FULLTEXT DEL 4 AV 7
10-K – 2026-02-27 – cg-20251231.htm
Investments in the natural resources industry, including the infrastructure, energy, power, and renewables industries, involve various operational, construction, and regulatory risks. Our natural resources, infrastructure, energy, power, and renewables investments involve significant construction, operational, regulatory, environmental, and market risks, any of which could materially affect performance and value. Natural Resources. Natural resources portfolio companies may experience labor and fuel or material shortages, construction delays and cost overruns, permitting delays, adverse weather and site conditions, equipment failures and accidents, financing challenges, and force majeure events, which can cause unexpected delays, higher debt service, insufficient funds to complete projects, limited cash flow during development, operating deficits, lost revenues, increased operating and maintenance costs, and construction-related claims. Infrastructure. Infrastructure investments face risks from changes in input costs and availability, political and regulatory actions (including climate initiatives), macroeconomic conditions, demographic and demand shifts, competition, natural disasters and weather changes, major customer distress, and war or terrorism, which can reduce revenues, increase costs to build, operate, maintain, or restore assets, impair debt repayment and distributions, or lead to termination of concessions, and insurance may not fully cover resulting losses. Infrastructure assets are also subject to extensive and discretionary government regulation and often depend on permits, licenses, concessions, leases, and contracts that give government counterparties significant influence, including the ability to impose restrictive terms or terminate arrangements without adequate compensation, which can limit a portfolio company’s ability to maximize cash flow and profitability. Energy and Power. Energy and power investments are exposed to operational risks such as mechanical or structural failures, accidents, labor issues, or underperforming technology , as well as external factors such as economic developments, changes in fuel or feedstock prices, government policies, and shifts in energy demand, any of which can reduce revenues, increase costs, impair debt repayment, or necessitate decommissioning that may be lengthy and costly. Development-stage investments including transmission and power facilities, face additional risks relating to timely zoning and regulatory approvals, construction timing and cost (including weather, labor, and material risks), and access to construction and permanent financing, which can cause delays, cost overruns, or failure to complete projects, adversely affecting a portfolio company’s financial condition and results of operations. Electric utility investments in the United States and abroad are also subject to increasing competitive pressures due to changing consumer demand, technological advances, greater natural gas availability, and regulatory changes that may drive consolidation or disaggregation of vertically integrated utilities, enabling additional significant competitors in the independent power industry. Investments in hydrocarbon producers face increasing climate‑related risks, as combustion of hydrocarbons emits greenhouse gases, and regulators, investors, consumers, and other stakeholders are advancing or considering cap‑and‑trade systems, carbon taxes, restrictive permitting, efficiency standards, climate‑related reporting, and incentives or mandates for renewables, which can increase costs, lengthen project timelines, reduce hydrocarbon demand, shift demand to lower‑carbon fuels, promote alternatives, and heighten activism, litigation, enforcement, and lender scrutiny, all of which may hinder financing, exits, or expected returns. Our investments also depend on initial and ongoing regulatory approvals, licenses, permits, and tax and financial rulings, and there is no assurance that portfolio companies will obtain, modify, or maintain all required approvals. In this regard, delays or failures in satisfying associated conditions can prevent facility operations, restrict sales, increase costs, and adversely affect returns. Renewables . Renewable energy investments depend on complex resource and market estimates (such as solar irradiance and wind or water flow), which are sensitive to changing assumptions and market conditions, and on supportive government policies and incentives (including tax credits, grants, portfolio standards, renewable energy credits, and similar programs in the United States, the European Union, and other jurisdictions). Any reduction, elimination, or reversal of such support, or a shift toward more carbon‑intensive energy policies, could render projects uneconomic, harm renewable portfolio companies’ financial condition and results and, conversely, policies favoring renewables may negatively affect non‑renewable energy investments. Environmental and health and safety laws, regulations, and initiatives (including climate‑related measures) materially affect natural resources, infrastructure, energy and power, and renewable energy investments, as projects face changing and increasingly stringent compliance and permitting requirements that can both create opportunities (for example, increased demand for gas and renewables) and require significant expenditures that reduce returns, while regulatory authorities, NGOs, and special interest groups continue to exert substantial oversight and influence. 78 Table of Contents Climate change and regulatory and other efforts to reduce climate change could adversely affect our business. We and our funds’ portfolio companies face a number of risks associated with climate change, including both transition and physical risks. The transition risks that could impact our company and our funds’ investments in portfolio companies include those risks related to the impact of current and potential U.S. and foreign climate-and ESG-related legislation and regulation, as well as risks arising from climate-related business trends. In addition, we and our funds’ investments in portfolio companies are subject to risks stemming from the physical impacts of climate change. New climate change-related regulations or interpretations of existing laws may result in enhanced or conflicting disclosure obligations that could negatively affect us or our funds’ investments in portfolio companies and also materially increase our regulatory burden. Increased and/or conflicting applicable or proposed regulations generally increase the costs to us, our funds, and our funds’ portfolio companies, and those higher costs may continue to increase if new laws require additional resources. Moreover, significant increases in regulatory compliance expenses may negatively impact our funds and their portfolio company investments. In particular, compliance with climate and other sustainability or ESG-related rules in the European Union and the United Kingdom is expected to result in increased legal and compliance costs and expenses, which would be borne by us, our funds, and/or our funds’ portfolio companies. In addition, our funds’ portfolio companies could face transition risk if GHG-related regulations or taxes are implemented. See “Risks Related to Regulation and Litigation— Regulatory initiatives in jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our business” and “ Increasing scrutiny from stakeholders on sustainability matters, including our ESG reporting, exposes us to reputational and other risks.” We also face business trend-related climate risks. Certain fund investors are increasingly taking into account the consideration for or lack of ESG factors, including climate risks, in determining whether to invest in the funds we manage. In addition, our reputation and investor relationships could be damaged as a result of our involvement, or our funds’ involvement, in certain industries, portfolio companies, or transactions associated with activities perceived to be causing or exacerbating climate change, as well as any decisions we make to continue to conduct or change our activities in response to considerations relating to climate change. Moreover, significant physical effects of climate change, including extreme weather events, such as hurricanes, wildfires, or floods, also can have an adverse impact on certain of our funds’ investments in portfolio companies and other investments, particularly real asset and infrastructure investments and portfolio companies that rely on physical factories, plants, or stores located in affected areas. As the effects of climate change increase, we expect the frequency and impact of weather and climate related events and conditions to increase as well. Investments in the insurance industry (including our investment in Fortitude) could be adversely impacted by insurance regulations and potential regulatory reforms. Carlyle FRL, L.P., an affiliated investment fund (“Carlyle FRL”), holds a controlling interest in Fortitude, inclusive of our 10.5% interest. The insurance industry is highly regulated and the regulators in many jurisdictions have broad, and in some cases discretionary, authority over insurance companies, including, among other things, with respect to marketing practices, policy rate increases, reserve requirements, capital adequacy, permissible investments, and affiliate transactions. In addition, the insurance sector is subject to frequent regulatory change. While we intend to invest in companies and acquire businesses that seek to comply with applicable laws and regulations, the laws and regulations relating to the insurance industry are complex, may be ambiguous, or may lack clear judicial or regulatory interpretive guidance. Even where laws or regulations purport to be the same across different jurisdictions, they may be inconsistently applied by the regulators of the different jurisdictions. In terms of regulatory changes, the following changes in particular may affect the operations and prospects of our investments in the insurance industry, including Fortitude: (i) changes to interest rates and policies of central banks and regulatory authorities; (ii) changes in applicable direct or indirect taxes, levies or charges; (iii) changes in government or regulatory policy that may significantly influence investor decisions in particular markets in which our investments operate; (iv) changes relating to the capital adequacy framework and rules designed to promote financial stability, both on an individual reinsurance company level and on a group level; (v) changes to policyholder protections; (vi) changes related to the regulation of investment management arrangements between insurers and controlling or related asset managers; and (vii) developments in financial reporting. An adverse review or determination by any applicable judicial or regulatory authority of any such law or regulation, or an adverse change in applicable regulatory requirements, judicial or regulatory interpretation, or reimbursement programs, could have a material adverse effect on the operations and/or financial performance of our investments in the insurance industry (including Fortitude) and may increase their compliance and legal costs. Any such costs could negatively impact the value of our investments and the returns we are able to generate on such investments. S ee “Risks Related to Our Company—Adverse economic and market conditions and other events or conditions throughout the world could negatively 79 Table of Contents impact our business in many ways, including by reducing the value or performance of the investments made by our investment funds and reducing the ability of our investment funds to raise capital, any of which could materially reduce our revenue, earnings, and cash flow and adversely affect our financial prospects and condition.” Insurance regulatory authorities and regulatory organizations continue to scrutinize alternative asset managers’ involvement in the insurance industry, including with respect to the ownership by such managers or their affiliated funds of, and the management of assets on behalf of, insurance companies. For example, insurance regulators increasingly have focused on the terms and structure of investment management agreements, including whether they are at arms’ length, establish control of the insurance company, grant the asset manager excessive authority over the investment strategy of the insurance company, provide for management fees that are not fair and reasonable, or termination provisions that make it difficult or costly for the insurer to terminate the agreement. Regulators also have increasingly focused on the risk profile of certain investments held by insurance companies (including, without limitation, structured credit assets such as collateralized loan obligations), appropriateness of investment ratings and potential conflicts of interest (including affiliated investments), and potential misalignment of incentives and any potential risks from these and other aspects of an insurance company’s relationship with alternative asset managers that may impact the insurance company’s risk profile. This enhanced scrutiny may increase the risk of regulatory actions against us and could result in new or amended regulations that limit our ability, or make it more burdensome or costly, to enter into investment management or advisory agreements with insurance companies and thereby grow our insurance strategy. Our relationship with Fortitude may not generate a meaningful contribution to our revenue and our indirect ownership of Fortitude could give rise to real or apparent conflicts of interest. While we expect to derive a meaningful contribution to our revenue across our business segments from our investment in and strategic asset management relationship with Fortitude, as described in Note 4 , Investments , to Part II, Item 8 “Investments—Investment in Fortitude,” we may not be successful in doing so. Pursuant to investment management agreements into which we have entered with Fortitude subsidiaries and certain companies with which they have reinsurance agreements (the “Reinsurance Counterparties”), certain of our subsidiaries receive performance fees and/or management fees from carry funds and separately managed accounts into which Fortitude Re, its affiliates, and the Reinsurance Counterparties invest. The Company and Fortitude own interests in FCA Re, a Bermuda-domiciled reinsurance company that reinsures liabilities of affiliates of Fortitude and is a Reinsurance Counterparty. Through our subsidiaries, we managed or advised $24.6 billion of capital attributable to investments made under these investment management agreements, as of December 31, 2025 . In addition, in April 2022 and December 2024, we entered into strategic advisory services agreements with certain subsidiaries of Fortitude and an affiliate of FCA Re, respectively, through our insurance investment advisor, Carlyle Insurance Solutions Management L.L.C. (“CISM”). Under the agreements, CISM provides the clients with certain services, including business development and growth, transaction origination and execution, and capital management services in exchange for a recurring management fee based on the client’s general account assets, which, with respect to the agreement with Fortitude’s subsidiaries, adjusts within an agreed range based on Fortitude’s overall profitability. Such management fee may decline if there is a corresponding decline in the fair value of the assets we manage and/or the performance of the portfolio. Our investment management and advisory agreements with Fortitude subsidiaries and the Reinsurance Counterparties are terminable under certain circumstances. If such agreements were terminated, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition. There can be no assurance that the benefit we receive from Fortitude subsidiaries will not decline due to a disruption or decline in Fortitude’s business or a change in our relationship with Fortitude, including our investment income from our indirect interest in Fortitude and/or investment management or advisory agreements with Fortitude subsidiaries and the Reinsurance Counterparties. We may be unable to replace a decline in the revenue derived from investments made in our funds and entities by Fortitude Re and/or the Reinsurance Counterparties on a timely basis if our relationship with Fortitude were to change or if Fortitude were to experience a material adverse impact to its business. Carlyle FRL owns a controlling interest in Fortitude and has the right to appoint a majority of its board of directors. As a result, there may be real or apparent conflicts of interest with respect to matters affecting the Company, Carlyle-managed funds, and their portfolio companies and Fortitude, including with respect to the fiduciary duties that our employees that are board members owe to Fortitude in addition to the duties that they have to the Company. In addition, conflicts of interest could arise with respect to transactions involving business dealings between the Company, Fortitude, and each of their respective affiliates. The foregoing conflicts of interest may also arise with respect to subsidiaries of Fortitude. Our funds’ investments in the life sciences industry may expose us to increased risks. Investments in life sciences may expose us to increased risks. For example: 80 Table of Contents • Life sciences and healthcare companies are subject to extensive regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, similar foreign regulatory authorities and, to a lesser extent, other federal and state agencies. These companies are subject to the expense, delay, and uncertainty of the product approval process, and there can be no guarantee that a particular product candidate will obtain regulatory approval. In addition, the current regulatory framework may change or additional regulations may arise at any stage during the product development phase of an investment, which may delay or prevent regulatory approval or impact applicable exclusivity periods. If a company in which our funds are invested is unable to obtain regulatory approval for a product candidate, or a product candidate in which our funds are invested does not obtain regulatory approval, in a timely fashion or at all, the value of our funds’ investment would be adversely impacted. Moreover, a clinical trial (including enrollment therein) or regulatory approval process for pharmaceuticals has and may in the future be delayed, otherwise hindered, or abandoned as a result of epidemics (including COVID-19), which could have a negative impact on the ability of the investment to engage in trials or receive approvals, and thereby could adversely affect the performance of the investment. In the event such clinical trials do not comply with the complicated regulatory requirements applicable thereto, such companies may be subject to regulatory actions. • I ntellectual property often constitutes an important part of a life sciences company’s assets and competitive strengths, particularly for royalty monetization and corporate partnership transactions. To the extent such companies’ intellectual property positions with respect to products in which our life sciences business invests, whether through a royalty monetization or otherwise, are challenged, invalidated, or circumvented, the value of our life sciences business’s investment may be impaired. The success of a life sciences investment depends in part on the ability of the biopharmaceutical companies in whose products our life sciences business invests to obtain and defend patent rights and other intellectual property rights that are important to the commercialization of such products. The patent positions of such companies can be highly uncertain and often involve complex legal, scientific, and factual questions. • The commercial success of products could be compromised if governmental or third-party payers do not provide coverage and reimbursement, breach, rescind, or modify their contracts or reimbursement policies or delay payments for such products. In both the United States and foreign markets, the successful sale of a life sciences company’s product depends on the ability to obtain and maintain adequate coverage and reimbursement from third-party payers, including government healthcare programs and private insurance plans. Governments and third-party payers continue to pursue aggressive initiatives to contain costs and manage drug utilization and are increasingly focused on the effectiveness, benefits, and costs of similar treatments, which could result in lower reimbursement rates and narrower populations for whom the products in which our life sciences business invests will be reimbursed by payers. For example, in the United States, federal legislation has passed that modifies coverage, reimbursement, and pricing policies for certain products. Regulatory agencies have provided guidance on how they intend to implement certain components of the legislation. In addition, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services has indicated the potential for substantial policy and personnel changes. In general, as regulatory agencies and others develop policies and continue to define and implement legislation, such policies and legislation may result in lower product prices, altered market dynamics, lower consumer demand for certain products, or the unavailability of adequate third-party payer reimbursement to enable our life sciences business to realize an appropriate return on its investment. • Our life sciences business’s strategies include its clinical co-development (CCD) strategy, which seeks to generate investment returns by identifying and financing pharmaceutical drug candidates in late-stage development through regulatory approval for a pharmaceutical or biotech counterparty, typically for a pre- negotiated, structured return that is payable should regulatory approval be obtained. Our life sciences business’s ability to source such transactions is dependent on its ability to identify, diligence, and agree to the development funding arrangements with the counterparty in a competitive market. CCD investments are typically made via investor subscriptions in a special purpose vehicle (SPV) that finances the relevant late- stage clinical trial. There is a risk that the clinical trial does not result in approval by the relevant clinical regulatory agency, for example as a result of failure to demonstrate efficacy, safety concerns, failure to recruit trial subjects, or unforeseen regulatory concerns. If the clinical trial does not result in approval, then it is highly likely that each investor in the SPV will lose its entire investment. In addition, such investments may be exposed to losses in the event that the counterparty fails to meet its obligation to make contractually agreed payments. If the trial achieves approval by the clinical regulatory agency, the counterparty’s payment obligations will usually extend over a number of years. It may be possible to improve rates of return by 81 Table of Contents monetizing the payments, but this may not always be possible. The returns available from successful CCD transactions may also be capped by the terms agreed with the counterparty. The aviation leasing industry is subject to significant volatility and may expose us to additional risks . Carlyle Aviation Partners participates in the aircraft leasing industry, which has historically been cyclical in nature for a number of reasons outside the control of industry participants, including: the demand for aviation travel; geopolitical conflicts and other events, including wars, civil disturbances, acts of terrorism, outbreaks of epidemic diseases and natural disasters; governmental regulation, including regulation of trade, such as the imposition of import and export controls, tariffs, and other trade barriers; weakness in the capital and credit markets and the availability of credit; significant decreases in purchasing power caused by inflation or otherwise; fluctuations in interest rates whether caused by changes in monetary policy, lack of supply, or other economic conditions; changing political conditions, including risk of rising protectionism and authoritarian regimes, restrictions on immigration, or impositions of new trade barriers, including additional economic sanctions or export controls (including those introduced due to the war in Ukraine); cyber risk, including information hacking, viruses, and malware; operating costs, availability and price of jet fuel, and general economic conditions affecting aircraft operations; customer restructurings or bankruptcies and decreases in the creditworthiness of customers; technological innovation resulting in older aircraft and engine models being retired or otherwise made obsolete; new-entrant manufacturers producing additional aircraft that compete with existing models; production delays and supply chain issues impacting new aircraft delivery schedules; aircraft groundings and other costs associated with airworthiness directives and service bulletins; safety, noise, and emission standards and regulations; and the availability of spare parts. A decline in demand for leased aircraft generally, or as a result of the factors described above, may result in decreases in rental rates and increases in lease defaults, and may delay or prevent the re-lease or sale of assets on favorable terms. Risks Related to Our Common Stock The market price of our common stock may decline due to the large number of shares of stock eligible for future sale. The market price of our common stock may decline as a result of sales of a large number of shares of common stock in the market in the future or the perception that such sales could occur. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also may make it more difficult for us to sell common stock in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate. Subject, in some cases, to compliance with our insider trading policy, minimum retained ownership requirements, transfer restrictions, and limitations applicable to affiliates under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, all of these shares are freely tradable. In addition, the holders of these shares have the benefit of registration rights agreements with us. Moreover, as holders of freely tradable common stock rather than Carlyle Holdings units, the Former Private Unitholders are able to more easily sell shares of common stock into the market (or donate shares of common stock to charities which in turn may sell these into the market) than was the case before the Conversion. For example, the Former Private Unitholders are not subject to restrictions that in most cases limited their ability to exchange Holdings Units for common units to prescribed quarterly exchange dates. This could result in the Former Private Unitholders disposing of their equity interests in us more quickly and/or at a higher volume than in the past, and the market price of our common stock could decline as a result. Subject to the restrictions described below, we may issue and sell in the future additional shares of common stock. The issuance of additional equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities would also result in dilution of our existing shareholders’ equity interest. The issuance of the additional shares of common stock, the sale of shares of common stock by our significant shareholders, and the vesting and sale of restricted stock units or the perception that such sales may occur could cause the market price of our common stock to decline. As of December 31, 2025 , our Chief Executive Officer held a total of 3.7 million unvested restricted stock units (inclusive of unvested dividend equivalent units that have been credited on such awards) in respect of awards that were granted to him outside of the Equity Incentive Plan in connection with his hiring. Under our Equity Incentive Plan, we had 11.3 million unvested restricted stock units outstanding as of December 31, 2025 . As of December 31, 2025 , the total number of shares of common stock available for grant under the amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan was 23.4 million and, following the grant of awards in February 2026, the total number of shares of common stock available for grant under the amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan was 17.6 million . A further increase in the number of shares available for grant under the Equity Incentive Plan wou ld require shareholder approval, and any such approval would result in more shares that may be delivered in settlement of vested restricted stock unit awards and that may ultimately be sold in the market, which could lead to a decline in the market price of our common stock. We have filed several registration statements and intend to file additional registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register shares of common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common stock issued or available for future grant under our amended and restated Equity Incentive Plan, 82 Table of Contents when applicable. Any such Form S-8 registration statement will automatically become effective upon filing. Accordingly, common stock registered under such registration statement will be available for sale in the open market. As restricted stock unit awards vest and shares of common stock are delivered to restricted stock unit holders, the market price of our common stock may decline due to dilution or if such holders elect to sell their shares of common stock. Morgan Stanley, our equity plan service provider, may, from time to time, act as a broker, dealer, or agent for, or otherwise facilitate sales in the open market through block transactions or otherwise of our common stock on behalf of, plan participants. The market price and trading volume of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment to decline. The market price of our shares may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our shares may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. You may be unable to resell your shares at or above your purchase price, if at all. Some of the factors that could negatively affect the price of our shares or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our shares include: variations in our quarterly operating results, which variations we expect will be substantial, or dividends; our policy of taking a long-term perspective on making investment, operational, and strategic decisions, which is expected to result in significant and unpredictable variations in our quarterly returns; our creditworthiness, results of operations, and financial condition; the credit ratings of the shares; the prevailing interest rates or rates of return being paid by other companies similar to us and the market for similar securities; failure to meet analysts’ earnings estimates; publication of research reports about us or the investment management industry or the failure of securities analysts to cover our shares; additions or departures of key management personnel; adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we may incur or securities we may issue in the future; actions by stockholders; changes in market valuations of similar companies; speculation in the press or investment community; changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations or differing interpretations thereof affecting our businesses or enforcement of these laws and regulations, or announcements relating to these matters; a lack of liquidity in the trading of our shares; adverse publicity about the investment management industry generally or individual scandals, specifically; a breach of our computer systems, software, or networks, or misappropriation of our proprietary information; and economic, financial, geopolitical, regulatory, or judicial events or conditions that affect us or the financial markets. Certain of our co-founders have the right to designate members of our Board of Directors. Pursuant to the stockholder agreements with certain of our co-founders, for so long as such co-founder and/or his “Stockholder Group” (as defined in the stockholder agreements) beneficially owns at least 5% of our issued and outstanding common stock, such co-founders will have the right to nominate one director to our Board of Directors. In addition, such co- founder will have the right to nominate a second director to our Board of Directors until the earlier of (x) such time as such co- founder and/or his Stockholder Group ceases to beneficially own at least 20 million shares of our common stock and (y) January 1, 2027. For so long as at least one co-founder is entitled to designate two directors to the Board of Directors, the co- founders then serving on our Board of Directors may (i) designate a co-founder to serve as chair or co-chair and (ii) designate a co-founder to serve on each of the compensation and nominating committees and any executive committee, subject to applicable law and listing standards. Accordingly, for such period of time, our co-founders will have significant influence over the composition of our Board of Directors and could prevent certain changes in the composition of our Board of Directors. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation does not limit the ability of our former general partner, co-founders, directors, officers, or stockholders to compete with us. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that none of our former general partner, co-founders, directors, officers, or stockholders will have any duty to refrain from engaging, directly or indirectly, in the same business activities or similar business activities or lines of business in which we operate. In the ordinary course of their business activities, these persons may engage in activities where their interests conflict with our interests or those of our other stockholders. These persons also may pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to the Company. In addition, these persons may have an interest in our pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, and other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance their investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to our common stockholders. 83 Table of Contents Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents could delay or prevent a change in control. Certain provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay, or prevent a merger or acquisition that a stockholder may consider favorable by, for example: • permitting our Board of Directors to issue one or more series of preferred stock; • providing for the loss of voting rights for the common stock; • requiring advance notice for stockholder proposals and nominations; • placing limitations on convening stockholder meetings; • prohibiting stockholder action by written consent unless such action is consented to by the Board of Directors;and • imposing super majority voting requirements for certain amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. These provisions also may discourage acquisition proposals or delay or prevent a change in control. The provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requiring exclusive venue in the Court of Chancery in the State of Delaware for certain types of lawsuits may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, and stockholders. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation requires, to the fullest extent permitted by law, that any claims, suits, actions, or proceedings arising out of or relating in any way to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation may only be brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, if such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction thereof, any other court in the State of Delaware with subject matter jurisdiction. This provision may have the effect of discouraging lawsuits against us and our directors, officers, and stockholders. If The Carlyle Group Inc. were deemed to be an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act, applicable restrictions could make it impractical for us to continue our business as contemplated and could have a material adverse effect on our business. An entity generally will be deemed to be an “investment company” for purposes of the Investment Company Act if: • it is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily, or proposes to engage primarily, in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities; or • absent an applicable exemption, it owns or proposes to acquire investment securities having a value exceeding 40% of the value of its total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. We believe that we are engaged primarily in the business of providing asset management services and not in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities. We hold ourselves out as an asset management firm and do not propose to engage primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting, or trading in securities. Accordingly, we do not believe that The Carlyle Group Inc. is an “orthodox” investment company as defined in section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act and described in the first bullet point above. Furthermore, The Carlyle Group Inc. does not have any material assets other than its interests in certain wholly owned subsidiaries, which in turn have no material assets other than certain interests in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. These wholly owned subsidiaries are the sole general partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships and are vested with all management and control over the Carlyle Holdings partnerships. We do not believe that the equity interests of The Carlyle Group Inc. in its wholly owned subsidiaries or the general partner interests of these wholly owned subsidiaries in the Carlyle Holdings partnerships are investment securities. Moreover, because we believe that the capital interests of the general partners of our funds in their respective funds are neither securities nor investment securities, we believe that less than 40% of The Carlyle Group Inc.’s total assets (exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis are composed of assets that could be considered investment securities. Accordingly, we do not believe that The Carlyle Group Inc. is an inadvertent investment company by virtue of the 40% test in section 3(a)(1)(C) of the Investment Company Act as described in the second bullet point above. In addition, we believe that The Carlyle Group Inc. is not an 84 Table of Contents investment company under section 3(b)(1) of the Investment Company Act because it is primarily engaged in a non-investment company business. The Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder contain detailed parameters for the organization and operation of investment companies. Among other things, the Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder limit or prohibit transactions with affiliates, impose limitations on the issuance of debt and equity securities, generally prohibit the issuance of options, and impose certain governance requirements. We intend to conduct our operations so that The Carlyle Group Inc. will not be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act. If anything were to happen that would cause The Carlyle Group Inc. to be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, requirements imposed by the Investment Company Act, including limitations on our capital structure, ability to transact business with affiliates (including us) and ability to compensate key employees, could make it impractical for us to continue our business as currently conducted, impair the agreements and arrangements between and among The Carlyle Group Inc. and our senior Carlyle professionals, and materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, we may be required to limit the amount of investments that we make as a principal or otherwise conduct our business in a manner that does not subject us to the registration and other requirements of the Investment Company Act. The consolidation of investment funds, holding companies, or operating businesses of our portfolio companies could make it more difficult to understand the operating performance of the Company and could create operational risks for the Company. Under applicable U.S. GAAP standards, we may be required to consolidate certain of our investment funds, holding companies, or operating businesses if we determine that these entities are VIEs and that we are the primary beneficiary of the VIE, as discussed in Note 2 , Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , to our consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The number of funds we are required to consolidate has been increasing as a result of the impacts of capital from our balance sheet invested in new products and our indirect interest in funds through our investment in Fortitude. Generally, the consolidation of our investment funds has a gross-up effect on our assets, liabilities and cash flows but has no net effect on the net income attributable to the Company beyond the capital contributed by us to the consolidated investment funds . The majority of the net economic ownership interests of these consolidated investment funds are reflected as non-controlling interests in consolidated entities in the consolidated financial statements. However, in certain of the consolidated investment funds, particularly those where we have elected to invest additional amounts or bridge investments in new investment areas, the non-controlling interests are less significant. Additionally, the consolidated investment funds are not the same entities in all periods presented. As a result, t he consolidation of such entities could make it difficult for an investor to understand our operating performance. In addition, as the number of funds we consolidate increases, our reporting processes may become more complex, which may lead to higher costs and introduce operational risk. Risks Related to Taxation Changes in relevant tax laws, regulations, or treaties or an adverse interpretation of these items by tax authorities could negatively impact our effective tax rate, tax liability, and/or the performance of certain funds should unexpected taxes be assessed to portfolio investments (companies) or fund income. Our effective tax rate and tax liability is based on the application of current income tax laws, regulations, and treaties. These laws, regulations, and treaties are complex, and the manner that they apply to us and our funds is sometimes open to interpretation. