financial results for the year ended September 27, 2025 as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024. For the discussion and analysis covering the year ended September 28, 2024 compared to the year ended September 30, 2023, please refer to the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 28, 2024, as filed with the SEC on December 4, 2024. 48 Table of Contents Company Overview Our vision is to make the supply chain work better for everyone. We do this by developing, commercializing, and deploying innovative and comprehensive technology solutions that dramatically improve supply chain operations. We automate the processing of pallets, cases and items (known as eaches) in warehouses. Our robotic based automation systems, which include hardware and essential software, move, store and sort cases and eaches in warehouses. Our systems are operational in a number of the world’s largest retailers, including Walmart, wholesale distributors, including C&S Wholesale Grocers, and are being deployed in GreenBox Systems LLC (“GreenBox”), our warehouse-as-a-service joint venture. We have spent significant time working closely with our customers to develop, test and refine our technology. We have approximately $22.5 billion of backlog as of September 27, 2025, of which our agreements with Walmart and GreenBox comprise the vast majority. We have devoted significant funds and resources to date in developing and diversifying our systems and related applications. Our systems are designed to increase efficiency, speed and flexibility of the supply chain by using proprietary robotics and A.I.-powered software for the movement and storage of goods. Our intellectual property is protected by a portfolio of approximately 1,100 issued and/or pending patents. We believe that the global supply chain has reached a point of critical stress, driving an inflection in demand for intelligent and scalable automation. As consumer buying habits change, the labor market shifts, and cost of living wages increase, the demand on warehouse workers is becoming overly burdensome. Manual operations are becoming unsustainable and older automation systems are not capable of optimally satisfying modern operational needs. The dramatic growth in e-commerce has increased supply chain complexity by putting pressure on retailers to support multiple sales channels and orders of eaches in addition to cases and pallets. Meanwhile, consumer expectations have evolved to demand a larger variety of items to be delivered quickly and seamlessly. This has placed significant strain on the traditional supply chain and the people who support it. We help our customers thrive in this increasingly challenging environment. In January 2025, we acquired the Advanced Systems and Robotics (“ASR”) business from Walmart and signed a Master Automation Agreement that provides for the development, manufacture and installation of automated systems for online pickup and delivery at Walmart retail stores (“2025 Walmart MAA”). This acquisition added a new product category for us to address the opportunity for automated fulfillment of customer orders at the local and store level, which supports the growth of e-commerce. Under the 2025 Walmart MAA, as of September 27, 2025, we are operating several micro-fulfillment systems, which we will continue to support. We are in the process of developing an advanced micro-fulfillment system for future deployments. Key Components of Consolidated Statements of Operations Revenue We generate revenue through our design and installation of supply chain automation systems to automate customers’ depalletizing, storage, selection, and palletization warehousing processes (“System”). The Systems have both a hardware component and an essential software component that enables the Systems to be programmed to operate within specific customer environments. We enter into contracts with customers that can include various combinations of services to design and install the Systems. These services are generally distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. As a result, each customer contract may contain multiple performance obligations. We determine whether performance obligations are distinct based on whether the customer can benefit from the good or service on its own or together with other resources that are readily available and whether our commitment to provide the goods or services to the customer is separately identifiable from other promises in the contract. We have identified the following distinct performance obligations in our contracts with customers: Systems : We design, assemble, and install Systems and perform configuration of essential software. Systems include the delivery of hardware and an essential software component, sold as either a perpetual or term-based on-premise license, that automate our customers’ depalletizing, storage, selection, and palletization warehousing processes. The hardware and essential software are each not capable of being distinct because our customers cannot benefit from the hardware or software on their own. Accordingly, they are treated as a single performance obligation. Fees for Systems are typically either cost-plus fixed fee amounts, fixed, or in certain cases, subject to a capped cost amount that are due based on the achievement of a variety of milestones beginning at contract inception through final acceptance. The substantial majority of our software is sold as a perpetual on-premise license, however, we do sell an immaterial amount of term-based on-premise licenses. The key metrics which describe our Systems from commencement to completion are as follows: (1) “Start” is defined as when we sign a Statement of Work (“SOW”) with a customer; (2) “Deployment” is defined as the period of time following 49 Table of Contents the signed SOW until the acceptance of the System; and (3) “Operational” is defined as achieving acceptance of a System. The majority of Systems revenue occurs during Deployment, and once a System is Operational, software maintenance and support begins. Software Maintenance and Support : “Software Maintenance and Support” is defined as support services that provide our customers with technical support, updates, and upgrades to the software license. Fees for Software Maintenance and Support are typically payable in advance on a quarterly, or annual basis over the term of the Software Maintenance and Support contract, which term can range from one to 15 years, but for a substantial majority of our Software Maintenance and Support contracts is 15 years. Operation Services : “Operation Services” is defined as assistance services, which can range from training services to managed services to on-site services we provide our customers operating the System and ensuring user experience is optimized for efficiency and effectiveness. Fees for Operation Services are typically invoiced to our customers on a time and materials basis monthly in arrears or using a fixed fee structure. Also included in Operation Services is revenue generated from the sales of spare parts to our customers as needed to service their System. Cost of Revenue Our cost of revenue is composed of the following for each of our distinct performance obligations: Systems : Systems cost of revenue consists primarily of material and labor consumed in the production and installation of Systems, as well as depreciation expense. The design, assembly, and installation of a System includes substantive customer-specified acceptance criteria that allow the customer to accept or reject Systems that do not meet the customer’s specifications. When we cannot objectively determine that acceptance criteria will be met upon contract inception, cost of revenue relating to Systems is deferred and expensed at a point in time upon final acceptance from the customer. If acceptance criteria can be reasonably certain upon contract inception, Systems cost of revenue is expensed as incurred. Software Maintenance and Support : Cost of revenue attributable to Software Maintenance and Support primarily relates to labor cost for our maintenance team providing routine technical support, and maintenance updates and upgrades to our customers. Software Maintenance and Support cost of revenue is expensed as incurred. Operation Services : Operation Services cost of revenue consists primarily of labor cost for our operations team who is providing assistance services to our customers. Operation Services cost of revenue also includes the cost of spare parts sold to our customers as needed to service their System. Operation Services cost of revenue is expensed as incurred. Research and Development Costs incurred in the research and development of our products are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs include personnel, contracted services, materials, and indirect costs involved in the design and development of new products and services, as well as depreciation expense. Selling, General, and Administrative Selling, general, and administrative expenses include all costs that are not directly related to satisfaction of customer contracts or research and development. Selling, general, and administrative expenses include items for our selling and administrative functions, such as sales, finance, legal, human resources, and information technology support. These functions include costs for items such as salaries and benefits and other personnel-related costs, maintenance and supplies, professional fees for external legal, accounting, and other consulting services, intangible asset amortization, and depreciation expense. Restructuring Charges Restructuring charges are costs associated with restructuring plans and are primarily related to employee severance and benefit arrangements, lower of cost and net realizable value adjustments to inventory and long-lived assets that will no longer be used in operations, and termination fees for any contracts cancelled as part of the restructuring plans. Other Income (Expense), Net Other income (expense), net primarily consists of dividend and interest income earned on our money market accounts and the impact of foreign currency transaction gains and losses associated with monetary assets and liabilities. Other income (expense) also consists of any gain, losses, or impairments on our strategic investments and derivative instruments. Income Taxes We are subject to U.S. federal income taxes, in addition to state and local income taxes, with respect to our allocable share of any taxable income or loss of Symbotic Holdings LLC. We also have foreign subsidiaries which are subject to income tax in their local jurisdictions. 