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, uncertain tax positions, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. Although management believes its application of current laws, regulations, and treaties to be correct and sustainable upon examination by the tax authorities, the tax authorities could challenge our interpretation, resulting in additional tax liability or adjustment to our income tax provision that could increase our effective tax rate. There may be changes in tax laws or interpretations of tax laws (possibly with retrospective effect) in jurisdictions in which we operate, are managed, are advised, are promoted, or invest. Such changes could materially increase the amount of taxes that we, our portfolio companies, our investors, or our employees and other key personnel are required to pay. This could significantly impact returns by materially and adversely affecting the value of our investments or the feasibility of making certain investments, require us to negatively revalue our deferred taxes, and/or materially increase our effective tax rate and tax liabilities. Changes to taxation treaties or interpretations of taxation treaties between one or more such jurisdictions and the countries through which we hold investments, or the introduction of, or change to, European Union (“EU”) directives may adversely affect our ability to efficiently realize and repatriate income and capital gains from the jurisdictions in which they 85 Table of Contents arise. These changes to tax laws , taxation treaties, and interpretations may require complex computations not previously required, significant judgments, and/or preparation of information not previously relevant or regularly produced, which may increase tax-related regulatory and compliance costs. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”) introduced, among other things, a 15% alternative minimum tax on the “adjusted financial statement income” of certain large corporations, which has required judgments in interpretation and complex computations and analysis to be performed that were not previously required in U.S. tax law. In addition, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA”) was enacted on July 4, 2025, and made permanent many provisions from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and amended or eliminated certain provisions from the IRA. Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, and other standard-setting bodies are expected to issue additional guidance relating to implementation of OBBBA , which may be applied or otherwise administered differently from our interpretations. It is unclear whether additional legislation will be enacted into law under the current administration or, if enacted, what form it would take, and it is also unclear whether there could be further regulatory or administrative action that could affect U.S. tax rules. State and local governments also may enact tax laws that fundamentally change state and local taxation, increase audit activity, or prompt more aggressive interpretations of existing laws and regulations. Any of these risks may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flow. Our workforce, including employees, key personnel, and service providers, has become increasingly geographically dispersed. This geographic dispersion may subject our entities to higher tax and compliance costs, including increased payroll taxes, social security contributions, and other employment-related obligations. It may also cause our entities to become subject to taxation in additional jurisdictions where they were not previously considered to have a taxable presence. If these incremental tax or compliance costs are passed on to employees or other personnel, or if we are required to implement more restrictive working arrangements to manage associated risks, our ability to attract, develop, and retain talent could be adversely affected. In addition, failure to properly manage these obligations could expose us to penalties, additional assessments, or other regulatory consequences. International tax developments also may significantly impact us. The OECD’s base erosion and profit shifting (“BEPS”) project is focused on a number of issues, including the shifting of profits between affiliated entities in different tax jurisdictions, interest deductibility, and eligibility for the benefits of double tax treaties. Several of the measures, including measures covering treaty abuse (including an anti-abuse “principal purpose” test), the deductibility of interest expense, local nexus requirements, transfer pricing, and hybrid mismatch arrangements are potentially relevant to some of our structures and could have an adverse tax impact on our funds, investors, and/or our portfolio companies, including by adversely impacting our ability to efficiently realize and repatriate income and capital gains from the jurisdictions in which they arise. Many individual jurisdictions have introduced domestic legislation implementing certain of the BEPS action points, but because timing of implementation and the specific measures adopted will vary among participating member countries, uncertainty remains regarding the impact of the BEPS proposals. Moreover, many of the jurisdictions in which we have made (or expect to make) investments have now ratified, accepted, and approved the OECD’s Multilateral Instrument that brings into effect a number of relevant changes to double tax treaty eligibility. While these changes continue to be introduced, there remains uncertainty as to whether and to what extent we may benefit from such treaties and whether our funds may look to their investors in order to derive tax treaty or other benefits. This position is likely to remain uncertain for a number of years. In addition, the EU has adopted (and subsequently extended) an Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (the “ATAD rules”), which directly implements some of the BEPS project action points within EU law and requires EU Member States to transpose the ATAD rules into their domestic laws. The ATAD rules, which include rules targeting reverse hybrids, and the domestic laws that implement them are extensive, complex, and could apply to a wide range of scenarios. While certain countries have issued guidance on the application of these rules, the impact of the ATAD rules and their application to our entities remains uncertain. These rules could have an adverse tax impact on our firm, funds, investors, and/or our portfolio companies. On January 17, 2023, the European Parliament approved a proposal for an anti-tax avoidance directive laying down rules to prevent the misuse of shell entities for tax purposes within the EU (the “Unshell Proposal,” also known as “ATAD III”). In a report from the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union dated June 18, 2025, it was noted that the original aims of the proposal for a council directive laying down rules to prevent the misuse of shell entities for tax purposes within the EU could be achieved through clarifications or amendments to existing hallmarks under DAC 6. Whether such clarifications or amendments to existing hallmarks under DAC 6 will be made, and if so, the details and timing of the implementation of such clarifications or amendments and their impact on our entities and the performance of certain funds remains uncertain. 86 Table of Contents A number of proposals from the European Commission have been issued or adopted that further enhance and move beyond the work on the BEPS project. First, a package of tax reforms was approved by the European Parliament on November 13, 2025,comprising the “Proposal for a Council Directive on Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation” (“BEFIT”) (which seeks to produce a comprehensive solution for business taxation in the EU). BEFIT aims to introduce a common set of rules for EU companies to calculate their taxable base while ensuring a more effective allocation of profits between EU countries. Following adoption by the European Council, the proposal is intended to come into force on July 1, 2028. BEFIT has the potential to alter taxing rights with the EU and may include substantive changes to applicable tax rules. Second, the European Council has agreed to implement changes to the procedures used across the European Union in respect of withholding taxes (known as “FASTER”). Specifically, the changes are aimed at simplifying the procedures for a refund or applying for relief at the source; however, the changes could have broader implications. These withholding tax changes, once implemented into domestic legislation, are expected to come into effect from January 1, 2030. The details and timing of the implementation of BEFIT (if adopted) and FASTER and the impact on our funds, or any entities in or through which our funds invest, is uncertain. The OECD also has issued proposals, commonly referred to as “BEPS 2.0,” which fundamentally change the international tax system. The proposals are based on two “pillars” involving the shifting of taxing rights to the jurisdiction of the consumer (“Pillar One”) and ensuring all companies pay a global minimum corporate tax (“Pillar Two”). Under Pillar One, multinational enterprises (“MNEs”) with an annual global turnover of at least EUR 20 billion will be subject to rules allocating a formulaic share of consolidated profits in excess of a 10% profit margin to the jurisdictions where their consumers or users are located (subject to threshold rules). MNEs carrying on specific low-risk activities are excluded, including “regulated financial services.” Pillar Two imposes a minimum effective tax rate of 15% on MNEs that have consolidated revenues of at least EUR 750 million in at least two out of the last four years. The OECD has released model rules and commentary for Pillar Two, including guidance on the treatment of taxes paid by U.S. companies on non-U.S. income under the U.S. Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income regime. The proposals are complex and subject to significant uncertainty, and consultation in respect of certain aspects of the rules is ongoing as we await further guidance from the OECD. On January 5, 2026, the OECD announced a “side-by-side” system under which U.S.-parented groups would be able to elect to be effectively exempt from certain of the Pillar Two rules, together with certain simplifications to the existing rules. The details of such amendments and the “side-by-side” system remain the subject of further discussions and clarifications from the OECD, and the implementation of such system by the OECD member countries remains uncertain. Pillar One and Pillar Two could impact the effective tax rates for our firm, funds, portfolio companies, and investors, including by way of higher levels of tax being imposed, possible denial of deductions, increased withholding taxes, and/or profits being allocated differently. It is likely that our entities also will be subject to significant additional compliance and/or reporting obligations. Any tax laws, regulations, or treaties newly enacted or enacted in the future also may cause us to revalue our deferred taxes and have a material change to our effective tax rate and tax liabilities, as a result. Moreover, the Netherlands continues to provide additional updates to its withholding tax on dividends. As of January 1, 2024, dividend distributions made by Dutch companies to “associated beneficiaries” established in blacklisted jurisdictions (or non-blacklisted jurisdictions, in the case of situations that are deemed to be “abusive”) may be subject to a conditional withholding tax. The applicable tax rate is linked to the highest corporate income tax in the relevant year (being 25.8% in 2025). We are monitoring the impact of these rules, which could result in additional withholding taxes being levied on our investment funds or on repatriation of income and gains generated. U.S. and foreign tax regulations could adversely affect our ability to raise funds from certain foreign investors and increase compliance costs. We must comply with complicated and expansive information tax reporting regimes in multiple jurisdictions, which require us to perform due diligence and to report information about certain account holders and investors, as well as potential withholding. Failure to comply with these requirements could result in increased administrative and compliance costs for our investment entities and, in some cases, could subject our investment entities to increased withholding taxes or monetary penalties. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. 87 Table of Contents ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY Risk Management and Strategy We regularly assess risks from cybersecurity threats, monitor our information systems for potential vulnerabilities, and test those systems pursuant to our cybersecurity policies, standards, processes, and practices, which are integrated into our overall risk management system. To protect our information systems from cybersecurity threats, we use various security tools that help us identify, protect against, detect, respond to, and recover from security incidents. These efforts are implemented by our Global Technology & Solutions (“GTS”) team in partnership with other stakeholders and are essential for our operations. Our systems, data, network, and infrastructure are monitored and administered by formal controls and risk management processes that log events and help protect the firm’s data. In addition, our business continuity plans are designed to allow critical business functions to continue in the event of an emergency. The GTS team works closely with our business segment teams to maintain operational resilience through business continuity planning and annual information technology disaster recovery and incident response plan testing. These efforts are underpinned by the implementation of security best practices, where possible, such as: • Multi-factor authentication for remote access, privileged access management for system administrators, application whitelisting, laptop encryption, mobile device management software, and advanced malware defenses on endpoints; • Incident preparedness and response planning and risk mitigation; • Independent and continuous security testing, assessment, and third-party risk management; • Regular security awareness training, including phishing simulations; • Restrictions on access to personal email accounts, cloud storage, social media, risk-based categories of websites, and USB storage devices; • Device and system access management policies and procedures that restrict access upon employee or contractor separation from the Company; and • Attestations by Carlyle personnel to abide by firm policies, such as our acceptable use policy, upon hire and annually. In addition, we partner with third parties to assess the effectiveness of our cybersecurity program, including audits and assessments performed under the direction of Carlyle’s Internal Audit team, which co-sources with third-party cybersecurity experts in conducting its reviews. GTS also administers the firm’s cyber third-party risk management program, which assesses external service providers before onboarding and provides ongoing monitoring in accordance with certain risk-based cybersecurity criteria. To our knowledge, cybersecurity threats, including as a result of any previous detected or undetected cybersecurity incidents, have not materially affected us, including our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition; however, we may learn new facts about these detected or undetected incidents and these facts may lead us to change this materiality assessment. The sophistication of cyber threats continues to increase and there can be no assurance that the various procedures and controls we utilize to mitigate these threats will be sufficient to prevent disruptions to our systems. Consequently, given that the magnitude of cybersecurity incidents or threats are difficult to predict, we are unable to determine at this time whether risks from cybersecurity threats are reasonably likely to materially affect us, including our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. For an additional description of cybersecurity risk and potential related impacts on us, see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Company—Operational risks (including those associated with our business model), system security risks, breaches of data protection, cyberattacks, or actions or failure to act by our employees or others with authorized access to our networks, including our ability to insure against such risks, may disrupt our businesses, result in losses, or limit our growth.” Governance Our Board of Directors oversees our enterprise risk management strategy, including our strategy on cybersecurity risks, directly and through its committees. In this respect, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Audit Committee”) oversees our risk management program, which focuses on the most significant risks we face in the short-, intermediate-, and long-term timeframe. Audit Committee meetings include discussions of specific risk areas throughout the 88 Table of Contents year, including, among others, those relating to cybersecurity, and reports from the Chief Audit Executive on our enterprise risk profile on an annual basis. In addition, our Chief Information Security Officer (“ CISO ”) leads our cybersecurity program, chairs our ISC, and provides cybersecurity status reporting to our Audit Committee at least annually. The ISC meets quarterly and ensures that cybersecurity initiatives are in alignment with Carlyle’s strategic priorities . We take a risk-based approach to cybersecurity and have implemented cybersecurity policies, standards, processes, and practices throughout our operations that are designed to address cybersecurity threats, events, and incidents. In particular, our cybersecurity program supports security governance, security awareness and training, security engineering and architecture, security risk management, vulnerability management, security monitoring, and incident response capabilities. In addition, our incident response plan contains escalation and reporting protocols, including reporting to the firm’s Disclosure Committee to consider materiality of cybersecurity incidents. Policies and procedures are in place to assist the firm’s Disclosure Committee with these materiality assessments and any resulting reporting requirements. Our CISO, in coordination with our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Information Officer, Chief Risk Officer, and Chief Audit Executive, among certain other senior executives, is responsible for leading the assessment and management of cybersecurity risks. The current CISO has over 20 years of experience in information security that includes key roles managing cybersecurity risk in both government and the private sector. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Our principal executive offices are located in leased office space at 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. We also lease the space for our other 26 offices . We do not own any real property. We consider these facilities to be suitable and adequate for the management and operation of our business. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In the ordinary course of business, the Company is a party to litigation, investigations, inquiries, employment-related matters, disputes and other potential claims. See Note 8 , Commitments and Contingencies , to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of certain of these matters. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not Applicable. 89 Table of Contents PART II. ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “CG.” The number of holders of record of our common stock as of February 24, 2026 was 5 . This does not include the number of stockholders that hold shares in “street name” through banks or broker-dealers. Dividend Policy Under our dividend policy for our common stock, we expect to pay our common stockholders an annualized dividend of $1.40 per share of common stock, equal to a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share of common stock. The declaration and payment of any dividends to holders of our common stock are subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors, which may change our dividend policy at any time or from time to time, and the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. There can be no assurance that dividends will be made as intended or at all or that any particular dividend policy will be maintained. Stock Performance Graph The following graph depicts the total return to holders of our common stock from the closing price on December 31, 2020, the last trading day of our 2020 fiscal year, through December 31, 2025 , the last trading day of our 2025 fiscal year, relative to the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Asset Managers index and the S&P MidCap 400 index. The graph assumes $100 invested on December 31, 2020 and dividends received reinvested in the security or index. The performance graph is not intended to be indicative of future performance. The performance graph shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that Section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. 90 Table of Contents Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities The following table sets forth repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2025 for the periods indicated. During the three months ended December 31, 2025 , 3.3 million shares were repurchased. In addition, 0.5 million shares were retired in connection with the net share settlement of equity-based awards, which are not included in the table below. Period (a) Total number of shares purchased (b) Average price paid per share (c) Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs (d) Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs (3) (Dollars in millions, except unit and per unit data) October 1, 2025 to October 31, 2025 (1) — $ — — $ 779.3 November 1, 2025 to November 30, 2025 (1)(2) 2,574,274 $ 52.55 2,574,274 $ 644.0 December 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025 (1)(2) 713,330 $ 55.69 713,330 $ 604.3 Total 3,287,604 3,287,604 (1) The Board of Directors reset the total repurchase authorization of our previously approved share repurchase program to $1.4 billion in shares of our common stock, effective as of February 6, 2024. Under the share repurchase program, shares of our common stock may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions, in privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans. The timing and actual number of shares of common stock repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including legal requirements and price, economic, and market conditions. In addition to the repurchase of common stock, the share repurchase program is used for the payment of tax withholding amounts upon net share settlement of equity-based awards granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan or otherwise based on the value of shares withheld that would have otherwise been issued to the award holder. The repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and does not have a specified expiration date. The Board of Directors reset the total repurchase authorization to $2.0 billion in shares of our common stock, effective as of February 26, 2026. (2) Reflects shares purchased in open market and brokered transactions, which were subsequently retired. (3) The remaining repurchase authorization was $165.7 million as of December 31, 2025 , when factoring in the net share settlement of equity-based awards. Sales of Unregistered Securities Pursuant to our amended agreement with NGP Management, we agreed to grant additional shares of common stock on February 1 in an amount based on total distributions received by the Company from NGP Management, in any case not to exceed $10.0 million per year. In the first quarter of 2025, we restructured the terms of our strategic investment in NGP and terminated the obligation to grant up to $10.0 million of Carlyle common shares to NGP annually following a final grant made with respect to 2030. In order to effectuate the amended NGP agreement, we entered into agreements with an affiliate of NGP Management on each of the dates below to deliver such shares as follows: 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Date of Agreement: February 1, 2020 89,820 — — — — — — February 1, 2021 87,419 87,418 — — — — — February 1, 2022 75,290 56,467 56,467 — — — — February 1, 2023 — 103,432 77,574 77,573 — — — February 1, 2024 — — 98,918 74,188 74,187 — — February 1, 2025 — — — 68,757 51,567 51,567 — February 1, 2026 — — — — 50,603 37,952 37,952 91 Table of Contents Such securities have been offered and sold in reliance on the exemption contained in Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by the issuer not involving a public offering. No general solicitation or underwriters were involved in such offer and sale. Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plans As permitted by our policies and procedures governing transactions in our securities by our directors, executive officers, and other employees, from time to time, some of these persons may establish plans or arrangements complying with Rule 10b5-1 under the Exchange Act, and similar plans and arrangements relating to our common stock. ITEM 6. [RESERVED] 92 Table of Contents ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Unless context suggests otherwise, references in this report to “Carlyle,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to The Carlyle Group Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion includes a comparison of our results for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 . For a discussion of our results for the year ended December 31, 2023 and a comparison of results for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 , see Part II, Item 7 “ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 , which specific discussion is incorporated herein by reference. Overview We are one of the world’s largest global investment firms and deploy private capital across our business. We conduct our operations through three reportable segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit, and Carlyle AlpInvest (formerly, Global Investment Solutions). • Global Private Equity — Our Global Private Equity segment advises our buyout, growth, real estate, and infrastructure & natural resources funds. The segment also includes the NGP Carry Funds advised by NGP. As of December 31, 2025 , our Global Private Equity segment had $163.5 billion in AUM and $101.4 billion in Fee-earning AUM. • Global Credit — Our Global Credit segment advises funds and vehicles that pursue investment strategies including insurance solutions, liquid credit, opportunistic credit, direct lending, asset-backed finance, aviation finance, infrastructure credit, cross-platform credit products, and global capital markets. As of December 31, 2025 , our Global Credit segment had $211.3 billion in AUM and $169.5 billion in Fee-earning AUM. • Carlyle AlpInvest — Our Carlyle AlpInvest segment advises global private equity programs that pursue secondary purchases and financing of existing portfolios, managed co-investment programs, and primary fund investments. As of December 31, 2025 , our Carlyle AlpInvest segment had $102.0 billion in AUM and $66.0 billion in Fee-earning AUM. We earn management fees pursuant to contractual arrangements with the investment funds that we manage and fees for transaction advisory and oversight services provided to portfolio companies of these funds. We also typically receive a performance fee from an investment fund, which may be either an incentive fee or a special residual allocation of income, which we refer to as a performance allocation, or carried interest, in the event that specified investment returns are achieved by the fund. Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”), we are required to consolidate some of the investment funds that we advise. However, for segment reporting purposes, we present revenues and expenses on a basis that deconsolidates these investment funds. Refer to Note 15 , Segment Reporting , to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on the differences between our financial results reported pursuant to U.S. GAAP and our financial results for segment reporting purposes. 93 Table of Contents Trends Affecting Our Business Equity markets closed out 2025 at or near new all-time highs, with major indices across the United States, Europe, and Japan setting new records in the fourth quarter. In Europe, the Euro Stoxx 50 rose 5% to end the year 18% higher, while the Nikkei rose 12% in the quarter to tally more than 26% for the year, firmly surpassing the 1989 peak that took nearly 35 years to regain. Returns in the United States decelerated from a strong third quarter with the S&P 500 gaining 2.3% for the fourth quarter and 16% for the year, marking the first time in 20 years that the S&P 500 was the worst performing major equity index. While continued economic growth and a resolution to the U.S. government shutdown helped support momentum across many sectors, concerns regarding an “AI bubble” intensified in November and dragged down many of the largest technology companies in the last two months of the year. The “Magnificent 7,” which generated annualized returns of 29% over the last five years and represented over half of the S&P 500’s gains from 2021 through their peak on October 29, 2025, have declined 7% from their top (as of February 24, 2026), offsetting gains in the rest of the index. By contrast, cyclical, value, and quality factors have strengthened since the start of the year; after a period of large-cap growth dominance, more reasonably priced value stocks have outperformed by over 600 basis points (“bps”) year-to-date in 2026. Public equity markets overall have been volatile in recent weeks; individual stocks have experienced large price swings in apparent response to headlines, new AI product offerings, and “viral” research reports. The software sector in particular has sold off on “AI disruption” fears and is down 33% year-to-date through February 24, 2026. Meanwhile, the public-private market valuation gap widened to its largest level in at least a decade in 2025, as buyout purchase multiples in the United States fell to 11.2x earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”), while public market valuations rose to 17.7x EBITDA, about half a turn below their 2021 peak of 18.2x EBITDA. Importantly, this valuation differential is not a reflection of underlying performance. Every year since 2019, including the twelve months ended September 30, 2025, which represents the most recent private markets data, the median buyout company has matched or beaten the revenue and EBITDA growth rates of the median company in the S&P 500. While headline U.S. GDP growth of 1.4% disappointed in the fourth quarter, real underlying demand as proxied by real final sales to private domestic purchasers (which strips out effects from trade, inventories, and government spending) was more resilient and expanded at a 2.4% annualized rate. Business spending remained a key contributing factor; our proprietary portfolio data indicate technology spending growth ended the year at a record 30% annualized rate. Consistent with prior quarters, much of this momentum remains concentrated in AI-related investment, particularly data centers, where hardware shipments are 7.5x higher than 2021 levels and capital expenditures continue to grow rapidly from a much larger base. While many observers focus on the economy’s “dependence” on the surge in AI-related capex, there are increasing signs that it is “crowding out” other forms of real estate development as data centers consume a larger share of the finite supply of investible capital. For other real estate sectors, capital is increasingly scarce, setting the stage for strategies focused elsewhere, such as our own real estate funds, to find greater opportunities to generate higher relative returns. Despite a constructive macro backdrop, our portfolio data suggest U.S. labor market momentum has softened further as the deceleration in payroll employment growth now appears to exceed what could be explained by the labor-supply shock from immigration enforcement. Some hiring weakness appears tied to corporate AI-integration efforts, as companies reassess workflows and pursue efficiencies to create financial capacity for incremental tech-enabled services spending. Recent statements from the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) , however, suggest that they are no longer as concerned with the labor market as they were in the fourth quarter of 2025, and feel comfortable with the current policy rate. Given the Federal Reserve’s historically dovish bias, continued cooling in employment and inflation indicators could increase the likelihood of additional easing down the road, despite core Personal Consumption Expenditures (“ PCE”) inflation that remains near the 3% levels that have main tained for the better part of two years. In Europe, there is a push for greater strategic autonomy that can only be achieved through a substantial increase in the domestic development and production of defense technologies and systems. Early signs of these efforts have started to become visible through improvement in broader economic data, supported by a notable pickup in factory output that seems to be tied to defense-related orders. Germany has also been part of that improvement, though energy-intensive industrial production remains roughly 20% below levels seen prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine , and momentum may hinge on how quickly Berlin can translate public investment plans into executed spending. Federal investment in Germany rose 17% in 2025 to €87 billion, though still came in nearly €29 billion below the original budget. In China, the key story continues to be the divergence between household consumption and industrial output: retail sales grew just 0.9% in December 2025 from a year earlier, the slowest pace since 2022, while industrial output grew by over 5%, contributing to a record $1.2 trillion trade surplus for the year. In India, our data suggest domestic demand grew at its fastest pace in over two years, supported by the Goods and Services Tax reform and low inflation that continues to support real household incomes. In Japan, recent moves in the yen and Japan 10-year government bond yields have fueled concerns of fiscal sustainability and the risk of a sovereign debt or currency crisis. However, these concerns overlook key attributes of the Japanese economy. Nominal per capita GDP has grown at an annualized rate of nearly 3% over the past five years, and public net debt looks manageable, particularly when viewed through the lens of substantial broader economy-wide savings. The normalization of rates appears to be more consistent with an 94 Table of Contents economy exiting its deflationary slump than of one in crisis. Japanese policymakers want this process to unfold gradually while preserving the benefits of a competitive exchange rate. Given recent election outcomes, Japan’s new leadership may also be able to move faster on its stated plans to increase defense spending and potentially ease restrictions on weapons sales to allies and partners. These shifts could create capital deployment opportunities surrounding increased defense expenditure. Additionally, tax reform could provide a near-term boost to growth by increasing disposable income for households and supporting domestic demand. Global mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) activity was very strong in 2025, with total volume of $5.1 trillion , a notable 44% increase over 2024 and the highest annual volume since 2021. The fourth quarter was the busiest of the year, with over $1.5 trillion in transactions, up 19% from the prior quarter, and 57% from a year ago. However, headline volumes were boosted by a shift toward larger deals. In 2025, average deal size was $125 million, a nearly 50% increase over 2024 and a 40% increase over the average size in the preceding five years (2020 through 2024). Buyout activity rose at a similar pace. Globally, financial sponsors announced $657 billion in buyout transactions in 2025, roughly 48% higher than 2024, with U.S.-target deals accounting for nearly 60% of global volume amid a surge in large transactions. In the fourth quarter, general partners announced $155 billion in global leveraged buyouts, nearly 50% higher than a year earlier, though underlying deal counts remained subdued at 420 deals, and the top 10 deals represented 53% of quarterly volume. Despite blockbuster deal volumes, buyout exits remained slow. Aggregate exit volumes of $116 billion in the fourth quarter of 2025 were roughly flat to the third quarter and were 18% lower than the fourth quarter of 2024; only 410 companies were fully divested globally, the lowest quarterly exit count since the fourth quarter of 2022. However, the initial public offering (“IPO”) market gained momentum throughout the year. In the fourth quarter, 21 U.S. exchange-listed IPOs raised $12.9 billion, a pullback in comparison to a very strong third quarter but still the second-best quarter by dollar amount since the fourth quarter of 2021. Activity remained concentrated in certain sectors: software and pharma/healthcare accounted for nearly 60% of deals and roughly 80% of proceeds. Notably, Medline alone represented 55% of total proceeds in the fourth quarter. In total, there were 93 U.S.-exchange listed IPOs over full-year 2025, with proceeds totaling $43.4 billion, an increase of 21% and 84% in transaction and volume terms, respectively, over 2024. Credit markets remained resilient in 2025, with demand supported by record fundraising in the CLO market, and an uptick in new supply from robust M&A activity, dividend recaps, and refinancing. While U.S. institutional loan activity fell in the fourth quarter, 2025 was still the second-busiest year on record with total activity over $1 trillion. European leveraged loan volume increased 21% over 2024, driven by a wave of repricing on the back of more favorable financing conditions. Spreads continued to compress, with direct lending deals pricing at 510bps and 521bps in the United States and Europe, respectively, and syndicated markets pricing well below 400bps in both regions. Risks appear to be muted, as defaults plus distressed exchanges in the leveraged loan market fell by more than a percentage point over the fourth quarter to end the year at just a 3.35% rate; private credit defaults remained below 2% as of the third quarter of 2025 (the latest quarter for which data are available). Our carry fund portfolio appreciated 8% during 2025. Within our Global Private Equity segment, our corporate private equity funds appreciated 7% , with particular strength in our latest vintage U.S. buyout and Japan buyout funds, which appreciated 17% and 33% , respectively, during the year, and our latest Europe technology fund, which appreciated 20% during the year. As a result, the net accrued performance revenues in our corporate private equity strategy increased. Our infrastructure and natural resources funds appreciated 17% , and our real estate funds appreciated 3% . Our Global Credit carry funds (which represent approximately 11% of the total Global Credit remaining fair value as of December 31, 2025) appreciated 16% in 2025 and carry funds in our Carlyle AlpInvest segment appreciated 6% . In contrast to the muted transaction volumes in the broader market, activity across our platform in 2025 picked up significantly relative to 2024. We generated $34.1 billion in realized proceeds from our carry funds in 2025, an increase of 19% from the prior year . We also continued to successfully execute public offerings during the year, including the IPO of Medline, which was the largest public offering of 2025. We deployed $54.5 billion across our platform during 2025, a more than 25% increase over 2024, which included $10.4 billion and $14.2 billion in invested capital in our Global Private Equity and Carlyle AlpInvest segments, respectively. In our Global Credit segment, deployment of $29.9 billion in 2025 included the closing of nine new CLOs, and gross originations across our platform including $5.1 billion in our direct lending strategy, which had its highest quarter of originations in the fourth quarter of 2025. In connection with the increase in deal activity, our net transaction and portfolio advisory fees of $206.0 million for the year increased 35 % from $152.5 million in 2024. We had $53.7 billion in capital inflows in 2025, an increase of 32% from 2024. Inflows during the year included over $ 7 billion in our evergreen wealth products, contributing to a near doubling of assets under management year-over-year in this area of strategic focus. We also completed fundraising on our largest secondaries fund in Carlyle AlpInvest during 2025, which reflects the demand for secondary solutions as investors seek liquidity and portfolio optimization strategies. With $88 billion of 95 Table of Contents available capital across our three business segments, we are well-positioned to deploy capital across our global investment platform. Notable Developments Dividends In February 2026, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share to common stockholders of record at the close of business on February 16, 2026 , payable on February 20, 2026 . Senior Note Issuance In September 2025, we issued $800.0 million of 5.050% senior notes due 2035. For further information, see Note 6 , Borrowings , to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Share Repurchase Program Our Board of Directors reset the total repurchase authorization to $2.0 billion in shares of our common stock, effective as of February 26, 2026. Under the share repurchase program, shares of our common stock may be repurchased from time to time in open market transactions, in privately negotiated transactions, or otherwise, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans. The timing and actual number of shares of common stock repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including legal requirements and price, economic, and market conditions. In addition to the repurchase of common stock, the share repurchase program is used for the payment of tax withholding amounts upon net share settlement of equity-based awards granted pursuant to our Equity Incentive Plan or otherwise based on the value of shares withheld that would have otherwise been issued to the award holder. The repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at any time and does not have a specified expiration dat e . Key Financial Measures Our key financial measures and operating metrics are discussed in the following pages. Additional information regarding U.S. GAAP measures and our other significant accounting policies can be found in Note 2 , Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Revenues Revenues primarily consist of Fund management fees , Incentive fees , Investment income (including Performance allocations , realized and unrealized gains of our investments in our funds, and other principal investments), as well as Interest and other income . Fund management fees . Fund management fees include management fees and transaction and portfolio advisory fees. We earn management fees for advisory services we provide to funds in which we hold a general partner interest or to funds or certain portfolio companies with which we have an investment advisory or investment management agreement. These fees are largely from either traditional closed-end, long-dated funds, which are highly predictable and stable, or Perpetual Capital products as defined below. Management fees also include catch-up management fees, which are episodic in nature and represent management