50 Table of Contents Results of Operations for the Years Ended September 27, 2025 and September 28, 2024 The following tables set forth our results of operations for the periods presented and as a percentage of our total revenue for those periods. The data has been derived from the consolidated financial statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K which include, in our opinion, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, that we consider necessary for a fair statement of the financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. The period-to-period comparison of financial results is not necessarily indicative of financial results to be achieved in future periods. Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 (in thousands) Revenue: Systems $ 2,118,868 $ 1,705,440 Software maintenance and support 29,602 14,173 Operation services 98,452 68,566 Total revenue 2,246,922 1,788,179 Cost of revenue: Systems 1,710,446 1,466,841 Software maintenance and support 8,562 8,949 Operation services 105,304 66,723 Total cost of revenue 1,824,312 1,542,513 Gross profit 422,610 245,666 Operating expenses: Research and development expenses 216,013 173,457 Selling, general, and administrative expenses 298,730 188,934 Restructuring charges 22,873 — Total operating expenses 537,616 362,391 Operating loss (115,006) (116,725) Other income, net 36,063 37,042 Loss before income tax and equity method investment (78,943) (79,683) Income tax benefit (expense) 1,627 (4,212) Loss from equity method investment (13,716) (777) Net loss $ (91,032) $ (84,672) 51 Table of Contents Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 Revenue: Systems 94 % 95 % Software maintenance and support 1 1 Operation services 4 4 Total revenue 100 100 Cost of revenue: Systems 76 82 Software maintenance and support — 1 Operation services 5 4 Total cost of revenue 81 86 Gross profit 19 14 Operating expenses: Research and development expenses 10 10 Selling, general, and administrative expenses 13 11 Restructuring charges 1 — Total operating expenses 24 20 Operating loss (5) (7) Other income, net 2 2 Loss before income tax and equity method investment (4) (4) Income tax benefit (expense) — — Loss from equity method investment (1) — Net loss (4) % (5) % * Percentages are based on actual values. Totals may not sum due to rounding. Year Ended September 27, 2025 Compared to the Year Ended September 28, 2024 Revenue Year Ended Change September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 Amount % (dollars in thousands) Systems $ 2,118,868 $ 1,705,440 $ 413,428 24 % Software maintenance and support 29,602 14,173 15,429 109 Operation services 98,452 68,566 29,886 44 Total revenue $ 2,246,922 $ 1,788,179 $ 458,743 26 % Systems revenue increased for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, due to there being 50 Systems in Deployment for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to 44 Systems in Deployment for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2024. The increase in Systems revenue was also attributable to the additional revenue generated from the 2025 Walmart MAA for ASR. The increase in Software Maintenance and Support revenue is due to 48 Operational Systems which were under Software Maintenance and Support contracts for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to 25 Operational Systems which were under Software Maintenance and Support contracts for the year ended September 28, 2024. The increase in Operation Services revenue is attributable to an increase in Operational Systems where we were performing Operation Services for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024. 52 Table of Contents The increase results from the number of Operational Systems we have as well as spare parts sales to our customers for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024. As we continue to increase the number of Operational Systems, an increase in the number of Operation Services contracts is expected. Gross Profit The following table sets forth our gross profit for the years ended September 27, 2025 and September 28, 2024: Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 Change (in thousands) Systems $ 408,422 $ 238,599 $ 169,823 Software maintenance and support 21,040 5,224 15,816 Operation services (6,852) 1,843 (8,695) Total gross profit $ 422,610 $ 245,666 $ 176,944 Systems gross profit increased $169.8 million for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024. The increase in gross profit is primarily driven by 50 Systems in Deployment during the fiscal year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to 44 Systems in Deployment during the fiscal year ended September 28, 2024. The increase in Systems gross profit was further driven by lower cost of revenue resulting from better cost control. The increase in Software Maintenance and Support gross profit is driven by the revenue from the additional Operational Systems which were under Software Maintenance and Support contracts for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, while costs to perform our Software Maintenance and Support services remained relatively flat. The decrease in Operation Services gross profit for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, was driven by an increase in Operation Services costs at certain of our customer sites, certain loss contracts where Operation Services expense exceeded revenue, and a decrease in the mix in the profit generated from the sale of spare parts to our customers, which was partially offset by additional training services provided to our customers, and services related to the acquisition of ASR. Research and Development Expenses Year Ended Change September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 Amount % (dollars in thousands) Research and development $ 216,013 $ 173,457 $ 42,556 25 % Percentage of total revenue 10 % 10 % The increase in research and development expenses for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, is due to the following: Change (in thousands) Employee-related costs $ 15,282 Prototype-related costs, allocated overhead expenses, and other 27,274 $ 42,556 The primary driver for the increase in employee-related costs for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, was from an increase in engineering resources assigned to customer projects, which was 53 Table of Contents primarily related to the 2025 Walmart MAA. There was also an increase in the cost for contractors and consultants for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, which we use to support our growth. Prototyping-related costs, allocated overhead expenses, and other expenses increased for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, primarily from an increase in prototype expenses as we implement efforts to expand our current product offerings, as well as an increase in amortization expense attributable to the intangible assets that we acquired through our asset and business acquisition transactions. Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses Year Ended Change September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 Amount % (dollars in thousands) Selling, general, and administrative expenses $ 298,730 $ 188,934 $ 109,796 58 % Percentage of total revenue 13 % 11 % The increase in selling, general, and administrative expenses for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, is due to the following: Change (in thousands) Employee-related costs $ 85,913 Allocated overhead expenses and other 23,883 $ 109,796 Employee-related costs increased in the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, primarily as a result of our full-time employee and contractor headcount growth within our selling, general, and administrative functions. We increased our headcount primarily to support our rapid acceleration of System Deployments and business transformation. We incurred incremental costs related to building both shorter-term as well as permanent processes and infrastructure to ramp partnerships and operations. Allocated overhead and other expenses increased in the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, primarily due to an increase in information technology related costs to support growth within our employee base and infrastructure, as well as an increase in audit, tax, and legal expenses, primarily attributable to increased professional services fees related to strategic acquisitions and our internal controls remediation. Restructuring Charges Year Ended Change September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 Amount % (dollars in thousands) Restructuring charges $ 22,873 $ — $ 22,873 100 % Percentage of total revenue 1 % — % We incurred $22.9 million of restructuring charges for the year ended September 27, 2025 resulting from severance and other benefits expense primarily related to the reduction of workforce across all areas of the employees that joined the Company’s workforce in connection with the acquisition of ASR. A portion of these charges were reimbursed by Walmart in connection with the acquisition of ASR. 54 Table of Contents Other income, net Year Ended Change September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 Amount % (dollars in thousands) Other income, net $ 36,063 $ 37,042 $ (979) (3 %) Percentage of total revenue 2 % 2 % The decrease in other income, net for the year ended September 27, 2025, as compared to the year ended September 28, 2024, was due to less interest income earned during the year ended September 27, 2025 resulting from lower interest rates in the current fiscal year, despite a higher cash balance. The decrease in interest income was offset by other income earned on the fair value adjustment recorded during the year ended September 27, 2025 related to our warrants to purchase shares of a supplier. Income Taxes Year Ended Change September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 Amount % (dollars in thousands) Income tax benefit (expense) $ 1,627 $ (4,212) $ 5,839 139 % Percentage of total revenue nil nil We recorded an income tax benefit for the year ended September 27, 2025, primarily related to the release of $2.2 million valuation allowance related to our acquisition of ASR, as compared to an expense for the year ended September 28, 2024, which was primarily related to the establishment of $3.9 million of valuation allowance related to foreign deferred tax assets. Refer to Note 11, Income Taxes , for further information. Non-GAAP Financial Measures In addition to providing financial measurements based on