fees charged to fund investors in subsequent closings of a fund which apply to the time period between the fee initiation date and the subsequent closing date. We also earn management fees on our CLOs and other structured products. Transaction and portfolio advisory fees generally include capital markets fees generated by Carlyle Global Capital Markets in connection with activities related to the underwriting, issuance and placement of debt and equity securities, and loan syndication for our portfolio companies and third-party clients, which are generally not subject to rebate offsets as described below with respect to our most recent vintages (but are subject to the rebate offsets set forth below for older funds). Underwriting fees include gains, losses, and fees arising from securities offerings in which we participate in the underwriter syndicate. Transaction and portfolio advisory fees also include fees we receive for the transaction and portfolio advisory services we provide to our portfolio companies. When covered by separate contractual agreements, we recognize transaction and portfolio advisory fees for these services when the performance obligation has been satisfied and collection is reasonably 96 Table of Contents assured. We are generally required to offset our fund management fees by the transaction and advisory fees earned, which we refer to as “rebate offsets.” The recognition of portfolio advisory fees, transactions fees, and capital markets fees can be volatile as they are primarily generated by investment activity within our funds, and therefore are impacted by our investment pace or other capital transactions at our portfolio companies. Incentive fees . Incentive fees consist of performance-based incentive arrangements pursuant to management contract s when the return on assets under management exceeds certain benchmark returns or other performance targets. In such arrangements, incentive fees are recognized when the performance benchmark has been achieved. Investment income (loss) . Investment income (loss) consists of our performance allocations as well as the realized and unrealized gains and losses resulting from our equity method investments and other principal investments. Performance allocations consist principally of the performance-based capital allocation from fund limited partners to us, commonly referred to as carried interest, from certain of our investment funds, which we refer to as the “carry funds.” Carried interest revenue is recognized by Carlyle upon appreciation of the valuation of our funds’ investments above certain return hurdles as set forth in each respective partnership agreement and is based on the amount that would be due to us pursuant to the fund partnership agreement at each period end as if the funds were liquidated at such date. Accordingly, the amount of carried interest recognized as performance allocations reflects our share of the fair value gains and losses of the associated funds’ underlying investments measured at their then-current fair values relative to the fair values as of the end of the prior period. As a result, the performance allocations earned in an applicable reporting period are not indicative of any future period, as fair values are based on conditions prevalent as of the reporting date. Refer to “—Trends Affecting Our Business” for further discussion. For any given period, performance allocations revenue on our statement of operations may include reversals of previously recognized performance allocations due to a decrease in the value of a particular fund that results in a decrease of cumulative performance allocations earned to date. Since fund return hurdles are cumulative, previously recognized performance allocations also may be reversed in a period of appreciation that is lower than the particular fund’s hurdle rate. Additionally, unrealized performance allocations reverse when performance allocations are realized, and unrealized performance allocations can be negative if the amount of realized performance allocations exceed total performance allocations generated in the period. The timing and receipt of realized performance allocations varies with the lifecycle of our carry funds and there is often a difference between the time we start accruing performance allocations and realization. The timing of performance allocation realizations from our Carlyle AlpInvest, Carlyle Aviation, and Abingworth funds is typically later than in our other carry funds based on the terms of such arrangements. Under our arrangements with the historical owners and management teams of AlpInvest and Abingworth, the amount of carried interest to which we are entitled varies. In some cases, we are entitled to 15% of the carried interest in respect of commitments from the historical owners of AlpInvest for the period between 2011 and 2020. In certain instances, carried interest associated with the AlpInvest fund vehicles is subject to entity level income taxes in the Netherlands. Additionally, in connection with the acquisition of Abingworth, we are entitled to 15% of carried interest generated from certain Abingworth funds. Realized carried interest may be clawed back or given back to the fund if the fund’s investment values decline below certain return hurdles, which vary from fund to fund. This amount is known as the “giveback obligation.” In all cases, each investment fund is considered separately in evaluating carried interest and potential giveback obligations. See Note 8 , Commitments and Contingencies , to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10- K for additional information. Accrued performance allocations and accrued giveback obligations at a point in time assume a hypothetical liquidation of the funds’ investments at their then current fair values. Each investment fund is considered separately in evaluating carried interest and potential giveback obligations. These assets and liabilities will continue to fluctuate in accordance with the fair values of the funds’ investments until they are realized. The Company uses “net accrued performance revenues” to refer to the aggregation of the accrued performance allocations net of (i) accrued giveback obligations, (ii) accrued performance allocations related compensation, (iii) performance allocations related tax obligations, and (iv) accrued performance allocations attributable to non-controlling interests. Net accrued performance revenues exclude any net accrued performance allocations and incentive fees that have been realized but will be collected in subsequent periods, as well as net accrued performance revenues which are presented as fee related performance revenues when realized in our non-GAAP financial measures. Realized performance allocation-related compensation that has not yet been paid is also excluded from our net accrued performance allocations. 97 Table of Contents In addition, realized performance allocations may be reversed in future periods to the extent that such amounts become subject to a giveback obligation. The aggregate amount of giveback obligations realized since Carlyle’s inception totaled $257.0 million , $175.6 million of which was related to various Legacy Energy Funds. Given that current and former senior Carlyle professionals and other limited partners of the Carlyle Holdings partnerships are responsible for paying the majority of the realized giveback obligation, only $87.1 million of the $257.0 million aggregate giveback obligation realized since inception was attributable to Carlyle. The realization of giveback obligations for the Company’s portion of such obligations reduces Distributable Earnings in the period realized. Further, each individual who holds equity interests in carried interest generated by our funds and is a recipient of realized carried interest typically signs a guarantee agreement or partnership agreement that personally obligates such person to return his/her pro rata share of any amounts of realized carried interest previously distributed that are later clawed back. Accordingly, carried interest as performance allocation compensation is subject to return to the Company in the event a giveback obligation is funded. Generally, the actual giveback liability, if any, does not become due until the end of a fund’s life. In addition, in our discussion of our non-GAAP results, we use the term “realized net performance revenues” to refer to realized performance allocations and incentive fees from our funds, net of the portion allocated to our investment professionals, and other employees and certain tax expenses associated with carried interest attributable to certain partners and employees, which are reflected as realized performance allocations and incentive fees related compensation expense. See “— Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “—Segment Analysis” for the amount of realized net performance revenues recognized each period and related discussion. Investment income also represents the realized and unrealized gains and losses on our principal investments, including our investments in Carlyle funds that are not consolidated, and our strategic investments in NGP as described below. Realized principal investment income (loss) is recorded when we redeem all or a portion of our investment or when we receive or are due cash income, such as dividends or distributions. A realized principal investment loss is also recorded when an investment is deemed to be permanently impaired or worthless. Unrealized principal investment income (loss) results from changes in the fair value of the underlying investment, as well as the reversal of previously recognized unrealized gains (losses) at the time an investment is realized. We account for our investments in NGP under the equity method of accounting. Our investments in NGP include the equity interests in NGP Management and the general partners of certain carry funds advised by NGP. Following the restructuring of the terms of our strategic investment in NGP in March 2025 (the “Restructuring”), our equity interests in NGP Management entitle us to an allocation of income equal to 55.0% of the management fee related revenues earned by NGP Management for existing funds, and up to 55.0% for all NGP funds that held an initial closing after December 31, 2024, including all management fees being retained by NGP for the years 2025 through 2028 on such future NGP funds. Our investment in the general partners of the NGP Carry Funds entitle us to up to 47.5% of the performance allocations received from NGP fund general partners. For further information regarding our strategic investments in NGP and the Restructuring, refer to Note 4 , Investments , to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We record investment income (loss) for our equity income allocation from NGP management fee related revenues and our share of any allocated expenses from NGP Management, as well as expenses associated with the compensatory elements of the strategic investment and any impairment charges. We also record our equity income allocation from NGP performance allocations in principal investment income (loss) from equity method investments rather than performance allocations in our consolidated statements of operations. We do not control or manage NGP. Moreover, we do not operate NGP’s business, have representation on NGP’s board or serve as an investment advisor to any investment fund sponsored by NGP, nor do we direct the operations of any of NGP’s portfolio companies. While we have consent rights over certain major actions by NGP outside of the ordinary course of NGP’s business (including, for example, consent rights over items such as amendments to the organizational documents of the entity in which we are invested, changes to the management fee streams earned by NGP under its fund agreements, or the incurrence of certain debt by NGP and other similar items), we have no voting rights or consent rights on any NGP investment committee that selects investments to be made by NGP funds. Interest and other income . Interest and other income primarily represents reimbursement of certain costs incurred on behalf of our funds, as well as interest income that we earn such as from our cash and money market accounts and other investments, including CLO senior and subordinated notes. Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds . Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds primarily represents the interest earned on assets of consolidated CLOs. Net investment income of Consolidated Funds . Net investment income of Consolidated Funds generally measures the change in the difference in fair value between the assets and the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds. Income (loss) indicates 98 Table of Contents that the fair value of the assets of the Consolidated Funds appreciated more (less), or depreciated less (more), than the fair value of the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds. Income or loss is not necessarily indicative of the investment performance of the Consolidated Funds and does not impact the management or incentive fees received by Carlyle for its management of the Consolidated Funds. The portion of the net investment income (losses) of Consolidated Funds attributable to the limited partner investors is allocated to non-controlling interests. Therefore, income or loss is not expected to have a material impact on the revenues or profitability of the Company beyond the Company’s capital invested in the Consolidated Funds . Moreover, although the assets of the Consolidated Funds are consolidated onto our balance sheet pursuant to U.S. GAAP, ultimately we do not have recourse to such assets and such liabilities are generally non-recourse to us. Therefore, income or loss from the Consolidated Funds generally does not impact the assets available to our common stockholders. Expenses Compensation and benefits . Compensation includes salaries, bonuses, equity-based compensation, and performance payment arrangements. Bonuses are accrued over the service period to which they relate. We recognize as compensation expense the portion of performance allocations and incentive fees that are due to our employees, senior Carlyle professionals, advisors, and operating executives in a manner consistent with how we recognize the performance allocations and incentive fee revenue. These amounts are accounted for as compensation expense in conjunction with the related performance allocations and incentive fee revenue and, until paid, are recognized as a component of the accrued compensation and benefits liability. Compensation in respect of performance allocations and incentive fees is paid when the related performance allocations and incentive fees are realized, and not when such performance allocations and incentive fees are accrued. The funds do not have a uniform allocation of performance allocations and incentive fees to our employees, senior Carlyle professionals, advisors, and operating executives. However, we generally allocate a range of 60% to 70% of performance allocations and incentive fees to our employees. In addition, we have implemented various equity-based compensation arrangements that require senior Carlyle professionals and other employees to provide services over a service period of generally one year to four years in order to vest in the applicable equity interests, which under U.S. GAAP will result in compensation charges over current and future periods. In certain of our equity-based compensation arrangements, vesting is based on the achievement of certain performance targets or market conditions. See Note 14 , Equity-Based Compensation , to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. Compensation charges associated with all equity-based compensation grants are excluded from Fee Related Earnings and Distributable Earnings. We may hire additional individuals and overall compensation levels may correspondingly increase, which could result in an increase in compensation and benefits expense. As a result of prior acquisitions, we have charges associated with contingent consideration taking the form of earn-outs and profit participation, some of which are reflected as compensation expense. General, administrative and other expenses . General, administrative and other expenses include occupancy and equipment expenses and other expenses, which consist principally of professional fees, including those related to our global regulatory compliance program, external costs of fundraising, travel and related expenses, communications and information services, depreciation and amortization (including intangible asset amortization and impairment), bad debt expense, and foreign currency transactions. We expect that general, administrative and other expenses will vary due to infrequently occurring or unusual items, such as impairment of intangible assets or lease right-of-use assets and expenses or insurance recoveries associated with litigation and contingencies. Also, in periods of significant fundraising, to the extent that we use third parties to assist in our fundraising efforts, our general, administrative and other expenses may increase accordingly. Similarly, our general, administrative and other expenses may increase as a result of professional and other fees incurred as part of due diligence related to strategic acquisitions and new product development. Additionally, we anticipate that general, administrative and other expenses will fluctuate from period to period due to the impact of foreign exchange transactions. Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds . Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds consist primarily of interest expense related primarily to loans of consolidated CLOs, professional fees and other third-party expenses. Income taxes. Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method of accounting. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, using currently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period in which the change is enacted. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. 99 Table of Contents Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Entities. Non-controlling interests in consolidated entities represent the component of equity in consolidated entities not held by us. These interests are adjusted for general partner allocations. Earnings Per Common Share. We compute earnings per common share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share . Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the common shares of the Company by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the assumed conversion of all dilutive securities. See Note 12 , Earnings Per Common Share , to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. Non-GAAP Financial Measures Distributable Earnings. Distributable Earnings, or “DE,” is a key performance benchmark used in our industry and is evaluated regularly in making resource deployment and compensation decisions, and in assessing the performance of our three segments. We also use DE in our budgeting, forecasting, and the overall management of our segments. We believe that reporting DE is helpful to understanding our business and that investors should review the same supplemental financial measure that management uses to analyze our segment performance. DE is intended to show the amount of net realized earnings without the effects of consolidation of the Consolidated Funds. DE is derived from our segment reported results and is an additional measure to assess performance. Distributable Earnings differs from income (loss) before provision for income taxes computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP in that it includes certain tax expenses associated with certain foreign performance revenues (composed of performance allocations and incentive fees), and does not include unrealized performance allocations and related compensation expense, unrealized principal investment income, equity-based compensation expense, net income (loss) attributable to non-Carlyle interest in consolidated entities, or charges (credits) related to Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items that affect period-to-period comparability and are not reflective of the Company’s operational performance. Charges (credits) related to Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items include: charges associated with the Conversion, charges associated with acquisitions, dispositions, or strategic investments, changes in the tax receivable agreement liability, amortization and any impairment charges associated with acquired intangible assets, transaction costs associated with acquisitions and dispositions, charges associated with earn-outs and contingent consideration including gains and losses associated with the estimated fair value of contingent consideration issued in conjunction with acquisitions or strategic investments, impairment charges associated with lease right-of-use assets, gains and losses from the retirement of debt, charges associated with contract terminations and employee severance, and non-recurring items that affect period-to-period comparability and are not reflective of the Company’s operating performance. We believe the inclusion or exclusion of these items provides investors with a meaningful indication of our core operating performance. This measure supplements and should be considered in addition to and not in lieu of the results of operations discussed further under “—Consolidated Results of Operations” prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Fee Related Earnings. Fee Related Earnings, or “FRE,” is a component of DE and is used to assess the ability of the business to cover base compensation and operating expenses from total fee revenues. FRE adjusts DE to exclude net realized performance revenues, realized principal investment income from investments in Carlyle funds, and net interest (interest income less interest expense). Fee Related Earnings includes fee related performance revenues and related compensation expense. Fee related performance revenues represent the realized portion of performance revenues that are measured and received on a recurring basis, are not dependent on realization events, and which have no risk of giveback. Operating Metrics We monitor certain operating metrics that are common to the asset management industry. Fee-earning Assets under Management. Fee-earning assets under management or Fee-earning AUM refers to the assets we manage or advise from which we derive recurring fund management fees. Our Fee-earning AUM is generally based on one of the following, once fees have been activated : (a) the amount of limited partner capital commitments, generally for carry funds where the original investment period has not expired and for AlpInvest carry funds during the commitment fee period (see “Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period); (b) the remaining amount of limited partner invested capital at cost, generally for carry funds and certain co- investment vehicles where the original investment period has expired (see “Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period); 100 Table of Contents (c) the amount of aggregate fee-earning collateral balance at par of our CLOs and other securitization vehicles, as defined in the fund indentures (pre-2020 CLO vintages are generally exclusive of equities and defaulted positions) as of the quarterly cut-off date; (d) the external investor portion of the net asset value of certain carry funds and evergreen products (see “Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value” in the table below for the amount of this component at each period); (e) the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets invested under the strategic advisory services agreement (see “Fee-earning AUM based on fair value and other” in the table below); (f) the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage) of certain cross-platform credit and direct lending products , excluding cash and cash equivalents for one of our business development companies (included in “Fee- earning AUM based on fair value and other” in the table below); and (g) the lower of cost or fair value of invested capital, generally for AlpInvest carry funds where the commitment fee period has expired and certain carry funds where the investment period has expired, (included in “Fee-earning AUM based on fair value and other” in the table below). The chart below presents Fee-earning AUM by segment at each period, in billions. The table below details Fee-earning AUM by its respective components at each period. As of December 31, 2025 2024 Consolidated Results (Dollars in millions) Components of Fee-earning AUM Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments $ 71,611 $ 58,885 Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital 80,814 81,826 Fee-earning AUM based on collateral balances, at par 44,455 45,890 Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value 30,151 23,369 Fee-earning AUM based on fair value and other 109,747 94,388 Balance, End of Period (1) $ 336,778 $ 304,358 (1) Ending balances as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 exclude $16.8 billion and $22.8 billion , respectively, of pending Fee-earning AUM for which fees have not yet been activated. 101 Table of Contents The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Fee-earning AUM. Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 Consolidated Results (Dollars in millions) Fee-earning AUM Rollforward Balance, Beginning of Period $ 304,358 $ 307,418 Inflows (1) 55,584 32,971 Outflows (including realizations) (2) (29,787) (31,289) Market Activity & Other (3) 1,845 (1,856) Foreign Exchange (4) 4,778 (2,886) Balance, End of Period $ 336,778 $ 304,358 (1) Inflows represents limited partner capital raised by our carry funds or separately managed accounts for which management fees based on commitments were activated during the period, the fee-earning commitments invested in vehicles for which management fees are based on invested capital, the fee-earning collateral balance of new CLO issuances, reinsurance and other transactions at Fortitude, as well as gross subscriptions in vehicles for which management fees are based on net asset value. Inflows exclude fundraising amounts during the period for which fees have not yet been activated, which are referenced as Pending Fee-earning AUM. (2) Outflows represents the impact of realizations from vehicles with management fees based on remaining invested capital at cost or fair value, changes in basis for funds where the investment period, weighted-average investment period or commitment fee period has expired during the period, reductions for funds that are no longer calling for fees, gross redemptions in our open-end funds, and outflows from our liquid credit products. Distributions for funds earning management fees based on commitments during the period do not affect Fee-earning AUM. (3) Market Activity & Other represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value and net asset value, activity of funds with fees based on gross asset value, and changes in the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement. (4) Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end. Refer to “—Segment Analysis” for a detailed discussion by segment of the activity affecting Fee-earning AUM for each of the periods presented by segment. Assets under Management. Assets under management or “AUM” refers to the assets we manage or advise. Our AUM generally equals the sum of the following : (a) the aggregate fair value of our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those funds and vehicles (including Carlyle commitments to those funds and vehicles and those of senior Carlyle professionals and employees) pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those funds and vehicles; (b) the amount of aggregate collateral balance and principal cash at par or aggregate principal amount of the notes of our CLOs and other structured products (inclusive of all positions); (c) the net asset value of certain carry funds and evergreen products; (d) the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets invested under the strategic advisory services agreement; and (e) the gross assets (including assets acquired with leverage) of certain cross-platform credit and direct lending products, plus the capital that Carlyle is entitled to call from investors in those vehicles pursuant to the terms of their capital commitments to those vehicles. 102 Table of Contents The chart below presents Total AUM by segment at each period, in billions. We include in our calculation of AUM and Fee-earning AUM the NGP Energy Funds that are advised by NGP. Our calculation of AUM also includes third-party capital raised for the investment in Fortitude through a Carlyle-affiliated investment fund and from strategic investors who directly invest in Fortitude alongside the fund. The AUM and Fee-earning AUM related to the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude are inclusive of the net asset value of investments in Carlyle products. These amounts are also reflected in the AUM and Fee-earning AUM of the strategy in which they are invested. For most of our Global Private Equity and Carlyle AlpInvest carry funds, total AUM includes the fair value of the capital invested, whereas Fee-earning AUM includes the amount of capital commitments or the remaining amount of invested capital, depending on whether the original investment period for the fund has expired. As such, Fee-earning AUM may be greater than total AUM when the aggregate fair value of the remaining investments is less than the cost of those investments. Our calculations of AUM and Fee-earning AUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers. As a result, these measures may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers. In addition, our calculation of AUM (but not Fee-earning AUM) includes uncalled commitments to, and the fair value of invested capital in, our investment funds from Carlyle and our personnel, regardless of whether such commitments or invested capital are subject to management fees or performance allocations. Our calculations of AUM or Fee-earning AUM are not based on any definition of AUM or Fee-earning AUM that is set forth in the agreements governing the investment funds that we manage or advise. We generally use Fee-earning AUM as a metric to measure changes in the assets from which we earn recurring management fees. Total AUM tends to be a better measure of our investment and fundraising performance as it reflects investments at fair value plus available capital. 103 Table of Contents The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Total AUM. Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 (Dollars in millions) Consolidated Results Total AUM Rollforward Balance, Beginning of Period $ 441,020 $ 425,994 Inflows (1) 53,692 40,781 Outflows (including realizations) (2) (43,280) (36,575) Market Activity & Other (3) 18,046 15,220 Foreign Exchange (4) 7,389 (4,400) Balance, End of Period $ 476,867 $ 441,020 (1) Inflows generally reflects the impact of gross fundraising, reinsurance and other transactions at Fortitude, and corporate acquisitions during the period, if any. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate. (2) Outflows includes distributions net of recallable or recyclable amounts in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, gross redemptions in our open-end products, outflows from our liquid credit products, and the expiration of available capital. (3) Market Activity & Other generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds and related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, as well as the net impact of fees, expenses and non-investment income, change in gross asset value for our business development companies, changes in the fair value of Fortitude’s general account assets covered by the strategic advisory services agreement, and other changes in AUM. (4) Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end. Please refer to “—Segment Analysis” for a detailed discussion by segment of the activity affecting Total AUM for each of the periods presented. Available Capital. “Available Capital” refers to the amount of capital commitments available to be called for investments, which may be reduced for equity invested that is funded via a fund credit facility and expected to be called from investors at a later date, plus any additional assets/liabilities at the fund level other than active investments. Amounts previously called may be added back to available capital following certain distributions. “Expired Available Capital” occurs when a fund has passed the investment and follow-on periods and can no longer invest capital into new or existing deals. Any remaining Available Capital, typically a result of either recycled distributions or specific reserves established for the follow-on period that are not drawn, can only be called for fees and expenses and is therefore removed from the Total AUM calculation. Perpetual Capital . “Perpetual Capital” refers to the assets we manage or advise which have an indefinite term and for which there is no immediate requirement to return capital to investors upon the realization of investments made with such capital, except as required by applicable law. Perpetual Capital may be materially reduced or terminated under certain conditions, including reductions from changes in valuations and payments to investors, including through elections by investors to redeem their investments, dividend payments, and other payment obligations, as well as the termination of or failure to renew the respective investment advisory agreements. Perpetual Capital includes: (a) assets managed under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, (b) our Core Plus real estate fund, (c) our business development companies and certain other direct lending products, (d) Carlyle Tactical Private Credit Fund (“CTAC”), (e) our closed-end tender offer Carlyle AlpInvest Private Markets (“CAPM”) and Carlyle AlpInvest Private Markets Secondaries (“CAPS”) funds, and (f) certain other structured credit products. As of December 31, 2025 , our total AUM and Fee-earning AUM included $115.4 billion and $110.9 billion , respectively, of Perpetual Capital. Our Perpetual Capital total AUM and Fee-earning AUM, exclusive of assets managed under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude, was $35.0 billion and $30.5 billion , respectively, as of December 31, 2025 . Performance Fee Eligible AUM. “Performance Fee Eligible AUM” represents the AUM of funds for which we are entitled to receive performance allocations, inclusive of the fair value of investments in those funds (which we refer to as “Performance Fee Eligible Fair Value”) and their Available Capital. Performance Fee Eligible Fair Value is “Performance Fee- Generating” when the associated fund has achieved the specified investment returns required under the terms of the fund’s agreement and is accruing performance revenue as of the quarter-end reporting date. Funds whose performance allocations are 104 Table of Contents treated as fee related performance revenues are excluded from these metrics. As of December 31, 2025 , our total AUM included $235.5 billion of Performance Fee Eligible AUM. Consolidation of Certain Carlyle Funds The Company consolidates all entities that it controls either through a majority voting interest or as the primary beneficiary of variable interest entities. The entities we consolidate are referred to collectively as the Consolidated Funds in our consolidated financial statements. The assets and liabilities of the Consolidated Funds are generally held within separate legal entities and, as a result, the assets of the Consolidated Funds are not available to support our operating activities, and similarly, the liabilities of the Consolidated Funds are non-recourse to us. As of December 31, 2025 , our Consolidated Funds represent approximately 4% of our AUM; 2% of our management fees; and 4% of our total investment income or loss on an unconsolidated basis for the year ended December 31, 2025 . We are not required under the consolidation guidance to consolidate in our financial statements most of the investment funds we advise. However, we consolidate certain CLOs and certain other funds that we advise, and the number of funds we are required to consolidate has been increasing as a result of the impacts of capital from our balance sheet invested in new products and our indirect interest in funds through our investment in Fortitude (see Note 4 , Investments ). As of December 31, 2025 , the assets and liabilities of the Consolidated Funds were primarily related to our consolidated CLOs, which held approximately $11.0 billion of total assets. Additionally, the Investments of Consolidated Funds included approximately $1.1 billion related to investments that have been bridged to investment funds in our Global Private Equity segment. Generally, the consolidation of the Consolidated Funds has a gross-up effect on our assets, liabilities and cash flows but has no net effect on the net income attributable to the Company. The majority of the net economic ownership interests of the Consolidated Funds are reflected as non-controlling interests in consolidated entities in the consolidated financial statements. However, in certain Consolidated Funds, particularly those where we have elected to invest additional amounts or bridge investments in new investment areas, the non-controlling interests are less significant and may impact net income attributable to the common stockholders . The Consolidated Funds are not the same entities in all periods presented. The Consolidated Funds in future periods may change due to changes in fund terms, formation of new funds, and terminations of funds. Because only a small portion of our funds are consolidated, the performance of the Consolidated Funds is not necessarily consistent with or representative of the combined performance trends of all of our funds. For further information on our consolidation policy and the consolidation of certain funds, see Note 2 , Summary of Significant Accounting Policies , to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Consolidated Results of Operations The following table and discussion sets forth information regarding our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 . Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared on substantially the same basis for all historical periods presented; however, the C onsolidated Funds are not the same entities in all periods shown due to changes in fund terms and the creation and termination of funds. As further described above, the consolidation of these funds primarily has the impact of increasing interest and other income of Consolidated Funds, interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds, and net investment income (losses) of Consolidated Funds in the year that the fund is initially consolidated. The consolidation of th ese funds had no effect on net income attributable to the Company for the periods presented. 105 Table of Contents Year Ended December 31, Change 2025 2024 $ % (Dollars in millions) Revenues Fund management fees $ 2,396.6 $ 2,188.1 $ 208.5 10 % Incentive fees 190.5 133.5 57.0 43 % Investment income Performance allocations 1,222.5 2,015.7 (793.2) (39) % Principal investment income 119.2 238.7 (119.5) (50) % Total investment income 1,341.7 2,254.4 (912.7) (40) % Interest and other income 215.7 218.2 (2.5) (1) % Interest and other income of Consolidated Funds 635.3 631.6 3.7 1 % Total revenues 4,779.8 5,425.8 (646.0) (12) % Expenses Compensation and benefits Cash-based compensation and benefits 895.2 875.5 19.7 2 % Equity-based compensation 374.7 467.9 (93.2) (20) % Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation 936.3 1,361.5 (425.2) (31) % Total compensation and benefits 2,206.2 2,704.9 (498.7) (18) % General, administrative and other expenses 784.3 665.6 118.7 18 % Interest 123.9 121.0 2.9 2 % Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds 624.3 564.9 59.4 11 % Other non-operating expenses (income) (0.2) (0.3) 0.1 (33) % Total expenses 3,738.5 4,056.1 (317.6) (8) % Other income Net investment income of Consolidated Funds 117.9 24.0 93.9 NM Income before provision for income taxes 1,159.2 1,393.7 (234.5) (17) % Provision for income taxes 214.5 302.6 (88.1) (29) % Net income 944.7 1,091.1 (146.4) (13) % Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities 136.0 70.7 65.3 92 % Net income attributable to The Carlyle Group Inc. Common Stockholders $ 808.7 $ 1,020.4 $ (211.7) (21) % NM - Not meaningful. 106 Table of Contents Revenues Fund management fees . Fund management fees increased $208.5 million , or 10% , for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024 , primarily due to the following: Year Ended December 31, 2025 v. 2024 (Dollars in millions) Increase in management fees from the commencement of the investment period for certain newly raised funds which charge fees based on commitments and the impact of incremental fundraising in funds which activated fees in a prior period $ 232.9 Net decrease in management fees resulting from the change in basis from commitments to invested capital and step-downs in rate for certain funds, and the impact of net investment activity in funds whose management fees are based on invested capital, including the impact of changes in the base under the strategic advisory services agreement with Fortitude (132.8) Increase in catch-up management fees from subsequent closes of funds that are in the fundraising period 46.8 Increase in transaction and portfolio advisory fees 53.5 All other changes (1) 8.1 Total increase in Fund management fees (2) $ 208.5 (1) The year ended December 31, 2025 included approximately $19 million of catch-up subordinated management fees in certain aviation funds. (2) Total increase in Fund management fees does not include our equity income allocation from NGP management fee related revenues. We do not control NGP and account for our strategic investment in NGP as an equity method investment under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, Fund management fees associated with NGP are included in Principal investment income (loss) in our U.S. GAAP results. N o fund generated over 10% of total fund management fees in any of the periods presented. In 2025, average Fee- earning AUM in our Carlyle AlpInvest and Global Credit segments grew approximately 21% and 5%, respectively, relative to the average balances in 2024, while average Fee-earning AUM in 2025 for Global Private Equity fell by 3% relative to the average balance in 2024. As a result, Fund management fees increased in Carlyle AlpInvest and Global Credit, while Global Private Equity decreased, which was due in part to smaller buyout fund sizes in our corporate private equity strategy and step- downs in rate or basis as well as realizations , partially offset by the activation of fees in certain products in our Global Private Equity segment. The increase in catch-up management fees for the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily attributable to our Carlyle AlpInvest segment. We expect catch-up management fees associated with our Carlyle AlpInvest segment to decrease in 2026 compared to 2025, as fundraising for our most recent vintage of secondaries & portfolio finance funds concluded during 2025. Fund management fees included transaction and portfolio advisory fees, net of rebate offsets, of $206.0 million and $152.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 , respectively. These fees primarily comprise capital markets fees generated by Carlyle Global Capital Markets. The recognition of portfolio advisory fees, transactions fees, and capital markets fees can be volatile as they are primarily generated by investment activity within our funds, and therefore are impacted by our investment pace. See “—Trends Affecting Our Business” for further discussion on our investment activity and broader market trends. 107 Table of Contents Investment income . Investment income decreased $0.9 billion for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024 , which included a decrease in Performance allocations of $0.8 billion and a decrease in Principal investment income (loss) of $0.1 billion . The components of Investment income are included in the following table: Year Ended December 31, Change 2025 2024 $ % (Dollars in millions) Performance allocations $ 1,222.5 $ 2,015.7 $ (793.2) (39) % Principal investment income: Investment income from NGP, which includes performance allocations (28.2) 103.6 (131.8) (127) % Investment income from our carry funds: Global Private Equity 40.4 35.3 5.1 14 % Global Credit 13.6 12.3 1.3 11 % Carlyle AlpInvest 14.0 6.4 7.6 119 % Investment (loss) income from our CLOs (15.9) 23.0 (38.9) NM Investment income from Carlyle FRL 29.8 33.8 (4.0) (12) % Investment income (loss) from our other Global Credit products 15.4 (4.8) 20.2 NM Investment income on foreign currency hedges 2.1 4.0 (1.9) (48) % All other investment income (loss) 48.0 25.1 22.9 91 % Total Principal investment income 119.2 238.7 (119.5) (50) % Total Investment income $ 1,341.7 $ 2,254.4 $ (912.7) (40) % Performance allocations . Performance allocations by segment for years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 comprised the following: Year Ended December 31, Change 2025 2024 $ % (Dollars in millions) Global Private Equity $ 680.9 $ 1,559.9 $ (879.0) (56) % Global Credit 282.6 227.7 54.9 24 % Carlyle AlpInvest 259.0 228.1 30.9 14 % Total performance allocations $ 1,222.5 $ 2,015.7 $ (793.2) (39) % Performance allocations for the year ended December 31, 2025 included : • In the Global Private Equity segment, Performance allocation accruals were primarily driven by appreciation in CP VII, CP VIII, and our infrastructure and natural resources funds, partially offset by the reversal of Performance allocation accruals in CAP V driven by the impact of preferred returns. • In the Global Credit segment, Performance allocation accruals were primarily driven by appreciation in SASOF V, CCOF II, and CCOF III. • In the Carlyle AlpInvest segment, Performance allocation accruals were primarily driven by appreciation in ASF VIII, ACF VIII, and ASF VII . Performance allocations for the year ended December 31, 2024 included: • In the Global Private Equity segment, Performance allocation accruals were primarily driven by appreciation in CP VII, and to a lesser extent appreciation in CP VIII, partially offset by the reversal of Performance allocation accruals in CEP V reflecting portfolio depreciation. 108 Table of Contents • In the Global Credit segment, Performance allocation accruals were primarily driven by appreciation in our opportunistic credit funds. • In the Carlyle AlpInvest segment, Performance allocation accruals were primarily driven by appreciation in our secondaries & portfolio finance and co-investment funds . See “—Trends Affecting Our Business” for further discussion on the macroeconomic, geopolitical and industry landscape, and our investment activity. Principal investment income . The decrease in Principal investment income for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024 was primarily attributable to an impairment charge of $92.5 million and a $38.0 million reduction in NGP accrued carry, both related to the restructuring of the terms of our strategic investment in NGP (see Note 4, Investments, for more information), and investment losses from our CLOs in 2025 compared to gains in 2024. These were partially offset by an increase in investment income (loss) from our other Global Credit products primarily driven by our BDCs and an increase in investment income related to our Carlyle AlpInvest products . Expenses Compensation and benefits . Total compensation and benefits decreased $498.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024 , primarily attributable to a decrease in Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation of $425.2 million , which was primarily attributable to the impact of the decrease in Performance allocations on which Performance allocations and incentive fee related compensation is based, and a decrease in Equity-based compensation of $93.2 million , which was primarily attributable to lower amortization on performance-based stock awards, partially offset by additional equity awards granted in February 2025. In December 2025, we granted 2.7 million restricted stock units that are subject to vesting based on the achievement of stock price performance conditions over a service period of four years. The grant-date fair value of these performance-based stock awards was approximately $136 million . As a result, Equity-based compensation is expected to be higher in 2026 and s uch expense is incurred regardless of whether the stock price performance conditions are achieved. General, administrative and other expenses . General, administrative and other expenses increased $118.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to 2024 , primarily attributable to an increase in foreign currency remeasurement adjustments of $21.7 million driven by the movement of EUR and GBP relative to USD, an increase in liabilities for litigation- related contingencies, regulatory examination and inquiries, and other matters of $15.0 million , an increase in professional fees, as well as smaller increases in external fundraising, marketing, travel, and information technology costs, and other expenses associated with growing the business. Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds . Interest and other expenses of Consolidated Funds increased $59.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 , primarily due to an increase in interest expense on loans payable and other expenses attributable to a new collateralized fund obligation vehicle in our Carlyle AlpInvest segment that was consolidated in 2025 . Net investment income (loss) of Consolidated Funds. The table below summarizes the components of Net investment income (loss) of Consolidated Funds, including our consolidated CLOs and certain other funds: Year Ended December 31, Change 2025 2024 $ % (Dollars in millions) Realized gains (losses) $ 28.3 $ (60.7) $ 89.0 NM Net change in unrealized gains (losses) (11.9) 157.1 (169.0) NM Total gains 16.4 96.4 (80.0) (83) % Gains (losses) from liabilities of CLOs 101.5 (72.4) 173.9 NM Total net investment income of Consolidated Funds $ 117.9 $ 24.0 $ 93.9 NM Net investment income of Consolidated Funds for the year ended December 31, 2025 primarily included net gains of $308.9 million across various Carlyle AlpInvest and Global Private Equity Consolidated Funds, partially offset by unrealized losses of $178.2 million related to a consolidated infrastructure fund, of which approximately $150 million is attributable to the 109 Table of Contents Company. Net investment income of Consolidated Funds for the year ended December 31, 2025 also reflected $12.8 million in losses related to our CLOs . Provision for income taxes . For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 , our provision for income taxes was $214.5 million and $302.6 million , respectively, and the Company’s effective tax rates were 18.5% and 21.7% , respectively. The effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 primarily comprised the 21% U.S. federal corporate income tax rate plus the impact of U.S. state and foreign corporate income tax provision. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2025 was partially offset by net excess tax benefits on Equity-based compensation and non-controlling interest . See Note 10 , Income Taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for more information on our provision for income taxes . As of December 31, 2025 and 2024 , the Company had federal, state, local, and foreign taxes payable of $141.4 million and $46.2 million , respectively, which is recorded as a component of accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities . Net income attributable to non- controlling interests in consolidated entities was $136.0 million and $70.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 , respectively. These amounts are primarily related to the net earnings of the Consolidated Funds attributable to the related fund’s limited partners or CLO investors for each perio d , as well as net earnings from our insurance solutions business and certain other products that are allocated to certain third-party investors. These amounts also reflect the net income attributable to non-controlling interests in carried interest and giveback obligations. The net income (loss) of our Consolidated Funds, after eliminations, attributable to non-controlling interests was $109.8 million and $8.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 , respectively. Non-GAAP Financial Measures The following tables set forth information in the format used by management when making resource deployment decisions and in assessing performance of our segments. These Non-GAAP financial measures are presented for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 . Our Non-GAAP financial measures exclude the effects of unrealized performance allocations net of related compensation expense, unrealized principal investment income, consolidated funds, acquisition and disposition-related items including amortization and any impairment charges of acquired intangible assets and contingent consideration taking the form of earn-outs, charges associated with the Conversion, impairment charges associated with lease right-of-use assets, gains or losses from retirement of debt, charges associated with contract terminations and employee severance, charges associated with equity-based compensation, changes in the tax receivable agreement liability, corporate actions, infr equently occurring or unusual events, and non-recurring items that affect period-to-period comparability and are not reflective of the Company's operating performance . The following table shows our total segment DE and FRE for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 . Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 (Dollars in millions) Total Segment Revenues $ 3,901.5 $ 3,655.4 Total Segment Expenses 2,210.3 2,129.9 (=) Distributable Earnings $ 1,691.2 $ 1,525.5 (-) Realized Net Performance Revenues 357.3 366.1 (-) Realized Principal Investment Income 151.8 101.0 (+) Net Interest 54.1 46.2 (=) Fee Related Earnings $ 1,236.2 $ 1,104.6 110 Table of Contents The following table sets forth our total segment revenues for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 . Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 (Dollars in millions) Segment Revenues Fund level fee revenues Fund management fees $ 2,243.1 $ 2,107.5 Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other 225.1 163.6 Fee related performance revenues 174.5 132.7 Total fund level fee revenues 2,642.7 2,403.8 Realized performance revenues 1,037.4 1,075.9 Realized principal investment income 151.8 101.0 Interest income 69.6 74.7 Total Segment Revenues $ 3,901.5 $ 3,655.4 The following table sets forth our total segment expenses for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 . Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 (Dollars in millions) Segment Expenses Compensation and benefits Cash-based compensation and benefits $ 902.1 $ 861.7 Realized performance revenue related compensation 680.1 709.8 Total compensation and benefits 1,582.2 1,571.5 General, administrative, and other indirect expenses 450.4 390.7 Depreciation and amortization expense 54.0 46.8 Interest expense 123.7 120.9 Total Segment Expenses $ 2,210.3 $ 2,129.9 111 Table of Contents Income (loss) before provision for income taxes is the U.S. GAAP financial measure most comparable to Distributable Earnings and Fee Related Earnings. The following table is a reconciliation of income (loss) before provision for income taxes to Distributable Earnings and to Fee Related Earnings . Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 (Dollars in millions) Income (loss) before provision for income taxes $ 1,159.2 $ 1,393.7 Adjustments: Net unrealized performance and fee related performance revenues (22.5) (396.7) Unrealized principal investment (income) loss 19.4 (34.1) Equity-based compensation (1) 376.6 476.5 Acquisition or disposition-related charges, including amortization of intangibles and impairment 262.4 136.6 Tax (expense) benefit associated with certain foreign performance revenues (0.5) (1.0) Net income attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities (136.0) (70.7) Other adjustments (2) 32.6 21.2 (=) Distributable Earnings 1,691.2 1,525.5 (-) Realized net performance revenues, net of related compensation (3) 357.3 366.1 (-) Realized principal investment income (3) 151.8 101.0 (+) Net interest 54.1 46.2 (=) Fee Related Earnings $ 1,236.2 $ 1,104.6 (1) Equity-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 includes amounts presented in principal investment income and general, administrative and other expenses in our U.S. GAAP statement of operations. (2) Includes charges (credits) related to Carlyle corporate actions and non-recurring items that affect period-to-period comparability and are not reflective of the Company’s operating performance. (3) See reconciliation to most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure below: Year Ended December 31, 2025 Carlyle Consolidated Adjustments (4) Total Reportable Segments (Dollars in millions) Performance revenues $ 1,222.5 $ (185.1) $ 1,037.4 Performance revenues related compensation expense 936.3 (256.2) 680.1 Net performance revenues $ 286.2 $ 71.1 $ 357.3 Principal investment income (loss) $ 119.2 $ 32.6 $ 151.8 Year Ended December 31, 2024 Carlyle Consolidated Adjustments (4) Total Reportable Segments (Dollars in millions) Performance revenues $ 2,015.7 $ (939.8) $ 1,075.9 Performance revenues related compensation expense 1,361.5 (651.7) 709.8 Net performance revenues $ 654.2 $ (288.1) $ 366.1 Principal investment income (loss) $ 238.7 $ (137.7) $ 101.0 (4) Adjustments to performance revenues and principal investment income (loss) relate to (i) unrealized performance allocations net of related compensation expense and unrealized principal investment income, which are excluded from our Non-GAAP results, (ii) amounts earned from the Consolidated Funds, which were eliminated in the U.S. GAAP consolidation but were included in the Non-GAAP results, (iii) amounts attributable to non-controlling interests in consolidated entities, which were excluded from the Non-GAAP results, (iv) the reclassification of NGP performance revenues, which are included in investment income in the U.S. GAAP financial statements, (v) the reclassification of fee related performance revenues, which are included in fund level fee 112 Table of Contents revenues in the segment results, and (vi) the reclassification of tax expenses associated with certain foreign performance revenues. Adjustments to principal investment income (loss) also include the reclassification of earnings for the investment in NGP Management and its affiliates to the appropriate operating captions for the Non-GAAP results, and the exclusion of charges associated with the investment in NGP Management and its affiliates that are excluded from the Non-GAAP results. Distributable Earnings for our reportable segments are as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 (Dollars in millions) Global Private Equity $ 890.8 $ 957.3 Global Credit 481.0 377.3 Carlyle AlpInvest 319.4 190.9 Distributable Earnings $ 1,691.2 $ 1,525.5 Segment Analysis Discussed below is our DE and FRE for our segments for the periods presented. Our segment information is reflected in the manner used by our chief operating decision maker to make operating and compensation decisions, assess performance, and allocate resources. For segment reporting purposes, revenues and expenses are presented on a basis that deconsolidates our Consolidated Funds. As a result, segment revenues from management fees, realized performance revenues and realized principal investment income (loss) are different than those presented on a consolidated U.S. GAAP basis because these revenues recognized in certain segments are received from Consolidated Funds and are eliminated in consolidation when presented on a consolidated U.S. GAAP basis. Furthermore, segment expenses are different than related amounts presented on a consolidated U.S. GAAP basis due to the exclusion of fund expenses that are paid by the Consolidated Funds. 113 Table of Contents Global Private Equity The following table presents our results of operations for our Global Private Equity (1) segment: Year Ended December 31, Change 2025 2024 $ % (Dollars in millions) Segment Revenues Fund level fee revenues Fund management fees $ 1,176.3 $ 1,212.0 $ (35.7) (3) % Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other 39.0 24.6 14.4 59 % Fee related performance revenues 0.3 6.9 (6.6) (96) % Total fund level fee revenues 1,215.6 1,243.5 (27.9) (2) % Realized performance revenues 845.6 927.2 (81.6) (9) % Realized principal investment income 56.3 49.7 6.6 13 % Interest income 28.7 28.1 0.6 2 % Total revenues 2,146.2 2,248.5 (102.3) (5) % Segment Expenses Compensation and benefits Cash-based compensation and benefits 397.2 422.8 (25.6) (6) % Realized performance revenues related compensation 540.4 590.1 (49.7) (8) % Total compensation and benefits 937.6 1,012.9 (75.3) (7) % General, administrative, and other indirect expenses 228.1 195.2 32.9 17 % Depreciation and amortization expense 29.4 26.8 2.6 10 % Interest expense 60.3 56.3 4.0 7 % Total expenses 1,255.4 1,291.2 (35.8) (3) % (=) Distributable Earnings $ 890.8 $ 957.3 $ (66.5) (7) % (-) Realized net performance revenues 305.2 337.1 (31.9) (9) % (-) Realized principal investment income 56.3 49.7 6.6 13 % (+) Net interest 31.6 28.2 3.4 12 % (=) Fee Related Earnings $ 560.9 $ 598.7 $ (37.8) (6) % (1) For purposes of presenting our results of operations for this segment, our earnings from our investments in NGP are presented in the respective operating captions. 114 Table of Contents Distributable Earnings Distributable Earnings decreased $66.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 . The following table provides the components of the changes in Distributable Earnings for the year ended December 31, 2025 : Year Ended December 31, 2025 v. 2024 (Dollars in millions) Distributable Earnings, December 31, 2024 $ 957.3 Increases (decreases): Decrease in Fee related earnings (37.8) Decrease in Realized net performance revenues (31.9) Increase in Realized principal investment income 6.6 Increase in Net interest (3.4) Total decrease (66.5) Distributable Earnings, December 31, 2025 $ 890.8 Realized net performance revenues. Realized net performance revenues decreased $31.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 . For the year ended December 31, 2025 , realized net performance revenues of $305.2 million were primarily driven by CPP II, NGP XI, CP VI, CETP IV, and CAP IV. For the year ended December 31, 2024 , realized net performance revenues of $337.1 million were primarily driven by CAP IV, CIEP I , and CEOF II. Fee Related Earnings Fee Related Earnings decreased $37.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 . The following table provides the components of the changes in Fee Related Earnings for the year ended December 31, 2025 : Year Ended December 31, 2025 v. 2024 (Dollars in millions) Fee Related Earnings, December 31, 2024 $ 598.7 Increases (decreases): Decrease in Fee revenues (27.9) Decrease in Cash-based compensation and benefits 25.6 Increase in General, administrative and other indirect expenses (32.9) All other changes (2.6) Total decrease (37.8) Fee Related Earnings, December 31, 2025 $ 560.9 Fee revenues. Total Fee revenues decreased $27.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 , due to the following: Year Ended December 31, 2025 v. 2024 (Dollars in millions) Lower Fund management fees $ (35.7) Higher Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other 14.4 Lower Fee related performance revenues (6.6) Total decrease in Fee revenues $ (27.9) T he decrease in Fund management fees for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 was primarily due to step-downs in management fee basis on CEP V and CRP IX in the fourth quarter of 2024, a step-down in the management 115 Table of Contents fee basis of CIEP II in the second quarter of 2025, as well as net investment realizations in funds on which management fees are based on invested capital, including the sale of the remaining assets in our power funds and other asset sales in funds such as CP VII and NGP XI. These were partially offset by the activation of fees in CRP X, which turned on fees on April 1, 2025, as well as CJP V, which turned on fees in the fourth quarter of 2024. The impact of smaller buyout funds in our corporate private equity strategy is resulting in, and may continue to result in, lower fund management fees relative to prior periods . The increase in Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 was primarily due to an increase in transaction fees related to the acquisition of a healthcare investment across our U.S., Europe, and Asia buyout funds. Cash-based compensation and benefits expense. Cash-based compensation and benefits expense decreased $25.6 million , for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 , primarily due to an increase in the portion of compensation being derived from Realized performance revenues related compens ation as well as lower headcount in the segment . General, administrative and other indirect expenses. General, administrative and other indirect expenses increased $32.