GAAP, we provide additional financial metrics that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, or non-GAAP financial measures. We use these non-GAAP financial measures, in addition to GAAP financial measures, to understand and compare operating results across accounting periods, for financial and operational decision making, for planning and forecasting purposes, to measure executive compensation, and to evaluate our financial performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross profit margin, Adjusted research and development expenses, Adjusted selling, general, and administrative expenses, and free cash flow, as discussed below. We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures reflect our ongoing business in a manner that allows for meaningful comparisons and analysis of trends in the business, as it facilitates comparing financial results across accounting periods and to those of peer companies. We also believe that these non-GAAP financial measures enable investors to evaluate our operating results and future prospects in the same manner as we do. These non-GAAP financial measures may exclude expenses and gains that may be unusual in nature, infrequent, or not reflective of our ongoing operating results. The non-GAAP financial measures do not replace the presentation of our GAAP financial measures and should only be used as a supplement to, not as a substitute for, our financial results presented in accordance with GAAP. We consider Adjusted EBITDA to be an important indicator of the operational strength and performance of our business and a good measure of our historical operating trends. Adjusted EBITDA eliminates items that we do not consider to be part of our core operations. We define Adjusted EBITDA as GAAP net loss excluding the following items: interest income; income taxes; depreciation and amortization of tangible and intangible assets; stock-based compensation; business combination transaction expenses; equity method investment; internal control remediation; business transformation costs; fair value adjustments on strategic investments; restructuring charges; joint venture formation fees; equity financing transaction costs; and other infrequent items that may arise from time to time. 55 Table of Contents The non-GAAP adjustments, and our basis for excluding them from our non-GAAP financial measure, are outlined below: • Stock-based compensation – Although stock-based compensation is an important aspect of the compensation paid to our employees, the grant date fair value varies based on the derived stock price at the time of grant, varying valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions, and the variety of award types. This makes the comparison of our current financial results to previous and future periods difficult to interpret; therefore, we believe it is useful to exclude stock-based compensation from our non-GAAP financial measures in order to highlight the performance of our business and to be consistent with the way many investors evaluate our performance and compare our operating results to peer companies. Our stock-based compensation non-GAAP financial measures exclusion includes non-cash stock-based compensation expense and payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation awards. • Business combination transaction expenses – Business combination transaction expenses represent the expenses incurred related to strategic acquisition opportunities. It primarily includes investment banker fees, legal fees, professional fees for accountants, transaction fees, advisory fees, due diligence costs, certain other professional fees, and other direct costs associated with strategic activities. These amounts are impacted by the timing of the strategic acquisition opportunities which we may pursue. We exclude business combination transaction expenses from our non-GAAP financial measures to provide a useful comparison of our operating results between periods and to peer companies because such amounts vary significantly based on the magnitude of the transaction and do not reflect our core operations. • Restructuring charges – Restructuring charges are costs associated with restructuring plans and are primarily related to employee severance and benefit arrangements, lower of cost and net realizable value adjustments to inventory and long-lived assets that will no longer be used in operations, and termination fees for any contracts cancelled as part of the restructuring plan. The restructuring charges in fiscal year 2025 represent those charges incurred related to a reduction of our workforce across all areas of the employees that joined the Company’s workforce in connection with the acquisition of ASR. The restructuring charges in fiscal years 2023 and 2024 represent those charges incurred associated with certain actions to restructure parts of the Company within the U.S. and Canada. We exclude these items from our non-GAAP financial measures when evaluating our continuing business performance as such items vary significantly based on the magnitude of the restructuring action and do not reflect future expected operating expenses. In addition, these charges do not necessarily provide meaningful insight into the fundamentals of current or past operations of our business. • Internal control remediation – Internal control remediation costs represent professional services fees related to the Company’s efforts to remediate material weaknesses. We excluded these fees from our non-GAAP financial measures to provide a useful comparison of our operating results between periods and to our peer companies because such amounts are not representative of our normal operating activities. • Business transformation costs – Business transformation costs represent consultancy fees incurred for specific business initiatives that do not reflect the cost of normal business operations. We excluded these costs from our non-GAAP financial measures to provide a useful comparison of our operating results between periods and to our peer companies because such amounts are not representative of our normal operating activities. • Fair value adjustments on strategic investments – Fair value adjustments on strategic investments primarily consist of the gain or loss on strategic investments, which includes recurring fair value adjustments which are adjusted for observable price changes and any potential impairments. See Note 13, Fair Value Measures , included in this report for additional information on our strategic investment activity. We exclude fair value adjustments on strategic investments given the volatility in ongoing adjustments to the valuation of these strategic investments and because such adjustments are unrelated to the operating performance of our business. • Equity method investment – Equity method investment represents our proportionate share of income or loss of unconsolidated variable interest entities. We exclude this from our non-GAAP financial measures to provide a useful comparison of our operating results between periods and to our peer companies because such amounts are not representative of our normal operating activities. • CEO transition costs – CEO transition costs represent the costs incurred during 2023 associated with the separation agreement we entered into with Michael Loparco in November 2022. We exclude these transition costs from our non-GAAP financial measures because such amounts are not representative of our normal operating activities. 56 Table of Contents • Joint venture formation fees – Joint venture formation fees represent the charges incurred associated with the formation of GreenBox, which was established on July 21, 2023. It primarily includes investment banker fees, legal fees, transaction fees, advisory fees, and certain other professional fees. We exclude joint venture formation fees from our non-GAAP financial measures to provide a useful comparison of our operating results between periods and peer companies because such amounts do not reflect our core operations. • Equity financing transaction costs – Equity financing transaction costs represent the costs incurred, including for legal, professional fees for accountants, transaction fees, advisory fees, due diligence costs, and certain other professional fees that are directly related to an equity financing transaction. We excluded these costs from our non-GAAP financial measures to provide a useful comparison of our operating results between periods and to our peer companies because such amounts are not representative of our normal operating activities. The following table reconciles GAAP net loss to Adjusted EBITDA during the periods presented (in thousands): Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 September 30, 2023 Net loss $ (91,032) $ (84,672) $ (207,894) Interest income (31,456) (36,907) (11,391) Income tax expense (benefit) (1,627) 4,212 (4,619) Depreciation and amortization 39,617 20,845 9,475 Stock-based compensation 180,834 120,608 157,023 Business combination transaction expenses 7,562 324 — Restructuring charges 22,233 33,431 22,899 Internal control remediation 8,406 — — Business transformation costs 3,685 — — Fair value adjustments on strategic investments (4,481) — — Equity method investment 13,716 777 — CEO transition charges — — 2,026 Joint venture formation fees — 1,089 14,900 Equity financing transaction costs — 1,985 — Adjusted EBITDA $ 147,457 $ 61,692 $ (17,581) We consider Adjusted gross profit and Adjusted gross profit margin to be important indicators of profitability which we use in our financial and operational decision-making and evaluation of our overall operating performance. We define Adjusted gross profit, a non-GAAP financial measure, as GAAP gross profit excluding the following items: depreciation, stock-based compensation, and restructuring charges. We define Adjusted gross profit margin, a non-GAAP financial measure, as non-GAAP Adjusted gross profit divided by total revenue. The following table reconciles GAAP gross profit to Adjusted gross profit and gross profit margin to Adjusted gross profit margin during the periods presented (dollars in thousands): Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 September 30, 2023 Gross profit $ 422,610 $ 245,666 $ 189,739 Depreciation 10,414 7,748 639 Stock-based compensation 39,678 15,654 6,212 Restructuring charges (642) 33,431 19,766 Adjusted gross profit $ 472,060 $ 302,499 $ 216,356 57 Table of Contents Gross profit margin 18.8 % 13.7 % 16.1 % Adjusted gross profit margin 21.0 % 16.9 % 18.4 % We consider Adjusted research and development expenses