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 , primarily attributable to an increase in professional fees . Fee-earning AUM Fee-earning AUM is presented below for each period together with the components of change during each respective period. The table below breaks out Fee-earning AUM by its respective components at each period. As of December 31, 2025 2024 (Dollars in millions) Global Private Equity Components of Fee-earning AUM (1) Fee-earning AUM based on capital commitments $ 41,223 $ 34,484 Fee-earning AUM based on invested capital 49,908 52,998 Fee-earning AUM based on net asset value 7,693 7,348 Fee-earning AUM based on lower of cost or fair value 2,542 3,203 Total Fee-earning AUM $ 101,366 $ 98,033 Annualized Management Fee Rate (2) 1.17 % 1.17 % (1) For additional information concerning the components of Fee-earning AUM, see “—Key Financial Measures—Operating Metrics.” (2) Represents annualized fund management fees divided by the average of the beginning of year and each quarter end’s Fee-earning AUM in the reporting period. Catch-up management fees were excluded in the calculation of the annualized fund management fees. The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Fee-earning AUM. Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 (Dollars in millions) Global Private Equity Fee-earning AUM Rollforward Balance, Beginning of Period $ 98,033 $ 106,651 Inflows (1) 12,739 7,696 Outflows (including realizations) (2) (10,664) (14,910) Market Activity & Other (3) (285) (240) Foreign Exchange (4) 1,543 (1,164) Balance, End of Period $ 101,366 $ 98,033 (1) Inflows represents limited partner capital raised by our carry funds or separately managed accounts for which management fees based on commitments were activated during the period, and the fee-earning commitments invested in vehicles for which management fees are based on invested capital. Inflows exclude fundraising amounts during the period for which fees have not yet been activated, which are referenced as Pending Fee-earning AUM. 116 Table of Contents (2) Outflows represents the impact of realizations from vehicles with management fees based on remaining invested capital at cost or fair value, changes in basis for funds where the investment period, weighted-average investment period or commitment fee period has expired during the period, and reductions for funds that are no longer calling for fees. Realizations for funds earning management fees based on commitments during the period do not affect Fee-earning AUM. (3) Market Activity & Other represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds based on the lower of cost or fair value. (4) Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end. Fee-earning AUM of $101.4 billion at December 31, 2025 increased 3% from $98.0 billion at December 31, 2024 . The net increase was due to: • Inflows of $12.7 billion , primarily driven by the activation of management fees in CRP X, additional fee-paying capital raised in CAP VI, and investments in CPI and CAP V, which charge fees on invested capital; and • Positive foreign exchange activity of $1.5 billion predominantly reflecting the translation of our EUR-denominated funds to USD. Offsetting these increases were: • Outflows of $10.7 billion , which were driven by realizations in funds that charge fees on invested capital, notably in the NGP energy funds and our U.S. buyout, Europe buyout, Asia buyout, and U.S. real estate funds, as well as the expiration of fees in CP VI during the period and a fee basis step-down in CIEP II. Total AUM The table below provides the period to period rollforward of Total AUM. Year Ended December 31, 2025 2024 (Dollars in millions) Global Private Equity Total AUM Rollforward Balance, Beginning of Period $ 163,533 $ 161,308 Inflows (1) 7,549 12,695 Outflows (including realizations) (2) (17,053) (16,314) Market Activity & Other (3) 6,921 7,533 Foreign Exchange (4) 2,593 (1,689) Balance, End of Period $ 163,543 $ 163,533 (1) Inflows reflects the impact of gross fundraising during the period. For funds or vehicles denominated in foreign currencies, this reflects translation at the average quarterly rate. (2) Outflows includes distributions net of recallable or recyclable amounts in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, gross redemptions in our open-end products, and the expiration of available capital. (3) Market Activity & Other generally represents realized and unrealized gains (losses) on portfolio investments in our carry funds, related co-investment vehicles, and separately managed accounts, as well as the impact of fees, expenses and non-investment income, and other changes in AUM. (4) Foreign Exchange represents the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our non-U.S. dollar denominated funds. Activity during the period is translated at the average rate for the period. Ending balances are translated at the spot rate as of the period end. Total AUM was $163.5 billion at December 31, 2025 , flat compared to $163.5 billion at December 31, 2024 . This was due to: • Inflows of $7.5 billion , driven by new capital raised in our U.S. real estate, Asia buyout, life sciences, and infrastructure funds, as well as the NGP energy funds; • Market activity of $6.9 billion driven by appreciation in CP VII ($2.1 billion), CP VIII ($1.7 billion), CGP II ($0.7 billion), and CJP IV ($0.6 billion), partially offset by depreciation in CEP V ($1.1 billion); and 117 Table of Contents • Positive foreign exchange activity of $2.6 billion predominantly reflecting the translation of our EUR-denominated funds to USD. Offsetting these increases were: • Outflows of $17.1 billion , driven by realizations across the segment, notably in our U.S. buyout, power, U.S. real estate, international energy, and Europe technology funds, as well as the NGP energy funds. Fund Performance Metrics Fund performance information as of December 31, 2025 for our significant investment funds, which we generally define as those with at least $1.0 billion in capital commitments, is included throughout this discussion and analysis to facilitate an understanding of our results of operations for the periods presented. The fund return information reflected in this discussion and analysis is not indicative of the performance of The Carlyle Group Inc. and is also not necessarily indicative of the future performance of any particular fund. An investment in The Carlyle Group Inc. is not an investment in any of our funds. There can be no assurance that any of our funds or our other existing and future funds will achieve similar returns. See Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business Operations—Risks Related to the Assets We Manage—The historical returns attributable to our funds, including those presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, should not be considered as indicative of the future results of our funds or of our future results or of any returns expected on an investment in our common stock.” The following tables reflect the performance of our significant funds in our Global Private Equity business. See Part I, Item 1 “Business—Our Global Investment Offerings” for a legend of the fund acronyms listed below. 118 Table of Contents (Amounts in millions) TOTAL INVESTMENTS REALIZED/PARTIALLY REALIZED INVESTMENTS (12) As of December 31, 2025 As of December 31, 2025 Fund (Fee Initiation Date/Step-down Date) (1) Committed Capital (2) Cumulative Invested Capital (3) Percent Invested Realized Value (4) Remaining Fair Value (5) MOIC (6) Gross IRR (7)(8) Net IRR (8)(9) Net Accrued Carry/ (Giveback) (10) Total Fair Value (11) MOIC (6) Gross IRR (7)(8) Corporate Private Equity CP VIII (Oct 2021 / Oct 2027) $ 14,797 $ 10,978 74% $ 2,212 $ 13,986 1.5x 22% 12% $ 224 $ 2,225 1.7x 58% CP VII (May 2018 / Oct 2021) $ 18,510 $ 17,787 96% $ 8,210 $ 22,117 1.7x 12% 8% $ 692 $ 7,810 1.7x 13% CP VI (May 2013 / May 2018) $ 13,000 $ 13,140 101% $ 26,770 $ 1,729 2.2x 17% 13% $ 81 $ 27,547 2.5x 22% CP V (Jun 2007 / May 2013) $ 13,720 $ 13,238 96% $ 28,120 $ 336 2.1x 18% 14% $ 23 $ 28,131 2.3x 20% CEP V (Oct 2018 / Oct 2024) € 6,416 € 6,067 95% € 1,794 € 4,582 1.1x Neg Neg $ — € 878 1.1x 2% CEP IV (Sep 2014 / Oct 2018) € 3,670 € 3,964 108% € 6,215 € 1,269 1.9x 16% 11% $ 50 € 6,258 2.1x 20% CEP III (Jul 2007 / Dec 2013) € 5,295 € 5,177 98% € 11,731 € 18 2.3x 19% 14% $ 2 € 11,749 2.3x 19% CAP VI (Jun 2024 / Jun 2030) $ 2,886 $ 220 8% $ — $ 220 1.0x NM NM $ — n/a n/a n/a CAP V (Jun 2018 / Jun 2024) $ 6,554 $ 6,935 106% $ 3,059 $ 6,515 1.4x 12% 7% $ — $ 2,142 1.3x 23% CAP IV (Jul 2013 / Jun 2018) $ 3,880 $ 4,146 107% $ 8,713 $ 264 2.2x 18% 13% $ 18 $ 8,707 2.4x 21% CJP V (Nov 2024 / Nov 2030) ¥ 434,325 ¥ 54,616 13% ¥ — ¥ 54,757 1.0x NM NM $ — n/a n/a n/a CJP IV (Oct 2020 / Nov 2024) ¥ 258,000 ¥ 236,110 92% ¥ 148,550 ¥ 341,724 2.1x 38% 26% $ 100 ¥ 198,217 3.8x 66% CJP III (Sep 2013 / Aug 2020) ¥ 119,505 ¥ 91,192 76% ¥ 275,264 ¥ 8,832 3.1x 25% 18% $ 4 ¥ 274,341 3.3x 26% CGFSP III (Dec 2017 / Dec 2023) $ 1,005 $ 982 98% $ 697 $ 1,567 2.3x 21% 15% $ 73 $ 1,210 3.7x 32% CGFSP II (Jun 2013 / Dec 2017) $ 1,000 $ 943 94% $ 1,961 $ 650 2.8x 26% 19% $ 37 $ 1,956 2.4x 28% CP Growth (Oct 2021 / Oct 2027) $ 1,283 $ 673 52% $ — $ 831 1.2x 10% —% $ — n/a n/a n/a CEOF II (Nov 2015 / Mar 2020) $ 2,400 $ 2,368 99% $ 4,107 $ 1,447 2.3x 20% 15% $ 73 $ 4,674 2.5x 23% CETP V (Mar 2022 / Jun 2028) € 3,180 € 1,894 60% € — € 2,297 1.2x NM NM $ — n/a n/a n/a CETP IV (Jul 2019 / Jun 2022) € 1,350 € 1,204 89% € 1,726 € 1,040 2.3x 29% 20% $ 45 € 1,847 3.7x 56% CETP III (Jul 2014 / Jul 2019) € 657 € 614 94% € 2,033 € 81 3.4x 40% 28% $ 5 € 2,039 4.0x 44% CGP II (Dec 2020 / Jan 2025) $ 1,840 $ 984 53% $ 203 $ 1,972 2.2x 24% 19% $ 47 n/a n/a n/a CGP (Jan 2015 / Mar 2021) $ 3,588 $ 3,272 91% $ 1,866 $ 2,534 1.3x 5% 3% $ 17 $ 2,152 1.9x 12% All Other Active Funds & Vehicles (13) $ 20,873 n/a $ 15,807 $ 17,765 1.6x 12% 10% $ 35 $ 15,637 2.0x 18% Fully Realized Funds & Vehicles (14)(15) $ 35,488 n/a $ 81,557 $ 2 2.3x 28% 20% $ — $ 81,559 2.3x 28% TOTAL CORPORATE PRIVATE EQUITY (16) $ 156,667 n/a $ 213,564 $ 85,419 1.9x 25% 17% $ 1,527 $ 213,488 2.3x 26% Real Estate CRP X (Apr 2025 / Jul 2030) $ 9,000 $ 668 7% $ — $ 673 1.0x NM NM $ — n/a n/a n/a CRP IX (Oct 2021 / Dec 2024) $ 7,987 $ 6,238 78% $ 548 $ 6,863 1.2x 11% 3% $ — $ 468 1.4x 24% CRP VIII (Aug 2017 / Oct 2021) $ 5,505 $ 5,091 92% $ 5,880 $ 2,960 1.7x 31% 17% $ 76 $ 5,906 2.1x 47% CRP VII (Jun 2014 / Dec 2017) $ 4,162 $ 3,805 91% $ 5,116 $ 1,109 1.6x 16% 10% $ (16) $ 5,102 1.7x 20% CRP VI (Mar 2011 / Jun 2014) $ 2,340 $ 2,145 92% $ 3,827 $ 90 1.8x 27% 17% $ 4 $ 3,781 1.9x 28% CPI (May 2016 / n/a) $ 8,445 $ 8,910 106% $ 3,609 $ 8,061 1.3x 10% 8% n/a* $ 2,193 1.8x 12% All Other Active Funds & Vehicles (17) $ 2,618 n/a $ 535 $ 2,517 1.2x 9% 5% $ 5 $ 366 1.1x 22% Fully Realized Funds & Vehicles (15)(18) $ 14,289 n/a $ 21,640 $ 13 1.5x 9% 5% $ — $ 21,653 1.5x 10% TOTAL REAL ESTATE (16) $ 43,763 n/a $ 41,155 $ 22,285 1.4x 11% 7% $ 70 $ 39,469 1.6x 13% Infrastructure & Natural Resources CIEP II (Apr 2019 / Apr 2025) $ 2,286 $ 1,301 57% $ 991 $ 1,389 1.8x 28% 14% $ 46 $ 882 3.7x NM** CIEP I (Sep 2013 / Jun 2019) $ 2,500 $ 2,470 99% $ 3,570 $ 1,224 1.9x 15% 9% $ 51 $ 3,974 2.0x 16% CGIOF (Dec 2018 / Sep 2023) $ 2,201 $ 2,091 95% $ 658 $ 3,074 1.8x 19% 12% $ 93 $ 806 1.8x 16% CRSEF II (Nov 2022 / Aug 2027) $ 1,187 $ 472 40% $ — $ 918 1.9x NM NM $ 23 n/a n/a n/a NGP XIII (Feb 2023 / Feb 2028) $ 2,300 $ 905 39% $ 87 $ 1,163 1.4x NM NM $ 5 $ 99 3.2x NM NGP XII (Jul 2017 / Jul 2022) $ 4,304 $ 3,665 85% $ 4,871 $ 2,674 2.1x 21% 15% $ 32 $ 4,472 2.7x 33% NGP XI (Oct 2014 / Jul 2017) $ 5,325 $ 5,034 95% $ 8,269 $ 1,579 2.0x 13% 10% $ 57 $ 7,392 2.1x 17% NGP X (Jan 2012 / Dec 2014) $ 3,586 $ 3,351 93% $ 3,561 $ 207 1.1x 3% —% $ — $ 3,358 1.2x 5% All Other Active Funds & Vehicles (19) $ 5,168 n/a $ 3,396 $ 4,998 1.6x 15% 12% $ 38 $ 3,312 2.2x 18% Fully Realized Funds & Vehicles (15)(20) $ 3,534 n/a $ 5,581 $ — 1.6x 8% 5% $ — $ 5,581 1.6x 8% TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE & NATURAL RESOURCES (16) $ 27,990 n/a $ 30,983 $ 17,227 1.7x 12% 8% $ 343 $ 29,874 1.9x 14% 119 Table of Contents *Net accrued fee related performance revenues for CPI are excluded from Net Accrued Performance Revenues. These amounts will be reflected as fee related performance revenues when realized, and included in Fund level fee revenues in our segment results. There were no accrued fee related performance revenues for CPI as of December 31, 2025 . **The IRR is incalculable, which occurs in instances when a distribution occurs prior to a Limited Partner capital contribution due to the use of fund-level credit facilities. (1) The fund step-down date represents the contractual step-down date under the respective fund agreements for funds on which the fee basis step-down has not yet occurred. Funds without a listed Fee Initiation Date and Step-down Date have not yet initiated fees. (2) All amounts shown represent total capital commitments as of December 31, 2025. Certain of our recent vintage funds are currently in fundraising and total capital commitments are subject to change. (3) Represents the original cost of investments since inception of the fund. (4) Represents all realized proceeds since inception of the fund. (5) Represents remaining fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, and may include remaining escrow values for realized investments. (6) Multiple of invested capital (“MOIC”) represents total fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest, divided by cumulative invested capital. (7) Gross Internal Rate of Return (“Gross IRR”) represents an annualized return on Limited Partner invested capital, based on contributions, distributions and unrealized fair value as of the reporting date, before the impact of management fees, partnership expenses and carried interest. For fund vintages 2017 and after, Gross IRR includes the impact of interest expense related to the funding of investments on fund lines of credit. Gross IRR is calculated based on the timing of Limited Partner cash flows, which may differ to varying degrees from the timing of actual investment cash flows for the fund. Subtotal Gross IRR aggregations for multiple funds are calculated based on actual cash flow dates for each fund and represent a theoretical time-weighted return for a Limited Partner who invested sequentially in each fund. (8) For funds marked “NM,” IRR may be positive or negative, but is not considered meaningful because of the limited time since initial investment and early stage of capital deployment. For funds marked “Neg,” IRR is considered meaningful but is negative as of reporting period end. (9) Net Internal Rate of Return (“Net IRR”) represents an annualized return on Limited Partner invested capital, based on contributions, distributions and unrealized fair value as of the reporting date, after the impact of all management fees, partnership expenses and carried interest, including current accruals. Net IRR is calculated based on the timing of Limited Partner cash flows, which may differ to varying degrees from the timing of actual investment cash flows for the fund. Fund level IRRs are based on aggregate Limited Partner cash flows, and this blended return may differ from that of individual Limited Partners. As a result, certain funds may generate accrued performance revenues with a blended Net IRR that is below the preferred return hurdle for that fund. Subtotal Net IRR aggregations for multiple funds are calculated based on actual cash flow dates for each fund and represent a theoretical time-weighted return for a Limited Partner who invested sequentially in each fund. (10) Represents the net accrued performance revenue balance/(giveback obligation) as of the current quarter end. (11) Represents all realized proceeds combined with remaining fair value, before management fees, expenses and carried interest. (12) An investment is considered realized when the investment fund has completely exited, and ceases to own an interest in, the investment. An investment is considered partially realized when the total amount of proceeds received in respect of such investment, including dividends, interest or other distributions and/or return of capital, represents at least 85% of invested capital and such investment is not yet fully realized. Because part of our value creation strategy involves pursuing best exit alternatives, we believe information regarding Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR, when considered together with the other investment performance metrics presented, provides investors with meaningful information regarding our investment performance by removing the impact of investments where significant realization activity has not yet occurred. Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR have limitations as measures of investment performance and should not be considered in isolation. Such limitations include the fact that these measures do not include the performance of earlier stage and other investments that do not satisfy the criteria provided above. The exclusion of such investments will have a positive impact on Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR in instances when the MOIC and Gross IRR in respect of such investments are less than the aggregate MOIC and Gross IRR. Our measurements of Realized/Partially Realized MOIC and Gross IRR may not be comparable to those of other companies that use similarly titled measures. (13) Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as all active co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and stand-alone investments arranged by us: MENA, CCI, CSSAF I, CPF I, CAP Growth I, CAP Growth II, CBPF II, CAGP IV, ABV 8, ABV 9, ACCD 2, ACCD 3, and CCD-CIF. (14) Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as related co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us: CP I, CP II, CP III, CP IV, CEP I, CEP II, CAP I, CAP II, CAP 120 Table of Contents III, CBPF I, CJP I, CJP II, CMG, CVP I, CVP II, CUSGF III, CGFSP I, CEVP I, CETP I, CETP II, CAVP I, CAVP II, CAGP III, CEOF I, Mexico, and CSABF. (15) Funds are included when all investments have been realized. There may be remaining fair value and net accrued carry where there are outstanding escrow balances or undistributed proceeds. (16) For purposes of aggregation, funds that report in foreign currency have been converted to U.S. dollars at the reporting period spot rate. (17) Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as all active co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and stand-alone investments arranged by us: CCR, CER I, and CER II. (18) Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as related co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us: CRP I, CRP II, CRP III, CRP IV, CRP V, CRCP I, CAREP I, CAREP II, CEREP I, CEREP II, and CEREP III. (19) Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as all active co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and stand-alone investments arranged by us: NGP GAP, NGP RP I, NGP RP II, NGP RP III, NGP ETP IV, CPOCP, and CRSEF. (20) Aggregate includes the following funds, as well as related co-investments, separately managed accounts (SMAs), and certain other stand-alone investments arranged by us: CIP and CPP II. 121 Table of Contents Global Credit The following table presents our results of operations for our Global Credit segment: Year Ended December 31, Change 2025 2024 $ % (Dollars in millions) Segment Revenues Fund level fee revenues Fund management fees $ 609.1 $ 558.3 $ 50.8 9 % Portfolio advisory and transaction fees, net and other 185.8 138.8 47.0 34 % Fee related performance revenues 115.2 109.1 6.1 6 % Total fund level fee revenues 910.1 806.2 103.9 13 % Realized performance revenues 98.0 32.0 66.0 206 % Realized principal investment income 59.4 46.2 13.2 29 % Interest income 31.6 39.0 (7.4) (19) % Total revenues 1,099.1 923.4 175.7 19 % Segment Expenses Compensation and benefits Cash-based compensation and benefits 351.9 320.1 31.8 10 % Realized performance revenues related compensation 59.9 19.4 40.5 209 % Total compensation and benefits 411.8 339.5 72.3 21 % General, administrative, and other indirect expenses 140.3 140.4 (0.1) — % Depreciation and amortization expense 16.4 13.2 3.2 24 % Interest expense 49.6 53.0 (3.4) (6) % Total expenses 618.1 546.1 72.0 13 % (=) Distributable Earnings $ 481.0 $ 377.3 $ 103.7 27 % (-) Realized Net Performance Revenues 38.1 12.6 25.5 202 % (-) Realized Principal Investment Income 59.4 46.2 13.2 29 % (+) Net Interest 18.0 14.0 4.0 29 % (=) Fee Related Earnings $ 401.5 $ 332.5 $ 69.0 21 % 122 Table of Contents Distributable Earnings Distributable Earnings increased $103.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024 . The following table provides the components of the changes in Distributable Earnings for the year ended December 31, 2025 : Year Ended December 31, 2025 v. 2024 (Dollars in millions) Distributable Earnings, December 31, 2024 $ 377.3 Increases (decreases): Increase in Fee related earnings 69.0