and Adjusted selling, general, and administrative expenses to be important indicators of profitability which we use in our financial and operational decision-making and evaluation of our overall operating performance. We define Adjusted research and development expenses and Adjusted selling, general, and administrative expenses as GAAP research and development expense or selling, general, and administrative expense excluding the items indicated in the tables below. The following tables reconcile GAAP research and development expenses to Adjusted research and development expenses and GAAP selling, general, and administrative expenses to Adjusted selling, general, and administrative expenses during the periods presented (in thousands): Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 September 30, 2023 Research and development expenses $ 216,013 $ 173,457 $ 195,042 Depreciation and amortization (19,990) (4,883) (4,581) Stock-based compensation (57,213) (53,266) (69,729) Adjusted research and development expenses $ 138,810 $ 115,308 $ 120,732 Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 September 30, 2023 Selling, general, and administrative expenses $ 298,730 $ 188,934 $ 217,927 Depreciation and amortization (9,214) (8,220) (4,548) Stock-based compensation (83,943) (51,686) (80,823) Business combination transaction expenses (7,562) (324) — Internal control remediation (8,406) — — Business transformation costs (3,685) — — CEO transition costs — — (2,026) Joint venture formation fees — (1,089) (14,900) Equity financing transaction costs — (1,985) — Adjusted selling, general, and administrative expenses $ 185,920 $ 125,630 $ 115,630 We consider free cash flow to be an important indicator of financial liquidity, which we use in our financial and operational decision-making and evaluation of our overall operating performance. We define free cash flow as net cash provided by, or used in, operating activities less purchases of property and equipment and capitalization of internal use software development costs. The following table reconciles GAAP net cash provided by, or used in, operating activities to free cash flow during the periods presented (in thousands): Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 September 30, 2023 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 866,939 $ (58,077) $ 230,794 Purchases of property and equipment and capitalization of internal use software development costs (79,030) (44,374) (21,326) Free cash flow $ 787,909 $ (102,451) $ 209,468 Liquidity and Capital Resources As of September 27, 2025, our principal sources of liquidity were cash received from customers upon the inception and continuation of contracts to install Systems. 58 Table of Contents The following table shows net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities, net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) investing activities, and net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) financing activities during the periods presented: Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 (in thousands) Net cash provided by (used in): Operating activities $ 866,939 $ (58,077) Investing activities $ (350,742) $ 156,481 Financing activities $ 668 $ 371,036 Operating Activities Our net cash provided by operating activities consists of net loss adjusted for certain non-cash items, including depreciation and amortization, foreign currency gains and losses, loss on disposal of assets, provision for excess and obsolete inventory, and stock-based compensation, as well as changes in operating assets and liabilities. The primary changes in working capital items, such as the changes in accounts receivable and deferred revenue, result from the difference in timing of payments from our customers related to System Deployments and the associated costs incurred by us to fulfill the System performance obligation. This may result in an operating cash flow source or use for the period, depending on the timing of payments received as compared to the fulfillment of the System performance obligation. Net cash provided by operating activities was $866.9 million for the year ended September 27, 2025. Net cash provided by operating activities was driven by our net loss of $91.0 million, which was adjusted for non-cash items of $243.9 million, primarily consisting of $183.9 million stock-based compensation expense, $39.6 million depreciation and amortization, $7.1 million provision for excess and obsolete inventory, and $13.7 million loss from equity method investment. Changes in operating assets and liabilities from the prior fiscal year resulted in a source of cash for operating assets and liabilities of $714.0 million, and was mainly due to the timing of cash payments to vendors, cash receipts from customers, and the timing of invoicing to our customers. Net cash used in operating activities was $58.1 million for the year ended September 28, 2024. Net cash used in operating activities was due to our net loss of $84.7 million, which was adjusted for non-cash items of $164.0 million, primarily consisting of $112.2 million stock-based compensation expense, $20.8 million depreciation and amortization, $33.3 million provision for excess and obsolete inventory, offset by $10.1 million gain on investments. Changes in operating assets and liabilities from the prior fiscal year resulted in a use of cash for operating assets and liabilities of $137.4 million, and was mainly due to the timing of cash payments to vendors, cash receipts from customers, and the timing of invoicing to our customers. Investing Activities Our investing activities have consisted primarily of property and equipment purchases, capitalization of internal use software development costs, and acquisitions of strategic investments. Net cash and cash equivalents used in investing activities for the year ended September 27, 2025 consisted of $79.0 million of purchased property and equipment and capitalization of internal use software development fees. Additionally, during the year ended September 27, 2025, we purchased strategic investments in privately held companies in which we do not have a controlling interest for $129.9 million. Further, we incurred $141.8 million to acquire all of the outstanding equity interests of Walmart’s Advanced Systems & Robotics Inc. (“ASR”) business. Net cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities for the year ended September 28, 2024 consisted of $44.4 million of purchased property and equipment and capitalization of internal use software development fees. Additionally, during the year ended September 28, 2024, we purchased U.S. Treasury securities for $48.7 million, and received proceeds of $340.0 million upon the maturity of certain U.S. Treasury securities. We also acquired strategic investments of $90.5 million, which primarily consists of the investment we have made into the GreenBox VIE. 59 Table of Contents Financing Activities Our financing activities typically consist of payments and proceeds related to our equity incentive plans for both RSUs and ESPP, and also include proceeds from the exercise of the vested warrants issued to Walmart as well as proceeds from equity financing transactions. For the year ended September 27, 2025, the cash provided by financing activities primarily consisted of proceeds of $4.9 million in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock under the employee stock purchase plan, which was slightly offset by $3.0 million from payments we made for taxes related to the net share settlement of stock-based compensation awards. For the year ended September 28, 2024, the cash provided by financing activities primarily consisted of proceeds of $258.0 million related to the issuance of Class A common stock upon completion of our equity financing in March 2024. Cash of $158.7 million was also received in December 2023 related to the gross exercise by Walmart of their vested Warrant Units. To offset the receipt of cash, we incurred a payment of $48.2 million related to distributions to or on behalf of Symbotic Holdings LLC partners. Contractual Obligations and Commitments and Liquidity Outlook Our cash flows from operations along with equity infusions have historically been sufficient to fund our operating activities and other cash requirements. As of September 27, 2025, we have a cash and cash equivalents balance of $1,245.0 million. Our cash requirements for the year ended September 27, 2025 were primarily related to capital expenditures, inventory purchases in order to deliver to our customers our Systems in an orderly manner in line with our installation timelines, and purchases of strategic investments in order to diversify the composition of investment portfolio. We expect our current cash and cash equivalents, working capital, and our forecasted cash flows from operations to be sufficient to meet our foreseeable cash needs for at least the next 12 months. Our foreseeable cash needs, in addition to our recurring operating expenses, include our expected capital expenditures to support expansion of our infrastructure and workforce, funding to GreenBox which we may be required to make based on contractual commitments to them (as further disclosed within Note 17, Variable Interest Entities ), and minimum contractual obligations. Contractual obligations are cash that we are obligated to pay as part of certain contracts that we have entered into during our course of business. Our contractual obligations consist of operating lease liabilities that are included in our consolidated balance sheet and vendor commitments associated with agreements that are legally binding. Our operating lease cash requirements have not changed materially since September 28, 2024, and are disclosed within Note 5, Leases , included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our growth rate, the timing and extent of spending to support research and development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the introduction of new and enhanced product and service offerings, and the cost of any future acquisitions of technology or businesses. In the event that additional financing is required from outside sources, we may be unable to raise the funds on acceptable terms, if at all. The following table summarizes our current and long-term material cash requirements as of September 27, 2025 for our vendor commitments: Payments due in: Total Less than 1 Year 1-3 Years 3-5 Years More than 5 Years (in thousands) Vendor commitments $ 893,945 $ 790,029 $ 103,433 $ 322 $ 161 Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that can have a significant impact on our reported revenue, results of operations, and net income or loss, as well as on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our balance sheet during and as of the reporting periods. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are necessary because future events and their effects on our results and the value of our assets cannot be determined with certainty and are made based on our historical experience and on other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under 60 Table of Contents the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur or additional information is obtained, and we may periodically be faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within our control and may not be known for a prolonged period of time. Because the use of estimates is inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates. We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with the following critical accounting policies involve significant judgment and thus have the most significant potential impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. Revenue Recognition We generate revenue from the sale of products and services. A description of our revenue recognition policies is included in the Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Although most of our sales agreements contain standard terms and conditions, certain agreements contain multiple performance obligations or non-standard terms and conditions. For customer contracts that contain more than one performance obligation, we allocate the total transaction consideration to each performance obligation based on the relative observable stand-alone selling price of each performance obligation within the contract. To determine stand-alone selling price, we maximize the use of observable standalone sales and observable data, where available. When there is an insufficient history of standalone sales, we use judgment to estimate the standalone selling price. These estimates leverage available information that may include other observable inputs or use the expected cost-plus margin approach to estimate the price we would charge if the products and services were sold separately. We rely on either observable standalone sales or an expected cost plus a margin approach to determine the standalone selling price of offerings, depending on the nature of the performance obligation. As we further discuss in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the majority of contracts with customers entered into, revenue from the sales of our Systems is recognized over time as the asset created by our performance does not have alternative use to us and an enforceable right to payment for performance completed to date is present. We consider the contractual consideration payable by the customer and assess variable consideration that may affect the total transaction price, including contractual discounts, changes in total System contract cost estimates, contract incentive payments, shipping fees, inflation adjustments, and other sources of variable consideration, when determining the transaction price of each contract. We account for all consideration payable to a customer as a reduction of revenue. Consideration payable to a customer may include cash amounts we are obligated to pay or expect to pay a customer, as well as credits or other items that can be applied against amounts owed to us. Variable consideration revenue is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue will not occur and when collection is considered probable. We also account for any material right obligations identified to a customer as a reduction of revenue, such as a contingent promise to acquire additional products and services in the future. We recognize revenue as work progresses, using costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs at completion. Incurred costs represent work performed, which correspond with and best depict transfer of control to the customer. Contract costs are incurred over a period of time, which can span multiple years, and the estimation of these costs requires management’s judgment. Due to the nature of the work required to be performed on the Systems and our reliance on the availability and cost of materials required to be procured from third party vendors to build our Systems, the estimation of total revenue and cost at completion is complex, subject to many variables, and requires significant judgment on a contract-by-contract basis. As part of this process, we review information including, but not limited to, any outstanding key contract matters, progress towards completion and the related program schedule, identified risks and opportunities and the related changes in estimates of revenue and costs. The risks and opportunities relate to our judgment about the installation delays or performance issues that may or may not be within our control. Risks and opportunities may also relate to supply chain trends and commodity pricing, as well as changes in foreign currencies. Changes in estimates of net sales, cost of sales, and the related impact to operating profit are recognized on a cumulative catch-up basis, which recognizes the cumulative effect of the profit changes on current and prior periods based on a performance obligation’s percentage of completion in the current period. A significant change in one or more of these estimates could affect the profitability of one of more of our performance obligations and could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Stock-based Compensation We have three classes of common stock, Class A Common Stock, Class V-1 Common Stock, and Class V-3 Common Stock. 61 Table of Contents We typically issue restricted stock units (“RSUs”) as stock-based compensation. For RSUs, the fair value is the closing stock price on the grant date. We recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period for awards expected to vest. We account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than applying an estimated forfeiture rate. The graded-vesting method of expense recognition is applied to all awards with service-only conditions. Certain RSUs involve stock to be issued upon the achievement of certain performance conditions. Such RSUs become available, subject to time-based vesting conditions if, and to the extent that, financial performance criteria for the applicable period are achieved. Accordingly, the number of RSUs earned will vary based on the level of achievement of financial performance objectives for the applicable period. Until such time that our financial performance can ultimately be determined, each quarter we estimate the number of RSUs to be earned based on an evaluation of the probability of achieving the financial performance objectives. Such estimates are revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods when the underlying factors change our evaluation of the probability of achieving the financial performance objectives. Accordingly, stock-based compensation expense associated with performance-based RSUs may differ significantly from the amount recorded in the current period. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based compensation awards represents management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and we use different assumptions, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. Income Taxes Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when we believe that it is more-likely- than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in estimating valuation allowances for deferred tax assets. The realization of a deferred tax asset ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income in the applicable carryback or carryforward periods. We consider the nature, frequency, and severity of current and cumulative losses as well as the reversal of existing deferred tax liabilities, historical and forecasted taxable income (exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards) in our assessment. In evaluating such projections, we consider our history of profitability and cumulative earnings/losses, the competitive environment, and general economic conditions. In addition, we consider the timeframe over which it would take to utilize the deferred tax assets prior to their expiration. To the extent we determine that, based on the weight of available evidence, all or a portion of our valuation allowance is no longer necessary, we will recognize the change in the period such determination occurs. It is possible that such change to our valuation allowance could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and/or financial position. Changes in existing tax laws or rates could affect our actual tax results, and future business results may affect the amount of our deferred tax liabilities or the valuation of our deferred tax assets over time. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, particularly with respect to changes in facts and circumstances in future reporting periods, it is possible that actual results could differ from the estimates used in previous analyses. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future results could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations and/or financial position. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740 prescribes a two-step approach for the recognition and measurement of tax benefits associated with the positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return that affect amounts reported in the financial statements. We have reviewed and will continue to review the conclusions reached regarding uncertain tax positions, which may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on ongoing analyses of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. To the extent that our assessment of the conclusions reached regarding uncertain tax positions changes as a result of the evaluation of new information, such change in estimate will be recorded in the period in which such determination is made. We report income tax-related interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions, if applicable, as a component of income tax expense. Tax Receivable Agreement We entered into the TRA with Legacy Warehouse Holders that provides for the payment by the Company to the Legacy Warehouse Holders of 85% of the benefits, if any, that the Company realizes, or is deemed to realize (calculated using certain assumptions), as a result of (i) the existing tax basis in certain assets of New Symbotic Holdings that is allocable to the relevant New Symbotic Holdings Common Units, (ii) any step-up in tax basis in New Symbotic Holdings’ assets resulting from the relevant Exchanges and certain distributions (if any) by New Symbotic Holdings and payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and (iii) tax benefits related to imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement. We record liabilities for amounts payable under the TRA in the period in which the payment is deemed to be probable. 62 Table of Contents Payments made under the TRA represent payments that otherwise would have been made to taxing authorities in the absence of attributes obtained by us as a result of exchanges by the Legacy Warehouse Holders. Such amounts will be paid only when a cash tax savings is realized as a result of attributes subject to the TRA. That is, payments under the TRA are only expected to be made in periods following the filing of a tax return in which we are able to utilize certain tax benefits to reduce our cash taxes paid to a taxing authority. Amounts payable under the TRA are contingent upon, among other things, the generation of future taxable income. The projection of future taxable income involves significant judgment. In projecting future taxable income, we consider our historical results and incorporate certain assumptions including our growth rate and the amount, character, and timing of the taxable income in the future. Actual taxable income may differ from our estimates, which could significantly impact the liability under the TRA. The impact of any changes in the projected obligations under the TRA as a result of changes in the geographic mix of our earnings, changes in tax legislation and tax rates or other factors that may impact our tax savings will be reflected in income before taxes on the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period in which the change occurs. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements: As of September 27, 2025, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Instruction 8 to Item 303(b) of Regulation S-K. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements See Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of recently adopted accounting standards. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements See Note 2 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of certain recently issued accounting standards which may impact our financial statements in future reporting periods. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk We are exposed to market risk, including changes to interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Interest Rate Sensitivity We had cash and cash equivalents totaling $1,245.0 million and $727.3 million as of September 27, 2025, and September 28, 2024, respectively. Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and investments with original maturities of three months or less, are stated at cost, and approximate fair value. We were not exposed to material risks due to changes in market interest rates given the liquidity of the cash and investments with original maturities of three months or less. Foreign Currency Risk Although we are exposed to foreign currency risk from our international operations, we do not consider it to have a material impact. Certain of our transactions (and those of our subsidiaries) are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. Foreign currency transaction losses were less than $0.1 million for the years ended September 27, 2025, September 28, 2024 and September 30, 2023, and were recorded within other income, net on the consolidated statements of operations. Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are generally held with large financial institutions. Although the Company’s deposits may exceed federally insured limits, the financial institutions that the Company uses have high investment-grade credit ratings and, as a result, the Company believes that, as of September 27, 2025, its risk relating to deposits exceeding federally insured limits was not significant. The Company has no significant off-balance sheet risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts, or other hedging arrangements. The Company believes its credit policies are prudent and reflect normal industry terms and business risk. The Company generally does not require collateral from its customers and generally requires payment 30 days from the invoice date. At September 27, 2025 and September 28, 2024, one customer accounted for over 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance. 63 Table of Contents Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Symbotic Inc. Index to the Consolidated Financial Statements Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB ID No. 248 ) 65 Consolidated Balance Sheets 70 Consolidated Statements of Operations 72 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss 73 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) 74 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 76 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 78 64 Table of Contents Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of Directors and Shareholders Symbotic Inc. Opinion on the financial statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Symbotic Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 27, 2025 and September 28, 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 27, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 27, 2025 and September 28, 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 27, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2025, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”), and our report dated November 24, 2025 expressed an adverse opinion. Basis for opinion These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Critical audit matters The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate. Systems revenue – Estimation of Costs at Completion As described further in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company recognizes systems revenue over time using a cost-to-cost measure of progress. Under this method, revenue is recorded based on the ratio of costs incurred over total estimated costs at completion. The estimation of costs at completion is complex, requires significant judgment, and is subject to many variables such as the availability and cost of materials and services to be procured from third party vendors to build the Systems, outstanding key contract matters, progress towards completion and the related program schedule. We identified the estimation of costs at completion as a critical audit matter. The principal consideration for our determination that the estimation of costs at completion is a critical audit matter is management’s use of significant judgment when determining such cost estimates. Auditing these estimates required our especially challenging, subjective, and complex auditor judgment. Our audit procedures related to the estimation of costs at completion included the following, among others. 65 Table of Contents • We evaluated the appropriateness and consistency of the methods and processes and tested the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over the development of these cost estimates. • We inquired of project managers and others directly involved in building the Systems to evaluate management’s ability to satisfy the requirements of the contract, and to assess project status and challenges which may affect the cost estimates. • We evaluated the reasonableness of the significant judgments used by management to develop its cost estimates through reviewing key terms of the contracts, evaluating costs incurred to date relative to the system’s remaining tasks and timeline, and inspecting analyses and documentation used to support the cost estimates, as applicable. • We performed retrospective reviews when evaluating management’s estimation process by assessing estimates against actual outcomes, including the comparison of margin estimates of in-process contracts and actual margins generated by similar contracts that have been completed. • We tested the underlying data used in developing estimated costs at completion, including testing the completeness and accuracy of the actual costs incurred to-date. Accounting for Acquisition of Walmart’s Advanced Systems & Robotics Inc. (“ASR”) and Related Master Automation Agreement (“MAA”) As described further in Note 8 to the financial statements, in January 2025, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement (“the ASR Purchase Agreement”) with one of its customers, Walmart, to acquire Walmart Advanced Systems & Robotics (“ASR”) and concurrently executed a Master Automation Agreement (“MAA”) with Walmart to develop and produce prototypes of accelerated pickup and delivery systems (“APDs”). The Company determined that a portion of the $200 million payment made to Walmart under the ASR Purchase Agreement constituted consideration payable to Walmart, as a customer under the concurrent revenue arrangement, rather than payment for the acquisition of ASR. We identified the allocation of the $200 million payment made to Walmart between the acquisition of ASR from Walmart and the concurrent revenue arrangement to sell APDs to Walmart as a critical audit matter. The principal consideration for our determination that the allocation of the $200 million payment made to Walmart between the acquisition of ASR and the concurrent revenue arrangement is a critical audit matter is management’s use of significant judgment in (1) assessing whether the concurrent revenue and other arrangements represent transactions that are separate from the acquisition of ASR, and (2) estimating the fair value of the ASR business, which is used to adjust contractually stated amounts to reflect an amount that would be paid to acquire ASR without a concurrent revenue arrangement. Those matters required a high degree of auditor judgment and the involvement of professionals with skills in accounting for complex transactions, and our internal valuation experts. Our audit procedures related to the allocation of the $200 million payment made to Walmart between the acquisition of ASR and the concurrent revenue arrangement with Walmart included the following, among others: • We obtained and reviewed the executed ASR Purchase Agreement and MAA and conducted discussions with members of management who were involved in the negotiation of both contracts to understand the rationale behind the acquisition of ASR and the revenue arrangement with Walmart and the substance underlying the execution of these concurrent transactions. • We tested the design and operating effectiveness of internal control over the accounting for the acquisition of ASR and the concurrent revenue arrangement with Walmart. • With the involvement of professionals with skills in accounting for complex transactions, we evaluated management’s accounting conclusions with respect to the ASR Purchase Agreement and the MAA, including management’s assessment that the acquisition of ASR and the revenue arrangement with Walmart are concurrent but separate transactions and its determination that the excess of the $200 million payment to Walmart over the fair value of ASR should be allocated to the revenue arrangement with Walmart. • With the involvement of our internal valuation experts, we evaluated the reasonableness of the valuation methods, inputs, and assumptions and tested the underlying data used to determine the fair value of the ASR business as of the date of acquisition. 66 Table of Contents Systems Revenue – Recognition and Measurement of Material Rights As described above and in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company entered into an MAA with Walmart to develop and produce APD prototypes. Under the MAA, Walmart is contractually required to purchase 400 APDs if the prototypes outlined in the MAA satisfy agreed-upon performance metrics, along with the services that support the maintenance and operation of these APDs. The Company determined that the contingent promise to acquire additional goods and services in the future conveys a material right to Walmart. We determined the recognition and measurement of a material right in the MAA as a critical audit matter. The principal consideration for our determination that the recognition and measurement of a material right in the MAA is a critical audit matter is the complexity and significant judgment required in evaluating the significant assumptions used by management in (1) estimating the standalone selling price (“SSP”) of the performance obligations under the MAA, and (2) estimating the goods and services expected to be provided and their corresponding expected transaction price if Walmart exercises the material right conveyed by the MAA. Our audit procedures related to the recognition and measurement of a material right in the MAA included the following, among others: • We obtained and reviewed the MAA to evaluate whether the terms of the contract (including future purchase options) resulted in the existence of one or more material rights. • With the involvement of professionals with skills in accounting for complex transactions, we evaluated management’s accounting conclusions with respect to the standalone selling prices of performance obligations within the MAA, the recognition of a material right conveyed by the MAA, and the allocation of the transaction price to such material right. • We evaluated the reasonableness of the methods, inputs, and assumptions and tested the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used in estimating the SSPs of the performance obligations under the MAA, and the quantity and pricing of goods and services expected to be provided if Walmart exercises the material right conveyed by the MAA. /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2021. Boston, Massachusetts November 24, 2025 67 Table of Contents Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of Directors and Shareholders Symbotic Inc. Opinion on internal control over financial reporting We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Symbotic Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 27, 2025, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described in the following paragraphs on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 27, 2025, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment. The Company did not design effective controls over the timing of the recognition of cost of revenue, which impacts the timing of the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers that are accounted for under the cost-to-cost measure of progress. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended September 27, 2025. The material weakness identified above was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2025 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated November 24, 2025 which expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. Basis for opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. 68 Table of Contents Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Other information We do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the remediation plans or related actions described in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP Boston, Massachusetts November 24, 2025 69 Table of Contents Symbotic Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (in thousands, except share information) September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,244,993 $ 727,310 Accounts receivable 186,705 201,548 Unbilled accounts receivable 181,658 218,233 Inventories 164,390 106,136 Deferred expenses 20,532 1,058 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 92,050 101,252 Total current assets 1,890,328 1,355,537 Property and equipment, net 117,649 97,109 Intangible assets, net 79,149 3,664 Goodwill 59,871 — Equity method investment 123,034 81,289 Other assets 131,166 40,953 Total assets $ 2,401,197 $ 1,578,552 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 286,669 $ 175,188 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 200,442 165,644 Deferred revenue 1,242,312 676,314 Total current liabilities 1,729,423 1,017,146 Deferred revenue 124,932 129,233 Other liabilities 63,629 42,043 Total liabilities 1,917,984 1,188,422 Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) Equity: Class A Common Stock, 3,000,000,000 shares authorized, 112,635,932 and 104,689,377 shares issued and outstanding at September 27, 2025 and September 28, 2024, respectively 13 13 Class V-1 Common Stock, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 74,693,311 and 76,965,386 shares issued and outstanding at September 27, 2025 and September 28, 2024, respectively 7 7 Class V-3 Common Stock, 450,000,000 shares authorized, 403,559,196 and 404,309,196 shares issued and outstanding at September 27, 2025 and September 28, 2024, respectively 40 40 Additional paid-in capital 1,564,815 1,523,692 Accumulated deficit ( 1,340,862 ) ( 1,323,925 ) Accumulated other comprehensive loss ( 2,695 ) ( 2,594 ) 70 Table of Contents Total stockholders' equity 221,318 197,233 Noncontrolling interest 261,895 192,897 Total equity 483,213 390,130 Total liabilities and equity $ 2,401,197 $ 1,578,552 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 71 Table of Contents Symbotic Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands, except share and per share information) Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 September 30, 2023 Revenue: Systems $ 2,118,868 $ 1,705,440 $ 1,138,059 Software maintenance and support 29,602 14,173 6,601 Operation services 98,452 68,566 32,231 Total revenue 2,246,922 1,788,179 1,176,891 Cost of revenue: Systems 1,710,446 1,466,841 940,076 Software maintenance and support 8,562 8,949 9,222 Operation services 105,304 66,723 37,854 Total cost of revenue 1,824,312 1,542,513 987,152 Gross profit 422,610 245,666 189,739 Operating expenses: Research and development expenses 216,013 173,457 195,042 Selling, general, and administrative expenses 298,730 188,934 217,927 Restructuring charges 22,873 — — Total operating expenses 537,616 362,391 412,969 Operating loss ( 115,006 ) ( 116,725 ) ( 223,230 ) Other income, net 36,063 37,042 10,716 Loss before income tax and equity method investment ( 78,943 ) ( 79,683 ) ( 212,514 ) Income tax benefit (expense) 1,627 ( 4,212 ) 4,620 Loss from equity method investment ( 13,716 ) ( 777 ) — Net loss ( 91,032 ) ( 84,672 ) ( 207,894 ) Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests ( 74,095 ) ( 71,182 ) ( 184,028 ) Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ ( 16,937 ) $ ( 13,490 ) $ ( 23,866 ) Loss per share of Class A Common Stock: Basic and Diluted $ ( 0.16 ) $ ( 0.14 ) $ ( 0.37 ) Weighted-average shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding: Basic and Diluted 108,670,159 95,697,368 64,338,580 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 72 Table of Contents Symbotic Inc. Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss (in thousands) Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 September 30, 2023 Net loss $ ( 91,032 ) $ ( 84,672 ) $ ( 207,894 ) Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests ( 74,095 ) ( 71,182 ) ( 184,028 ) Net loss attributable to common stockholders $ ( 16,937 ) $ ( 13,490 ) $ ( 23,866 ) Other comprehensive income (loss): Foreign currency translation adjustments ( 556 ) ( 75 ) ( 265 ) Changes in unrealized gain on investments, net of income taxes of $ — for the years ended September 27, 2025, September 28, 2024, and September 30, 2023 — ( 5,481 ) 5,478 Total other comprehensive income (loss) ( 556 ) ( 5,556 ) 5,213 Less: other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests ( 455 ) ( 4,649 ) 4,606 Other comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders $ ( 101 ) $ ( 907 ) $ 607 Comprehensive loss ( 91,588 ) ( 90,228 ) ( 202,681 ) Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests ( 74,550 ) ( 75,831 ) ( 179,422 ) Total comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders $ ( 17,038 ) $ ( 14,397 ) $ ( 23,259 ) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 73 Table of Contents Symbotic Inc. Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (in thousands, except unit and share information) Additional Paid-In Capital - Warrants Additional Paid-In Capital Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Accumulated Deficit Noncontrolling Interest Total Equity (Deficit) Class A Common Stock Class V-1 Common Stock Class V-3 Common Stock Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Balance at September 24, 2022 57,718,836 6 79,237,388 8 416,933,025 42 58,126 1,237,865 ( 2,294 ) ( 1,286,569 ) 61,756 68,940 Net loss — — — — — — — — — ( 23,866 ) ( 184,028 ) ( 207,894 ) Issuance of common stock under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes 2,825,576 — — — — — — ( 3,337 ) — — ( 23,161 ) ( 26,498 ) Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan, net of shares withheld for employee taxes 225,788 — — — — — — 91 — — 704 795 Exchange of Class V-1 and Class V-3 common stock 21,342,681 2 ( 11,938,597 ) ( 1 ) ( 9,404,084 ) ( 1 ) — 956 — — ( 956 ) — Cancellation of Class V-1 common stock — — ( 367,694 ) — — — — — — — — — Stock-based compensation — — — — — — — 18,447 — — 138,281 156,728 Other comprehensive loss — — — — — — — — 607 — 4,606 5,213 Balance at September 30, 2023 82,112,881 8 66,931,097 7 407,528,941 41 58,126 1,254,022 ( 1,687 ) ( 1,310,435 ) ( 2,798 ) ( 2,716 ) Net loss — — — — — — — — — ( 13,490 ) ( 71,182 ) ( 84,672 ) Issuance of common stock under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes 6,790,081 1 — — — — — ( 3,103 ) — — ( 50 ) ( 3,152 ) Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan, net of shares withheld for employee taxes 230,548 — — — — — — 5,465 — — — 5,465 Exchange of Class V-1 and Class V-3 common stock 9,055,867 3 ( 5,836,122 ) ( 3 ) ( 3,219,745 ) ( 1 ) — ( 9,747 ) — — 9,747 ( 1 ) Issuance of common stock in connection with equity offering 6,500,000 1 — — — — — 257,985 — — — 257,986 Distributions to Symbotic Holdings LLC partners — — — — — — — — — — ( 48,413 ) ( 48,413 ) Stock-based compensation — — — — — — — 19,070 — — 93,414 112,484 Other comprehensive loss — — — — — — — — ( 907 ) — ( 4,649 ) ( 5,556 ) Exercise of warrants — — 15,870,411 3 — — ( 58,126 ) — — — 216,828 158,705 Balance at September 28, 2024 104,689,377 $ 13 76,965,386 $ 7 404,309,196 $ 40 $ — $ 1,523,692 $ ( 2,594 ) $ ( 1,323,925 ) $ 192,897 $ 390,130 Net loss — — — — — — — — — ( 16,937 ) ( 74,095 ) ( 91,032 ) Issuance of common stock under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes 4,756,526 — — — — — — ( 3,012 ) — — — ( 3,012 ) Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan, net of shares withheld for employee taxes 364,855 — — — — — — 4,851 — — — 4,851 Exchange of Class V-1 common stock 2,825,174 — ( 2,075,174 ) — ( 750,000 ) — — 4,964 — — ( 4,964 ) — Cancellation of Class V-1 common stock — — ( 196,901 ) — — — — — — — — — 74 Table of Contents Distribution to Symbotic Holdings LLC partners — — — — — — — ( 6 ) — — ( 1,176 ) ( 1,182 ) Stock-based compensation — — — — — — — 34,326 — — 149,688 184,014 Other comprehensive loss — — — — — — — — ( 101 ) — ( 455 ) ( 556 ) Balance at September 27, 2025 112,635,932 $ 13 74,693,311 $ 7 403,559,196 $ 40 $ — $ 1,564,815 $ ( 2,695 ) $ ( 1,340,862 ) $ 261,895 $ 483,213 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 75 Table of Contents Symbotic Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands) Year Ended September 27, 2025 September 28, 2024 September 30, 2023 Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss $ ( 91,032 ) $ ( 84,672 ) $ ( 207,894 ) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 39,604 20,847 9,476 Amortization of leases 4,525 2,633 1,835 Restructuring of leases 3,469 — — Loss from equity method investment 13,716 777 — Foreign currency gains ( 33 ) ( 8 ) ( 3 ) Gain on investments — ( 10,084 ) — Loss on disposal of assets 264 337 2,914 Provision for excess and obsolete inventory 7,148 33,330 22,276 Deferred taxes, net ( 4,205 ) 3,917 ( 4,620 ) Stock-based compensation 183,936 112,208 154,227 Gain from strategic investment fair value adjustment ( 4,481 ) — — Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 15,075 ( 132,305 ) ( 65,817 ) Inventories ( 58,876 ) 103 ( 66,380 ) Prepaid expenses and other current assets 70,386 ( 112,050 ) ( 78,906 ) Deferred expenses 21,993 ( 4,936 ) ( 5,428 ) Other assets 8,696 ( 9,040 ) ( 18,635 ) Accounts payable 96,904 65,270 41,415 Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 10,356 38,467 64,743 Deferred revenue 606,406 18,318 361,518 Acquisition-related consideration paid to customer ( 45,000 ) — — Other liabilities ( 11,912 ) ( 1,189 ) 20,073 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 866,939 ( 58,077 ) 230,794 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of property and equipment and capitalization of internal use software development costs ( 79,030 ) ( 44,374 ) ( 21,326 ) Acquisitions of strategic investments ( 129,881 ) ( 90,485 ) — Cash paid for business acquisitions ( 141,831 ) — — Proceeds from sale of assets — — 71 Proceeds from maturities of marketable securities — 340,000 130,000 Purchases of marketable securities — ( 48,660 ) ( 408,209 ) Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities ( 350,742 ) 156,481 ( 299,464 ) Cash flows from financing activities: Payment for taxes related to net share settlement of stock-based compensation awards ( 3,012 ) ( 3,181 ) ( 26,674 ) 76 Table of Contents Net proceeds from issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan 4,855 5,743 2,573 Proceeds from issuance of Class A Common Stock — 257,985 — Proceeds from exercise of warrants — 158,704 — Distributions to or on behalf of Symbotic Holdings LLC partners ( 1,175 ) ( 48,215 ) — Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 668 371,036 ( 24,101 ) Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash ( 26 ) ( 4 ) 232 Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash 516,839 469,436 ( 92,539 ) Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash —beginning of period 730,354 260,918 353,457 Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash —end of period $ 1,247,193 $ 730,354 $ 260,918 Non-cash activities: Operating lease right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities $ 13,113 $ 5,818 $ 8,734 Transfer of inventories to property and equipment $ 7,982 $ 38,454 $ — Transfer of equipment from property and equipment to deferred expenses $ 41,467 $ — $ — Transfer of equipment from property and equipment to other assets $ 16,629 $ — $ — Warrant associated with supplier agreement $ — $ 12,308 $ — The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 77 Table of Contents Symbotic Inc. Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 1. Organization and Operations SVF Investment Corp. 3, formerly known as SVF Investment III Corp., (“SVF 3” and, after the Domestication as described below, “Symbotic” or the “Company”) was a blank check company incorporated as a Cayman Islands exempted company on December 11, 2020. SVF 3 was incorporated for the purpose of effecting a merger, share exchange, asset acquisition, share purchase, reorganization, or similar business combination with one or more businesses. Warehouse Technologies LLC (“Legacy Warehouse”), a New Hampshire limited liability company, was formed in December 2006 to make investments in companies that develop new technologies to improve operating efficiencies in modern warehouses. Symbotic LLC, a technology company that develops and commercializes innovative technologies for use within warehouse operations and Symbotic Group Holdings, ULC (“Symbotic Canada”) were wholly-owned subsidiaries of Legacy Warehouse. On December 12, 2021, (i) SVF 3 entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Legacy Warehouse, Symbotic Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Symbotic Holdings”), and Saturn Acquisition (DE) Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of SVF 3 (“Merger Sub”) and (ii) Legacy Warehouse entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Company Merger Agreement”) with Symbotic Holdings. On June 7, 2022, as contemplated by the Company Merger Agreement, Legacy Warehouse merged with and into Symbotic Holdings (the “Company Reorganization”), with Symbotic Holdings surviving the merger (“Interim Symbotic”). Immediately following such merger, on June 7, 2022, as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, SVF 3 filed a notice of deregistration with the Cayman Islands Registrar of Companies, together with the necessary accompanying documents, and filed a certificate of incorporation and a certificate of corporate domestication with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, under which SVF 3 was transferred by way of continuation from the Cayman Islands and domesticated as a Delaware corporation, changing its name to “Symbotic Inc.” (the “Domestication”). Immediately following the Domestication of SVF 3, on June 7, 2022, as contemplated by the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into Interim Symbotic (the “Merger” and, together with the Company Reorganization, the “Business Combination”), with Interim Symbotic surviving the merger as a subsidiary of Symbotic (“New Symbotic Holdings”). The Business Combination resulted in an umbrella partnership corporation (“Up-C”) structure, which is often used by partnerships and limited liability companies (operating as partnerships) undertaking an initial public offering. The Up-C structure allowed Legacy Warehouse equity holders (the “Legacy Warehouse Holders”) to retain their equity ownership in Symbotic Holdings, an entity that is classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and provides potential future tax benefits for Symbotic when the Legacy Warehouse Holders ultimately redeem their pass-through interests for shares of Class A Common Stock in Symbotic Inc. Under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement (“TRA”), 85 % of these potential future tax benefits realized by Symbotic Inc. as a result of such redemptions will be paid to certain Legacy Warehouse Holders (the “TRA Holders”). Symbotic is an automation technology company established to develop technologies to improve operating efficiencies in modern warehouses. The Company's vision is to make the supply chain work better for everyone. The Company does this by developing, commercializing, and deploying innovative and comprehensive technology solutions that dramatically improve supply chain operations. The Company automates the processing of pallets, cases and individual items in warehouses. Its Systems enhance operations at the front end of the supply chain, and therefore benefit all supply partners further down the chain, irrespective of fulfillment strategy. The Company's headquarters are located in Wilmington, Massachusetts. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation and Foreign Currency Translation The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in U.S. dollars, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and majority-owned subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements include 100% of the accounts of wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and the ownership interest of the minority investors are recorded as a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The functional currency for the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is based on the subsidiaries’ financial and operational environment and is the applicable local currency. For the Company’s subsidiaries that transact in a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at period-end foreign exchange rates. Revenue and 78 Table of Contents